Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am in the market for a relatively low cost SW radio. I was looking at a
Kaito 1102 or 1103 (or the Degen equiv) and stumbled on an 1101 at a surplus store. I was wondering how the 1101 compares to the 1102 or 1103 or should I be looking elsewhere altogether? TIA, Joeb |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() jb wrote: I am in the market for a relatively low cost SW radio. I was looking at a Kaito 1102 or 1103 (or the Degen equiv) and stumbled on an 1101 at a surplus store. I was wondering how the 1101 compares to the 1102 or 1103 or should I be looking elsewhere altogether? TIA, Joeb The 1103 is better in many ways. Take a look at the reviews on Radiointel.com for details. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jb" wrote in message news ![]() I am in the market for a relatively low cost SW radio. I was looking at a Kaito 1102 or 1103 (or the Degen equiv) and stumbled on an 1101 at a surplus store. I was wondering how the 1101 compares to the 1102 or 1103 or should I be looking elsewhere altogether? TIA, Joeb There have been many, many posts in rec.radio.shortwave about the virtues of the 1103. I'd recommend it to anyone interested in a quality, low cost SW portable. See if this helps you out... http://makeashorterlink.com/?B2D012B4C |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:34:45 +0000, Sanjaya wrote:
There have been many, many posts in rec.radio.shortwave about the virtues of the 1103. I'd recommend it to anyone interested in a quality, low cost SW portable. See if this helps you out... http://makeashorterlink.com/?B2D012B4C I've seen lots of comments regarding the 1103 and the 1102, not as many for the 1101. Cost is a concern here and I am able to get the 1101 for about $20us (shipped) less than the others. What I am really interested in is the SW comparison between the three. Joeb ps thanks for the link. I didn't know you could do that! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "jb" wrote in message news ![]() On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 17:34:45 +0000, Sanjaya wrote: There have been many, many posts in rec.radio.shortwave about the virtues of the 1103. I'd recommend it to anyone interested in a quality, low cost SW portable. See if this helps you out... http://makeashorterlink.com/?B2D012B4C I've seen lots of comments regarding the 1103 and the 1102, not as many for the 1101. Cost is a concern here and I am able to get the 1101 for about $20us (shipped) less than the others. What I am really interested in is the SW comparison between the three. Joeb I don't have an 1101, but I do have a Degen DE1102 and DE1103. Both were cheaper than the Kaito versions, but I gave up the US warranty of the Kaito versions. Both have been great and have had no problems, though the 1103 was manufactured after August 2004 when they fixed a problem some radios had with the tuning knob. There's a review of the 1101 here http://www.radiointel.com/review-kaitoka1101.htm Part of the review says this: quote Shortwave..this is where the KA1101 really shines. The 1101 breaks its shortwave coverage into two bands. 3 - 10 MHz is called SW1. 10-26.1 MHz is the SW2 band. Up/down steps are 5 kHz and there is no fine tuning capability. Reception is exceptional just off the whip antenna. In the late afternoon on the east coast, I was easily receiving stations in the 16, 22, 25, 3, 41 and 49 meter bands. WWV on 15 MHz was fairly good copy. The wide/narrow filter is effective on shortwave as does the DX/Local attenuator control. Note that the 1101 does not receive single sideband. The 1102 model does, however. As you tune through the 12 defined "shortwave bands", the band is shown on the display (i.e., 19 M). I found the 1101 to be the equal of the Sangean 606 and the Radio Shack DX-375/396. The use of the included extended antenna wire plugged into the external antenna jack improved reception slightly. Perhaps this is more of a benefit in weaker signal areas. I also tried a real external longwire antenna. It created an overload situation for the 1101. end quote The 1102 and 1103 have SSB capability, the 1101 doesn't. The 1103 has better speaker sound than the 1102 and 1101. (Though I don't have an 1101 this is easily assumed due to the size of the radios) The 1103 has detractors who hate the ergonomics. I had no problem with them. Five minutes of using the radio and it wasn't an issue. The 1103 is the most sensitive SW off the whip antenna I've ever used. Speaking for myself, as owner of a 1103, 1102, Sony 7600GR (great radio, but 3 times the cost of the Degens), YB400 and other portables, and knowing what I know now about all of them, I'd not hesitate to purchase or recommend an 1103. No contest. Performance per $$$ spent is hands down the best with the DE1103. If you can't raise the extra $20 get the 1101. If you can find a way to buy an 1103 that is what you should do. Note the above comment about the manufacture date though. There was a small piece of paper included with NIB models showing the date, and the DE1103s after August 2004 had an additional round sticker on the front. Note also that these are my opinions. Some other people who contribute to this group share the same opinions. Still others will disagree strongly. In fact, you will be judged as unpatriotic for spending any amount on a radio made in China. Get what you can afford and enjoy it : ) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have the 1101 and the 1103. The 1103 has much richer audio, SSB
and the ability to off tune a frequency to get away from interference. The 1101 tune SW in 5kHz steps. The only thing I can think of that the 1101 is better at is in battery consumption. It is very easy on batteries while the 1103 chews thru them in short order. Bob |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I see some sales on eBay now offering the Kaito KA-1102 for $64.95 +
$9.95 shipping. This is the one I have, it fits in my shirt pockets & seems well made as it has been dropped a few times with no damage. George S., MN |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John: The 1101 uses three batteries and as I mentioned they last a
long time. I have discovered, however , that the top battery seems to run down about twice as fast as the two that lie further down. Every time the radio quits I find that the two good batteries are only 1/2 exhausted. The third battery is dead. Generally I find a half dead battery and pop it in and I'm good to go for a long time. I did the same as you with regards to the 1103. I got some Energizer 2500 ma nimh batteries and they do me for about a month of erratic useage ( maybe an hour a day, I am not certain). I didn't time the alkalines I used the first time but I checked them on the multimeter before I inserted them and then checked again after about 5 hours use and found that they were down significantly. I have used the Kaito supplied AC adapter and it works OK for MW and some of the ham bands but introduces a hum on the 9 mHz band. It also allows noise from the powerlines into the radio and markedly increases background noise. Bob |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() jb wrote: Any thoughts or comments on how the 1103 might compare to the Tecsun PL-230? Joeb On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:19:00 -0800, bobmendria wrote: I have the 1101 and the 1103. The 1103 has much richer audio, SSB and the ability to off tune a frequency to get away from interference. The 1101 tune SW in 5kHz steps. The only thing I can think of that the 1101 is better at is in battery consumption. It is very easy on batteries while the 1103 chews thru them in short order. Bob Here's a very good review: http://www.radiointel.com/review-tecsunpl230.htm I haven't used the 230, but for me two features are glaringly missing: ssb capability and a tuning knob. If broadcast signal capabilities are what you are looking for then this could be a good choice. Consider also the Tecsun PL-350. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kaito KA 1101 | Swap | |||
KAITO KA105 Question | Shortwave | |||
Kaito KA105 & overload ; how bad | Shortwave | |||
Kaito 1102 - 1101 , What's the difference ? | Shortwave | |||
Kaito WRX-911 quality control issues? | Shortwave |