Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005 00:23:10 GMT, "-=jd=-"
wrote: On Wed 28 Sep 2005 07:01:00p, wrote in message : On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 21:35:56 GMT, "-=jd=-" wrote: What leads you to the assumption that I am "fustrated and defensive"? On the contrary, my statements are neither baseless nor hyperbolic and are grounded in fact. The ACLU is working on behalf of NAMBLA, plain and simple. Google "ACLU" and "NAMBLA" and see what you get. Then come back and explain why you are championing their causes and how you can deny being complicit in furthering the causes of an organization of *pedophiles*. It sounds to me like *I* have absolutely nothing to be defensive about. *You* on the other hand, have *ample* reason to begin back-peddling furiously. I would *if* I was in your untenable position: championing an organization that defends pedophiles... The ironic thing is they'd even defend a worm like you if someone tried to prevent you from saying what you just did. I would immediately reject any offer they might extend. They have absolutely nothing I want and I most definitely have no need for their assistance in any shape, form or fashion. If you want to be associated with them, then you are free to trash your own reputation. Your call, but they might well be your only choice. Since when is any group you disagree with to be deprived of legal counsel for any reason? I haven't said they should be deprived of legal counsel. I have said that the ACLU is working on behalf of NAMBLA, which is an organization of overt pedophiles. If you want to champion the ACLU and be complicit in assisting an organization of pedophiles, then you are free to sully your own reputation. Are you saying that no one is allowed to be disgusted by your choosing to support the ACLU as they protect an organization of pedophiles? You are clearly the "worm" here! LOL! Does your family know you are complicit in the support of an organization of child molesters? Are they proud of your perpetuation of perversity? (pardon the alliteration)... In your case illiteration would be the better word. If you want to go over the top, is your family proud you're a citizen of a nation which has spent its history defending slavery, whether within or without the law? How about its support of lunatics like Joe McCarthy and that disgrace to the Cathlic Church, Father Coughlin? How about its history of sending Japaanese American citizens to concentration camps, leaving them to suffer the continued loss of their former possessions after release and was too ****ing cowardly to consider apologizing unti recently. Hell of a lot you have to be proud of. Or you proud of all that? -=jd=- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
wide band receiver, HT, PC controlled radio | Scanner | |||
PC controlled reciever --- good idea? bad idea? or a just plain ugly one? | Scanner | |||
(OT) Say you Democrats | Shortwave | |||
Tabletop (R75) vs PC controlled (320D) Opinion | Shortwave | |||
Anyone know of a source for a computer controlled vfo? | Homebrew |