Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... 3- Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra. Probably wouldn't make a real difference either way. 4- Make the no-code license one year non-renewable. Probably wouldn't make any difference. certainly would but then you are into killing the ars of course 5- Cancel your ARRL membership until they decide to work to improve things and stop them from proposing ham radio that is like CB. Terrible idea. The only way to get ARRL to change is to get involved in the politics of ARRL and work to try to effect the changes that you want. ask Carl Stevenson about that one |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Der it go again,,, on Radio tv....... UH HUH,,,,,,, The Third Man.Ladys
and Gals,,, y'all want to know sompin purrtainin to Fort Hood,Texas,1965? cuhulin |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() somebody wrote ... Code elements should be 13 wpm for General, and 20 wpm for Extra. Make the no-code license one year non-renewable. .... and new aircraft pilot license requirement: Demonstrate an engine start by spinning the prop -- by hand. Even if you intend to fly only jets, some old "prop-job" might be the only thing that can get through in an emergency. I wonder: Did the radio amateur community go through anything like this for the transition away from spark? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sal M. Onella" wrote:
I wonder: Did the radio amateur community go through anything like this for the transition away from spark? Yes, they did. -- 73, Eric F. Richards, KB0YDN, "A few old diehards still blazoned 'Spark Forever!' on their QSL cards..." - from "200 Meters & Down", copyright 1936, ARRL |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|