| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
B. Otten:
I don't think anyone is going to "listen in and like it", right now anyway. Rather, let the techs listen in and come up with new ideas on how they can change it and breath some new life in it... if need be, perhaps some Chicken Banders can grab a license and add some help... then implement them with a purpose... No one likes change but a baby with a wet diaper--get ready baby... grin John "B. Otten" wrote in message ... MnMikew wrote: CW is not going to go away just because they drop the requirement. Like Steve says, It's not that hard. Most anyone can learn 5 wpm in as little as a month or less. I think that something worth having is worth earning. I say give techs a piece of HF and if they like HF, they can take the test to get access to the rest of it. I'm half-heartedly studying for the tech test and only really have interest in 2m right now. Techs can listen in on the HF bands and determine if they like it. If so, then let that serve as the incentive toward upgrading their license. The incentive licensing has worked well up until now..if you want more privileges, you put in the study to gain the privileges. No need to have techs given a piece of HF, but they can earn it with the upgrade. Bill KC9CS (Extra) |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF | CB | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement | Boatanchors | |||
| There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||