Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "-=jd=-" wrote in message 8... On Sun 25 Sep 2005 10:17:05p, "FDR" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message ... On Sun 25 Sep 2005 08:36:15p, "FDR" wrote in message : "-=jd=-" wrote in message 8... On Sun 25 Sep 2005 05:12:30p, David wrote in message : On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:40:44 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: "I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class and sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal!" {Roger Baldwin - Founder of the ACLU} -=jd=- Roger Nash Baldwin was born in Wellesley, Massachusetts to Frank Fenno Baldwin and Lucy Cushing Nash. And pursued the following life-long ideal, stated in his own words: "I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the propertied class and sole control of those who produce wealth. Communism is the goal!" {Roger Baldwin - Founder of the ACLU} Aww c'mon jd, you couldn't refute him. Though you lack the integrity to admit it, I did - merely by reiterating the man's very own words. Has rickets or anyone else been able to refute that Baldwin lived by those words? Well, given the ACLU's agenda, actions and advocations, how could they refute them? It's unarguably self evident. It would take a truly heroic effort to spin Baldwin's very own words into something different. It must be frustrating for you guys to be stuck defending such tenuous positions... There was a lot else to his life besides those words. But that's ok if you can't refute it. Do I really need to? Does not the very agenda, actions and advocations of the ACLU bear out the relevancy of those words today? Or do you have some odd, twisted, leftists spin-logic that can be applied to reach some other conclusion? Can you refute that by standing in defense of the ACLU, you are complicit in their work as surrogates on behalf of the "North American Man- Boy Love Association"? Is that part of what you champion? Again, it must be frustrating, and quite a bit repulsive in this case, for you guys to be stuck defending such tenuous positions. You're getting awfully fustrated and defensive there jd. You sure can dish it but you can't take it. Sorry that I make you stoop to such baseless and hyperbolic statements. -=jd=- -- My Current Disposable Email: (Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly) |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
wide band receiver, HT, PC controlled radio | Scanner | |||
PC controlled reciever --- good idea? bad idea? or a just plain ugly one? | Scanner | |||
(OT) Say you Democrats | Shortwave | |||
Tabletop (R75) vs PC controlled (320D) Opinion | Shortwave | |||
Anyone know of a source for a computer controlled vfo? | Homebrew |