Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: John S. wrote: beerbarrel wrote: On Sun, 10 Jul 2005 00:27:25 -0500, "Who Needs The ARRL?" JIm@GuessWho wrote: Imperfect though it is, the ARRL is the only voice the ham hobby has these days. It would be a very poor idea to do away with the ARRL without having something better to replace it. The ARRL does need to refocus it's efforts toward attracting newer younger members to the hobby if it is to survive long term. The hobby won't survive if its quasi-regulator continues to do treat amateur radio as though it operates in the heyday that was the 1950's. and it needs to avoid ****ing those folks as it reaches out to them I doubt that the ARRL will **** off the folks that it reaches out to. Sadly it will probably continue to bore those potential new members. The ARRL may (and should) **** off the complacent members who cling to the idea that out of date license tests should continue to be required because the old-timers had to take them. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 | General | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! | Policy | |||
ARRL Dilemmas (Representative KC8LDO a problem-operator) | CB |