Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old July 1st 06, 02:52 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 37
Default Why listen to shortwave when you can use the internet to listen


"Merlin3rd" wrote in message
oups.com...
Shortwave is DEAD. Use your computer to listen to a vast arrray of
radio broadcasts from anywhere in the world. No radio, no antenna, no
static. Shortwave broadcasting is old tech, dying fast.


Birdwatching is dead, why not just look at pictures of birds online.

Oh yeah... a person's hobby
(birdwatching, shortwave, coin collecting etc.)
is fun and exciting to him/her. Not dead
at all, full of life, satisfaction and the thrill of discovery.

What's dead is your mind, and your personality if you have to get
attention/satisfaction by trolling a newsgroup.


  #12   Report Post  
Old July 1st 06, 04:16 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
Default Why listen to shortwave when you can use the internet to listen


dxAce wrote:
Merlin3rd wrote:

Shortwave is DEAD. Use your computer to listen to a vast arrray of
radio broadcasts from anywhere in the world. No radio, no antenna, no
static. Shortwave broadcasting is old tech, dying fast.


Yada, yada, yada. We already knew that so you'd best be running along.

dxAce
Michigan
USA



Mostly, garbage is being broadcast now - religion and boring news.
Shortwave is nothing like it used to be. Listening to hams and
ultilities is also
boring. More and more broadcasters are dropping shortwave and going to
either the
Internet, or AM. Once "Voice of the Andes", which I regularly listened
to, back in the
1960s and 1970s stopped broadcasting, and the BBC stopped broadcasting
to the US, I knew shortwave was dead. So, what is the point of
plopping down hundreds of
dollars for new receivers - most receivers are basically the same and
get the
same stations. Why spend $500 for an Eaton **** E1, when one can spend
$65 for a Degen 1103.

  #13   Report Post  
Old July 1st 06, 04:58 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default Why listen to shortwave when you can use the internet to listen

Computers (ala the internet) require continuous maintnance and
upkeep.(just like a woman) My cheap old beat up Goodwill store radios
continue (most of them anyway) to work ok and require no maintnance.
cuhulin

  #14   Report Post  
Old July 1st 06, 05:03 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default Why listen to shortwave when you can use the internet to listen

Voice of the Andes.Those people over there live to high up on those
Mountains.They don't get enough Oxygen to think straight.
cuhulin

  #15   Report Post  
Old July 1st 06, 06:04 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
Default Why listen to shortwave when you can use the internet to listen

In ews.net gravity
wrote:

"Merlin3rd" wrote in message
oups.com...
Shortwave is DEAD. Use your computer to listen to a vast arrray of
radio broadcasts from anywhere in the world. No radio, no antenna, no
static. Shortwave broadcasting is old tech, dying fast.


shortwave plus dipole = $200

ten years of internet access = $1000

Gravity



Yay Gravity!! You've actually read my mind. Try getting radio on a
computer somewhere like southern New Mexico. No wifi-, pay through the
nose for dial-up internet, and shakey at best. That VS: $60 for a Kaito
KA1103 that you just turn on. You'll find *something* for sure. Radio
Nederland and CBC *still* put out a good signal. Plus you get the
satisfaction of being *connected* the way people were for the better
part of the 20th century. Still more interesting too than just typing
in yet another URL. There's no fun in that. To the Choir, sorry for
feeding trolls but I still like my shortwaves. Too, shortwave's going
to continue as long as there are parts of the population who can't
afford internet access.

Just my .02 worth.


  #16   Report Post  
Old July 1st 06, 06:10 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 5
Default Why listen to shortwave when you can use the internet to listen

In t Sanjaya wrote:

"Merlin3rd" wrote in message
oups.com...
Shortwave is DEAD. Use your computer to listen to a vast arrray of
radio broadcasts from anywhere in the world. No radio, no antenna, no
static. Shortwave broadcasting is old tech, dying fast.


Birdwatching is dead, why not just look at pictures of birds online.

Oh yeah... a person's hobby
(birdwatching, shortwave, coin collecting etc.)
is fun and exciting to him/her. Not dead
at all, full of life, satisfaction and the thrill of discovery.

What's dead is your mind, and your personality if you have to get
attention/satisfaction by trolling a newsgroup.



Seems like he's doing this because he's too short minded to learn how to
actually try and enjoy his radio!
  #17   Report Post  
Old July 1st 06, 08:01 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 237
Default Why listen to shortwave when you can use the internet to listen

In article .com,
Steve wrote:

Merlin3rd wrote:
Shortwave is DEAD. Use your computer to listen to a vast arrray of
radio broadcasts from anywhere in the world. No radio, no antenna, no
static. Shortwave broadcasting is old tech, dying fast.


Do you have the URL for the Coast Guard frequencies?


Try

http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/marcomms/gmdss/msi.htm

Or somewhere around there.

Mark Zenier
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)


  #18   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 06, 01:55 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 14
Default Why listen to shortwave when you can use the internet to listen

And don't forget Satellite Radio
Merlin3rd wrote:
Shortwave is DEAD. Use your computer to listen to a vast arrray of
radio broadcasts from anywhere in the world. No radio, no antenna, no
static. Shortwave broadcasting is old tech, dying fast.


  #20   Report Post  
Old July 2nd 06, 05:54 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default Why listen to shortwave when you can use the internet to listen

He likes to hear them women in them porn internet movie clips
howling.OOOPS!
cuhulin

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Idine Ghoreishian -by- Idine Ghoreishian { The SPGC Antenna by RHF } RHF Shortwave 6 May 22nd 06 07:38 AM
AMERICA AND STATE-RUN DRM "PUBLIC" RADIO SHORTWAVE BROADCASTING RHF Shortwave 13 May 17th 06 04:11 AM
FYI - Shortwave Radio Listener (SWL) Groups on YAHOO ! [email protected] Shortwave 4 September 18th 05 02:25 PM
"Shortwave is actually experiencing a resurgence" Mike Terry Shortwave 22 April 29th 05 03:54 AM
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna RHF Shortwave 1 January 24th 05 09:37 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017