David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

When did it die, gringa? Please tell us.

You are such a moron.

Can't tell us, gringa? I thought not.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

End Mexico's exportation of poverty. Stop illegal immigration NOW.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

When did it die, gringa? Please tell us.

You are such a moron.

Can't tell us, gringa? I thought not.

Ad hominem aside, there has not been any significant usage of night skywave
AM radio since TV took over as the provider of night time entertainment to
America. Then, when FM took over the majority position in audience int he
mid-70's, there was not enough AM listening at night to worry about even in
the local home market.

Technical regulations based on now non-existent needs are arcane and
antiquated. And other countries in this Hemisphere show that US spacing
requirements are also unreasonable. AM radio regulation in the US is about
20 years behind the times.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

When did it die, gringa? Please tell us.

You are such a moron.

Can't tell us, gringa? I thought not.

Ad hominem aside, there has not been any significant usage of night skywave
AM radio since TV took over as the provider of night time entertainment to
America. Then, when FM took over the majority position in audience int he
mid-70's, there was not enough AM listening at night to worry about even in
the local home market.

Technical regulations based on now non-existent needs are arcane and
antiquated. And other countries in this Hemisphere show that US spacing
requirements are also unreasonable. AM radio regulation in the US is about
20 years behind the times.

But when did it die, gringa? Stop bull****ting, and back up your statement.

Also, gringa, please tell us why it's good practice to use three channels
instead of one.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

End Mexico's exportation of poverty. Stop illegal immigration NOW.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

When did it die, gringa? Please tell us.

You are such a moron.

Can't tell us, gringa? I thought not.

Ad hominem aside, there has not been any significant usage of night
skywave
AM radio since TV took over as the provider of night time entertainment
to
America. Then, when FM took over the majority position in audience int he
mid-70's, there was not enough AM listening at night to worry about even
in
the local home market.

Technical regulations based on now non-existent needs are arcane and
antiquated. And other countries in this Hemisphere show that US spacing
requirements are also unreasonable. AM radio regulation in the US is
about
20 years behind the times.

But when did it die, gringa? Stop bull****ting, and back up your
statement.

I already told you. go back asd see the radio usage in the three yearss
following the lift of the freeze. Night radio died in less than 36 months.

Also, gringa, please tell us why it's good practice to use three channels
instead of one.

Because the others are not usable by the average listener. Mexico, and many
other Hemisphere countries, license MW every 20 kHz in the local market.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

When did it die, gringa? Please tell us.

You are such a moron.

Can't tell us, gringa? I thought not.

Ad hominem aside, there has not been any significant usage of night
skywave
AM radio since TV took over as the provider of night time entertainment
to
America. Then, when FM took over the majority position in audience int he
mid-70's, there was not enough AM listening at night to worry about even
in
the local home market.

Technical regulations based on now non-existent needs are arcane and
antiquated. And other countries in this Hemisphere show that US spacing
requirements are also unreasonable. AM radio regulation in the US is
about
20 years behind the times.

But when did it die, gringa? Stop bull****ting, and back up your
statement.

I already told you. go back asd see the radio usage in the three yearss
following the lift of the freeze. Night radio died in less than 36 months.

Also, gringa, please tell us why it's good practice to use three channels
instead of one.

Because the others are not usable by the average listener. Mexico, and many
other Hemisphere countries, license MW every 20 kHz in the local market.

What does that have to do with us, gringa? And what the hell does that have to
do with QRMing two adjacent channels?

Pull your head out of your ass, little girl, and stop being a shill for
iBiquity.

LMFAO at the HFBPO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Arra,what's a gringa?
cuhulin

wrote in message
...
Arra,what's a gringa?

I guess he thinks it is a female gringo.

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

Because the others are not usable by the average listener. Mexico, and
many
other Hemisphere countries, license MW every 20 kHz in the local market.

What does that have to do with us, gringa?

If you want to discuss, cut out the stupid efforts to offend. They are
merely distractions.

What it has to do with the USA is that the AM rules were mostly written in
the 30's when night AM reception was where most tune-ins occured. Today,
most AM listening is in daytime hours, on receivers that are musch more
selective. So the adjacent channel rules are simply 50 years out of date,
and do not reflect current analog technology or the use of radio.

And what the hell does that have to
do with QRMing two adjacent channels?

It is only objectionable if people have regular listening disturbed by it.
They don't.

Pull your head out of your ass, little girl, and stop being a shill for
iBiquity.

The system is good. Better than any other alternative.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

Because the others are not usable by the average listener. Mexico, and
many
other Hemisphere countries, license MW every 20 kHz in the local market.

What does that have to do with us, gringa?

If you want to discuss, cut out the stupid efforts to offend. They are
merely distractions.

What it has to do with the USA is that the AM rules were mostly written in
the 30's when night AM reception was where most tune-ins occured. Today,
most AM listening is in daytime hours, on receivers that are musch more
selective. So the adjacent channel rules are simply 50 years out of date,
and do not reflect current analog technology or the use of radio.

And what the hell does that have to
do with QRMing two adjacent channels?

It is only objectionable if people have regular listening disturbed by it.
They don't.

Pull your head out of your ass, little girl, and stop being a shill for
iBiquity.

The system is good. Better than any other alternative.

You got your head up your ass, gringa!

dxAce
Michigan
USA

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

Because the others are not usable by the average listener. Mexico, and
many
other Hemisphere countries, license MW every 20 kHz in the local market.

What does that have to do with us, gringa?

If you want to discuss, cut out the stupid efforts to offend. They are
merely distractions.

What it has to do with the USA is that the AM rules were mostly written in
the 30's when night AM reception was where most tune-ins occured. Today,
most AM listening is in daytime hours, on receivers that are musch more
selective. So the adjacent channel rules are simply 50 years out of date,
and do not reflect current analog technology or the use of radio.

Who says? You, gringa? You need to take your little dog and pony show back
across the border.

LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA