That's what you have to decide.

SC

Slow Code wrote:
That's what you have to decide.

SC
no it isn't
CW as a licenseing requiremtn is on life support and the plug will be
pulled soon

CB has nothing to to do with it

RHF wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
That's what you have to decide.

SC

SC - 10-4 Good Buddy ! ) ~ RHF

I give Honor and Respect to any Amateur Radio {Ham} Operator :
Who has built and uses his own Receiver and CW Transmitter
for regular CW use. I will gladly read their posts and listen to
their arguments as to "Why" CW is important to the ARS.
- BUT - "IF" all they have every done is bought ready-made
equipment and claim that CW is necessary to the ARS
- please don't waste my time.

BTW any coment on No tech has bulilt and uses (when he can someone else
to talk ) a ^M AM rig one tube and all old type of design (based on an
old ham 5 meter unit)
.
.
. .

an old feind wrote:

RHF wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
That's what you have to decide.

SC

SC - 10-4 Good Buddy ! ) ~ RHF

I give Honor and Respect to any Amateur Radio {Ham} Operator :
Who has built and uses his own Receiver and CW Transmitter
for regular CW use. I will gladly read their posts and listen to
their arguments as to "Why" CW is important to the ARS.
- BUT - "IF" all they have every done is bought ready-made
equipment and claim that CW is necessary to the ARS
- please don't waste my time.

BTW any coment on No tech has bulilt and uses (when he can someone else
to talk ) a ^M AM rig one tube and all old type of design (based on an
old ham 5 meter unit)

Translation?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"g. beat" @spam protected wrote in
:

"Slow Code" wrote in message
news

That's what you have to decide.

SC


Personally, I would rather have the First Class and Second Class Radio
Telephone back. Thank the broadcasters for lobbying to eliminate that
requirement -- ironic that the industry has been sliding ever since (go
figure) --

That's what happens when you lower standards, why hams don't realize that,
I'll never know. Maybe it's just laziness.

SC

Bill Turner wrote:

Construction/design skills and operating skills are two different
things. What does one have to do with the other?

Did you build your own car? Dishwasher? Toaster? Razor?


Why, certainly....and as soon as I stop these multiple, deep lacerations
gushing red, I'll delve a bit deeper into the ...


Honey..is that ambulance here yet? I'm getting real faint.....

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:14:26 -0400, Dave wrote:


Bill, I had a master machinist work for me in the 1960s. He could make ANYTHING!!

I asked him if he could make a car. Sure!! His reply: "All I need is a block of
steel 6X6X20 feet, a large milling machine, and a large lathe."

He was a Ham Radio Operator, Collins stuff of the 60s.

/s/ DD W1MCE

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

The question was not if you "could" build you own car, it was "did"
you.

Bill, W6WRT

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On 25 Jul 2006 13:40:18 -0700, "RHF"
wrote:

BT - One Word : "Amateur" {Ham} as in Operator ~ RHF

All 'others' for the most part are 'appliance operators'
just like so many CB'ers - IMHO.
.

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Nope. It's "Amateur Radio Operator", not "Amateur Radio Constructor".

I'll ask again: What does construction skill have to do with operator
skill?

Bill, W6WRT