On 26 Jul 2005 22:57:42 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:


On Tue 26 Jul 2005 08:09:33a, (Peter Newman) wrote in
message news:42e622f3.3803171@news-server:

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:47:48 GMT, David wrote:

{snippage}

You are living in a fantasy construct.

It would have been enough to say simply "you are living in a fantasy",
or "you are living in a fantasy world". But you just had to use the
oh-so-fashionable (in the leftie world) word "construct", didn't you.
It makes you look oh-so-smart!

I guess it's OK if you are content to *look* smart instead of *be*
smart.



Everyone comes to that conclusion about rickets, usually within two, or at
most three posts. Your tolerance for utter B.S. is admirable!


-=jd=-
I had no idea it was a ''leftie'' word. Excuse me for my verbal
precisilon. Fascists don't like people with brains.

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:43:23 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


I don't see why I should even bother answering an article that starts
with a quote of Karl Marx! Anything this man has every said has been
discredited in practice, and millions of people suffered in the
process. Anyone who still seriously believes in the dead horse of
Marxism has no brain left.

Let me remind you that I started this thread with Churchill's comments
about Islam. You then retorted with a derisive statement of "crazy
white men", presumably in defence of Islam.

You go to war to secure the instrument of your demise (petroleum).
That's pretty wack.

Now you turned to dying
trees and environmentalism. Just another convenient way to badmouth
those "crazy white men" who brought us the very civilization that
feeds you and that you just love to despise, right?

You call this a hot-dog?

You should really look into the mirror and admit to yourself frankly
why you hate civilization so much. You feel left a bit behind, don't
you? Some deep-seated inferioity complex perhaps?

More of a love/hate relationship with ''civilization'' as you call it.

Ah, about those dying trees, all you romantic tree huggers should read
this: http://www.lomborg.com/books.htm
(But I don't really expect you to believe it - of course, it was
written by a white guy.)

Peter Newman



''The Future
The deforestation of tropical rain forests is a threat to life
worldwide. Deforestation may have profound effects on global climate
and cause the extinction of thousands of species annually.''

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...station_4.html

Written by our best scientific minds.

wrote:

Winston Churchill was part American,sort of.His mother was born in
America.


http://www.google.ca/search?q=church... &sa=N&tab=iw


http://www.goldismoney.info/forums/s...ad.php?t=21640

Most of that is old hat to me.The brits don't know the truth about the
REAL british monarchy.
cuhulin

Y3VodWxpbjoNCg0KVGhleSAodGhlIGJyaXRzKSBtaWdodCBhY2 N1c2UgdXMgb2YgdGhlIHNhbWUs
IHRoYXQgd2UgZG8gbm90IGtub3cgdGhlIHdob2xlIHN0b3J5IG Fib3V0IHRoZSAiYnVzaCBtb25h
cmNoeS4iICBUaGUgcHJpbmNlIGJ1c2ggKGdlb3JnZSkgaW5oZX JpdGVkIHRoZSBVUyB0aHJvbmUg
ZnJvbSBoaXMgZmF0aGVyICJLaW5nIEJ1c2guIg0KDQo8ZWVyaW UtbXVzaWMtZnJvbS10aGUtdHdp
bGlnaHQtem9uZS1pcy1oZWFyZC1wbGF5aW5nLWluLXRoZS1iYW NrZ3JvdW5kPg0KDQpKb2huDQoN
CjxjdWh1bGluQHdlYnR2Lm5ldD4gd3JvdGUgaW4gbWVzc2FnZS BuZXdzOjIwMjU4LTQyRTcxOTNF
LTEzNDhAc3RvcmVmdWxsLTMyNTYuYmF5LndlYnR2Lm5ldC4uLg 0KPiBNb3N0IG9mIHRoYXQgaXMg
b2xkIGhhdCB0byBtZS5UaGUgYnJpdHMgZG9uJ3Qga25vdyB0aG UgdHJ1dGggYWJvdXQgdGhlDQo+
IFJFQUwgIGJyaXRpc2ggbW9uYXJjaHkuDQo+IGN1aHVsaW4NCj 4=

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 23:22:21 GMT, David wrote:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:43:23 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


I don't see why I should even bother answering an article that starts
with a quote of Karl Marx! Anything this man has every said has been
discredited in practice, and millions of people suffered in the
process. Anyone who still seriously believes in the dead horse of
Marxism has no brain left.


#1:

Let me remind you that I started this thread with Churchill's comments
about Islam. You then retorted with a derisive statement of "crazy
white men", presumably in defence of Islam.

You go to war to secure the instrument of your demise (petroleum).
That's pretty wack.

Go back to point #1 above. What you replied makes no sense whatsover
in the context of this discussion: I did not go to any war for
petroleum, and petroleum is certainly not an instrument of my demise.
If you meant to say that the US (or all "crazy white men"?), then
exactly the same applies.

Let me also suggest that you stop driving a car, don't use any public
transport, immediately switch off any electrical appliances in your
home, including your computer.

