Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just what the Bushies need, more poor people ****ed-off at them for
sucking more fat-cat dick. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 1:45?pm, David wrote:
Just what the Bushies need, more poor people ****ed-off at them for sucking more fat-cat dick. The sole-source, non-competitive bid to iNiquity, of our free airways, is a travesty. Here are my comments from a recent Washington Post article that addresses this issue: "The FCC Tunes Into HD Radio--And May Turn Off Distant AM" http://blog.washingtonpost.com/faste...d_radio_n.html Here are my comments, from that article: "The FCC has just given away our free airwaves to a few corporate thugs, including iBiquity Digital Corporation. Especially on AM, HD/ IBOC causes adjacent-channel interference, which I have confirmed listening to WTWP in Wash., D.C.- the digital sidebands are over- powering on 1490 and 1510 and would clobber any existing stations on those frequencies. Few HD radios have been sold, as consumers have not bought into this farce. This whole setup is just to the advantage of the HD Radio Alliance, as they own most of the 1,200 stations broadcasting in HD - the small mom-and-pop stations have lost coverage and will probably disappear. This FCC sole-source, non-competitive contract award to iBiquity is a total travesty !" Think about adding your comments - looks like the reporter is fishing for a follow-up story. There is a large group of us that have been contacting the major newspapers that have run stories on HD Radio and emailing them various HD Radio articles, especially this one: "HD Radio on the Offense" http://www.eastbayexpress.com/2007-0...on-the-offense We have heard back from some of the reporters. Try Google Blog search for "HD Radio" and add your comments to every HD Radio blog that you have time for. Although authorized by the FCC, they have left it up to the marketplace to decide its fate - it is far from a done-deal, as HD/ IBOC supporters would have you believe. With almost total consumer apathy, HD Radio will probably fail, as AM Stereo did in the 1980's. Use your voice - you will be heard ! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David" wrote in message ... Just what the Bushies need, more poor people ****ed-off at them for sucking more fat-cat dick. Better you save your stinking breath for that job interview. You'll need some serious cash to buy that flatscreen HDTV very soon. Your favorite standard definition propaganda TV station is about to go dark on you. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 1, 10:45 am, David wrote:
Just what the Bushies need, more poor people ****ed-off at them for sucking more fat-cat dick. How has my receiver gotten crippled? Think like a normal radio user for a bit. The radio still picks up signals and plays them, right? So? What's the problem? It would be something else if the radio were totally unuseable, as will happen with analog TV sets that are not hooked up to CATV services post-2009. Or like when the UK shifted its TV service from VHF channels with 405 lines of resolution to UHF with 625 lines. -- Stephanie (no, I don't like IBOC either) Weil New York City, USA |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 Apr 2007 11:57:57 -0700, "Stephanie Weil"
wrote: On Apr 1, 10:45 am, David wrote: Just what the Bushies need, more poor people ****ed-off at them for sucking more fat-cat dick. How has my receiver gotten crippled? Think like a normal radio user for a bit. The radio still picks up signals and plays them, right? So? What's the problem? It would be something else if the radio were totally unuseable, as will happen with analog TV sets that are not hooked up to CATV services post-2009. Or like when the UK shifted its TV service from VHF channels with 405 lines of resolution to UHF with 625 lines. The IBOC signal takes up 5 channels. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 3, 11:14 pm, David wrote:
The IBOC signal takes up 5 channels. My point is, Is the radio still PLAYING and picking up a station? steph |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Apr 2007 07:01:04 -0700, "Stephanie Weil"
wrote: On Apr 3, 11:14 pm, David wrote: The IBOC signal takes up 5 channels. My point is, Is the radio still PLAYING and picking up a station? steph Not as many as before. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Step and Brenda,,, tell those Assholes in that phonograph room I says to
kiss my ass and go to HELL!!!!! cuhulin |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't think step loves this old Southern boy.
I don't have to climb a rope to get to my home though. .......Larry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 4, 4:50 pm, blitz wrote:
Three in my location completely obliterate 120khz of extra bandwidth (and some stations offering content I can't get here). I think that's probably a problem with your particular receiver - too wide-band? I have some cheap-ass AM radios that will only pick up three or four of the big guns at various parts on the dial. Sometimes one over the other. That's a worst case scenario anyway But most consumer radios - especially the no-brand/off-brand types - are not very selective when it comes to the MW band anymore. -- Stephanie Weil New York City, USA |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eye-On-IBOC - Looking for Information about IBOC and HD Radio | Shortwave | |||
** One Million FR.EE Visitors ** | Homebrew | |||
100+million now cannot see your ads! | Scanner | |||
100+million now cannot see your ads! | General | |||
$200 million a day. | Shortwave |