David wrote:
On 11 Aug 2005 07:11:27 -0700, "John S." wrote:



Yes, yes, I understand that you feel this way. The military-industrial
complex has entered into a vaguely defined conspiracy with the
globalists that is troubling to you. You should consider a medical
solution to control these schizophrenic tendencies before attempting to
post on this forum.

Bull****. Northern Command is the Brownshirts.

So tell me o wise one, what exactly is the signifigance of a brownshirt
or a Brownshirt.

Also, it sure looks like you and PRS are both sock puppets for the same
puppeteer.

"John S." wrote in message
ups.com...

They told Lehrman that the imminent Northcom nuclear terror exercise
based in
Charleston, S.C,

http://www.northcom.mil/index.cfm?fu...BFBB AC-F3CA-
BD2E-008C7B34AFE33114
where a nuclear warhead is smuggled off a ship and detonated, was
originally
intended to 'go live' - as in the drill would be used as the cover for a
real false
flag staged attack.


Can tell you where this plot most likely came from:

[From a review of the motion picture "Special Bulletin", on Amazon.com]
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...51236?v=glance


The whole "movie" is done to try and not be a movie at all. In the spirit of
H.G. Wells and "War of the Worlds" this 'movie' attempts to seem like an
actual news broadcast. You watch as a normal news day turns into a national
crisis. A group of anti-nuclear activists has assembled a make-shift atomic
device of comparable yield to the ones that destroyed Hiroshima and
Nagasaki. Thier demands are US nuclear disarmament, in the hopes that if
they forced the US to make the first move, the USSR would follow suit by
disarming in turn. The plot isn't very plausible, even by 80's standards,
but the film is interesting and enjoyable to watch.

And...

Special Bulletin is a TV movie about nuclear bomb threat in Charleston S.C.
and how on television network responses to crisis, when one of their
newcrews becomes in invovled. I really liked this movie, because of the way
that the network reacts to the crisis. In the beginning there is concern for
the hostages, but as the continues you see graphics and music being
developed. And it becomes less about the hostages and more about get the
story. Overall its a good movie.

I read an article at www.rense.com last week about that movie.War
of the Worlds is one of my favorite old movies.I saw the movie at the
old Paramount theater that used to be on Capitol Street in Jackson back
in the 1950's when it first came out.That movie scared the crap out of
me.
cuhulin

I did a Google news search for this story and I found no sources to
back up this theory that it was Byrnes' policy beliefs, let alone any
"coup" that led to this demoting. (Be VERY CAREFUL with that word
"coup" - it implies treason.) Of course, you can find just about any
conspiracy theory from any point of view you want on the internet and
"the man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest".

Interestingly, both the leftish Amy Goodman (Democracy Now/ Pacifica)
and the rightish or whatever Arianna Huffington say very similar
things.

Both say that Byrnes was demoted over adultery and both say that it is
a bit strange that the army seems to regard torture of prisoners as
less important than adultery.



http://news.yahoo.com/s/huffpost/200...uffpost/005427

[quote]

Here’s all the proof you need that the lunatics have taken over the
Pentagon and DoD asylums (that is, if the lunacy of their
Iraq policies hadn’t already convinced you):

Four-star General Kevin Byrnes, the third most senior of the Army’s 11
four-star generals, was sacked over allegations that he had an
extramarital affair. Meanwhile, Lt. General Ricardo Sanchez, the
senior commander in Iraq during the
Abu Ghraib torture and abuse scandal, is being considered for
promotion to, yep, four-star general.

Talk about your utterly perverted priorities.

Now, it long ago became clear that the Bushies inhabit a bizarro,
topsy-turvy universe -- a place where being utterly wrong about
slam-dunk WMD earns you a Medal of Freedom, dismissing a “Bin Ladin
Determined to Strike in U.S.” memo earns you a promotion to Secretary
of State, signing off on torture makes you AG material, another 123
American soldiers being blown up is the mark of an enemy in its “last
throes”, and outing an undercover
CIA agent (and then lying about it) merits a vote of confidence
instead of a pink slip.
[close quote]

http://www.democracynow.org/article..../08/11/1335209

[quote]
The Pentagon has refused to punish any senior military officers for
the prison abuse at Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo, but the army has taken
the rare action of relieving a four-star general of his command. But
not for any role in torture of prisoners. Gen. Kevin Byrnes stands
accused of having an extramarital affair with a civilian. The General
led the Army's Training and Doctrine Command at Fort Monroe, Virginia
and he was reportedly set to retire in November after 36 years of
service. Army officials say they could find no case of another
four-star general being relieved of duty in modern times.
[close quote]

Anything that we say nowdays that isn't kissing (I am NOT a
bushBu..Kisser) up to the bush administration,bush & company, implies
treason and implies we are terrorist and traitors.Even saying we are
straight (I am straight) and we believe in GOD (I believe in GOD) and
saying we are Christians (might not seem like it sometimes,but Yes,I am
a Christian) and saying we believe in the United States Constitution (I
DO) and saying we believe in the Ten Commandments (I cerainly DO) and
saying we believe in home schooling (I believe in home schooling)
implies treason and terrorism and that we are traitors.In todays
World,according to bush and the bush administration/bush & company and
the so-called supreme court (UNsupreme court),,,,,,,,, The good guys are
the bad guys and the bad guys are the good guys.Am I Lieing?
cuhulin

Read the Geneva Conventions.(I did when I was in the U.S.Army) Terrorist
have NO Rights at ALL!
cuhulin