LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 26th 05, 04:46 AM
FDR
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
8...
On Sun 25 Sep 2005 10:17:05p, "FDR"
wrote in message
:


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
...
On Sun 25 Sep 2005 08:36:15p, "FDR"

wrote in message :


"-=jd=-" wrote in message
8...
On Sun 25 Sep 2005 05:12:30p, David wrote in
message :

On Sun, 25 Sep 2005 19:40:44 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote:



"I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the
propertied class and sole control of those who produce wealth.
Communism
is the goal!" {Roger Baldwin - Founder of the ACLU}

-=jd=-
Roger Nash Baldwin was born in Wellesley, Massachusetts to Frank
Fenno Baldwin and Lucy Cushing Nash.

And pursued the following life-long ideal, stated in his own words:
"I seek the social ownership of property, the abolition of the
propertied class and sole control of those who produce wealth.
Communism is the goal!" {Roger Baldwin - Founder of the ACLU}

Aww c'mon jd, you couldn't refute him.


Though you lack the integrity to admit it, I did - merely by
reiterating the
man's very own words. Has rickets or anyone else been able to refute
that Baldwin lived by those words? Well, given the ACLU's agenda,
actions and advocations, how could they refute them? It's unarguably
self evident. It would take a truly heroic effort to spin Baldwin's
very own words into something different. It must be frustrating for you
guys to be stuck defending such tenuous positions...


There was a lot else to his life besides those words. But that's ok if
you can't refute it.


Do I really need to? Does not the very agenda, actions and advocations of
the ACLU bear out the relevancy of those words today? Or do you have some
odd, twisted, leftists spin-logic that can be applied to reach some other
conclusion? Can you refute that by standing in defense of the ACLU, you
are
complicit in their work as surrogates on behalf of the "North American
Man-
Boy Love Association"? Is that part of what you champion? Again, it must
be
frustrating, and quite a bit repulsive in this case, for you guys to be
stuck defending such tenuous positions.


You're getting awfully fustrated and defensive there jd. You sure can dish
it but you can't take it. Sorry that I make you stoop to such baseless and
hyperbolic statements.



-=jd=-
--
My Current Disposable Email:

(Remove YOUR HAT to reply directly)



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
wide band receiver, HT, PC controlled radio TomH Scanner 0 February 4th 05 02:37 PM
PC controlled reciever --- good idea? bad idea? or a just plain ugly one? tom Scanner 7 January 30th 05 04:40 AM
(OT) Say you Democrats Burr Shortwave 17 April 21st 04 03:58 PM
Tabletop (R75) vs PC controlled (320D) Opinion DEE Shortwave 10 March 3rd 04 02:36 AM
Anyone know of a source for a computer controlled vfo? OH3PC Homebrew 2 January 29th 04 12:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017