Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Want to replace old flat tv cable with better coax.
jg wrote: Here's a link to a picture of my antenna, maybe someone can tell me what I have. Also, does the fact that the "receivers" are off place and therefore touching affect the signal? Since I will be up there, I will straighten them, but odds are they will get crossed again. (I've aready fixed this in the past.) http://www.acequality.net/temp/antenna.jpg It appears you have the Radio Shack model VU-120 antenna. The best information I can get on this antenna is: gain is only fair to good and directivity is probably below average to average. This antenna is made mainly for local/suburb reception, NOT for distant stations. The beamwidth on this antenna is NOT narrow enough - that is why you can pick up San Francisco stations without turning the antenna. NOT A GOOD ANTENNA FOR WHAT YOU WANT TO RECEIVE. Stick with Channel Master, Winegard, or Jerrold brand antennas. They are built to last and have much higher gain and much better directivity. In YOUR case, I would add the Channel Master 8-bay bowtie antenna for distant UHF signals and keep your other antenna for the locals. Otherwise, you are talking about a $200 UHF/VHF antenna. The 8-bay antenna is not high priced, and beats the UHF section of EVERY UHF/VHF antenna on the market that I know of. But it is extremely directional and you will need a rotor. Also, not only is the gain high and the directivity outstanding, but the design of an 8-bay bowtie gives more "signal capture area" because of the large screen behind the active elements. This really helps in mountainess areas and other weak signal areas. The design of the antenna also narrows both vertical and horizontal beamwidth, resulting in less ghosting. If you can barely pick up a UHF signal with your current antenna, chances are the signal will be very good with the 8-bay bowtie. And I'm talking about your current antenna with NEW coax cable, not your current mixed lead. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Want to replace old flat tv cable with better coax.
Now if you really want to twist some wire,get somebody to hold on to one
end with a big Visegrip pliers and get an electric drill and clamp the other end of the wire in the drill chuck and mash that trigger and turn that drill motor on.I have here a Terk TV 50 antenna which I bought for five dollars at the Goodwill store about a year ago.It is about seven feet long and I think it is an amplified tv anteanna meant for motorhomes,campers,etc.Since I subscribe to DirecTV,I dont really need the Terk TV 50 for tv reception.I figure someday I will try it out on one of my other tv sets to see if it works.I have been wondering if it would work ok for a Shortwave Radio antenna,I guess someday I might try it out on one of my old beat up Goodwill Shortwave Radios and see what kind of noise it makes. cuhulin |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Want to replace old flat tv cable with better coax.
More info on your antenna compared to the 8-bay bowtie on UHF signals.
The following are approximate figures based on all the information I can find. Your antenna gives an average gain of about 6 db while the 8-bay bowtie gives an average gain of 13.0 db. Depending on the channel, the MINIMUM gain on your antenna is about 0 db while the MINIMUM on the 8-bay bowtie is 9.5. I don't have specifics as to the channels on your antenna. Every 3 db DOUBLES the signal. The average horizontal beamwith of your antenna on UHF is about 31 degrees while the 8-bay bowtie is about 21 degrees. BIG differences. The 8-bay bowtie rejects signals coming from the sides and back several times as much as your current antenna. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Want to replace old flat tv cable with better coax.
mm wrote:
My mother paid a tv guy to connect our tvs to the rooftop antenna, back in 1957. When I was in the attic several years later, a little before she was going to move, I saw that he had just twisted the wires together, even though there was a flatlead antennal splitter hanging right there, not being used. Back in those days there were a lot of fly-by-night TV repair shops. Most breakdowns didn't require a great deal of skill to fix, and the industry was much less regulated than it is today. Someone could read a few books, buy some tools and tubes, and set up a business. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Want to replace old flat tv cable with better coax.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Want to replace old flat tv cable with better coax.
On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:29:15 GMT, Bob wrote:
mm wrote: My mother paid a tv guy to connect our tvs to the rooftop antenna, back in 1957. When I was in the attic several years later, a little before she was going to move, I saw that he had just twisted the wires together, even though there was a flatlead antennal splitter hanging right there, not being used. This is boring. Skip to the last paragraph at the end. It's possible, remotely possible, that he brought the splitter, tried it and decided he was getting better reception, all in all, without it. I think the antenna lead only went to one room, the den?, and my mother wanted a tv in the bedroom too. (Although I don't remember us having two sets. !!! or what the second set would have looked like. After the Dumont broke, we got a Zenith with remote control. But that was in the den. Plainly I do remember the three runs of flatlead twisted together,(one from the antenna and two from the sets) so we must have had two sets.) Or maybe the previous owner had an antenna wire in the living room and that's why there was a splitter in the attic, but I don't remember seeing such a wire. Back in those days there were a lot of fly-by-night TV repair shops. Most breakdowns didn't require a great deal of skill to fix, and the industry was much less regulated than it is today. Someone could read a few books, buy some tools and tubes, and set up a business. The industry is regulated today? I'm serious. I haven't heard anything about this. Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let me know if you have posted also. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Want to replace old flat tv cable with better coax.
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:30:11 -0500, mm
wrote: Geeezzzz, I'm having a brain fart.... Is that RG50U.... ???? Don't sound right.... The older I get the more my memory fades !!! Not sure what you have but it may be called jamais vu, never seen. After David's post, I realize you really have never seen it. Remove NOPSAM to email me. Please let me know if you have posted also. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Want to replace old flat tv cable with better coax.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Want to replace old flat tv cable with better coax.
jg wrote:
19. (I want my kids to watch Spanish cartoons and I refuse to pay for cable.) I think Channel 19 is East of Modesto some place. (I had a I don't think Univision shows cartoons anymore. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Confused & Annoyed - My new Antenna does not work - What To Do Next ? | Shortwave | |||
FS: RG-213/U Coax Cable | Antenna | |||
FS: RG-213/U Coax Cable | CB | |||
FS: RG-58C/U Coax Cable, Military quality at very low cost | CB | |||
Coax cable interferance? | Antenna |