I wonder where you live. I bet you live somewhere where you don't have
to work too hard, thanks to the very civilization that you hate so
much. You know what? You are simply bored. Move somewhere where you
will need to work really hard in order to be able to eat and have a
decent roof above your head. Then you will see things from a different
perspective and take fewer things for granted.

#2:

Now you turned to dying
trees and environmentalism. Just another convenient way to badmouth
those "crazy white men" who brought us the very civilization that
feeds you and that you just love to despise, right?

You call this a hot-dog?

You don't make sense. Go back to #2 above and then switch on your
brain.

You should really look into the mirror and admit to yourself frankly
why you hate civilization so much. You feel left a bit behind, don't
you? Some deep-seated inferioity complex perhaps?

More of a love/hate relationship with ''civilization'' as you call it.

Time to make an appointment with a psychiatrist as soon as possible.

Ah, about those dying trees, all you romantic tree huggers should read
this: http://www.lomborg.com/books.htm
(But I don't really expect you to believe it - of course, it was
written by a white guy.)

''The Future
The deforestation of tropical rain forests is a threat to life
worldwide. Deforestation may have profound effects on global climate
and cause the extinction of thousands of species annually.''

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Lib...station_4.html

Written by our best scientific minds.

Says someone who really desperately *wants* to believe this
politically correct crap. You are simply seeking justification for
your anger and hatred, whose real reason is your very own inferiority
complex - just be a man and admit it to yourself.

Buy the Lomborg book and get the *real* story, from a *real*
scientist. I promise this will be an eye opener for you. But I guess
you don't really want to open your eyes, do you. You like it better
this way - the more alarmist, the more apocalyptic, the more proving
of your "crazy white men" crap, then the better it feels, because you
just like to wallow in that negativity, like a pig in ****, don't you!

I started this thread talking about Muslims. But you are talking about
deforestation. I guess you don't realize that by desperately searching
for any suitable negative subject to justify your initial "crazy white
men" outburst, you are precisely confirming what I am saying - you are
entirely messed up. I hope it is not too late for you. You *can* fix
your brain up, but first you do need to be honest to yourself.


Peter Newman

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:34:57 GMT, David wrote:

On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:42:21 -0500, wrote:

Throwing money and food to other countries,some countries,results in the
rulers of those countries siphoning off the food and money for things
that does not help those countries.
cuhulin

Mr. Bono circumvents the corrupt state authorities by using NGOs to
administer the help.

Firstly, in a thoroughly corrupt country (like most countries in
Africa are), corruption is a way of life, hence even NGOs will be, and
indeed are, corrupt and inefficient - they are not staffed with
angels, but with real, local people.

But this is not the most important point. The main point is that
throwing money to the poor has never made them rich in the long term.
It just makes the situation worse by making them dependent on
handouts. To make them truly independent and thus conquer poverty, you
need to get the economy going and teach the people how to fend for
themselves. But in order to get economy going, you need to have a
legal system and a law obiding society.

In most African countries where you have violent thugs running
berserk, corrupt governments, inefficient legal system and law
enforcement, you can't start a business and no sensible foreign
company will invest there either. And that's precisely why there is
poverty in Africa.

Peter Newman

On Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:42:19 GMT, (Peter Newman)
wrote:


I started this thread talking about Muslims. But you are talking about
deforestation. I guess you don't realize that by desperately searching
for any suitable negative subject to justify your initial "crazy white
men" outburst, you are precisely confirming what I am saying - you are
entirely messed up. I hope it is not too late for you. You *can* fix
your brain up, but first you do need to be honest to yourself.

I say crazy white people are the reason the Muslims are ****ed. Who
gives the English the right to steal the Arab's oil?

But I was especially angry that Geoge Bush appointed another Howdy
Doodie looking cracker for the Supreme Nazi Court.

http://www.esr.org/outreach/climate_...t/co2_temp.jpg

War or no war,even in peacetime,U.S.A.MUST make sure U.S.A.has enough
oil.
cuhulin

On 26 Jul 2005 22:57:42 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:

On Tue 26 Jul 2005 08:09:33a, (Peter Newman) wrote in
message news:42e622f3.3803171@news-server:

On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:47:48 GMT, David wrote:

{snippage}

You are living in a fantasy construct.

It would have been enough to say simply "you are living in a fantasy",
or "you are living in a fantasy world". But you just had to use the
oh-so-fashionable (in the leftie world) word "construct", didn't you.
It makes you look oh-so-smart!

I guess it's OK if you are content to *look* smart instead of *be*
smart.



Everyone comes to that conclusion about rickets, usually within two, or at
most three posts. Your tolerance for utter B.S. is admirable!


Thanks. I am actually known by my friends for my patience. :-)
I can see a good potential in every human being. I think David also
has a fairly good potential - but he does lack insight, information
and experience. If he is, say, 18 years old, then all this would be
understandable. If he is 30, then you are right, he would be a truly
hopeless case.

Peter Newman