| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
August 22nd 06, 03:19 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
why not deal with the eal issue
an old friend wrote: Douche Bag wrote: IT'S DEAD. Get a life. You learned code for nothing. Where's my iPod? wel you got that part aprt Code being dead but the ARS is still alive dispite the efforts of Sloaw code Robeson and others to kill it Isnt that the main point tho.... they have no power to do anything... They are just sad ppl with nothing better to do. Next they will be saying that you should have to pay a monthly fee to use the airwaves... Maybe have a subscription fee, that would stop most of the scum (yeh right) |
|
#2
August 22nd 06, 03:56 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
why not deal with the real issue
Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Douche Bag wrote: IT'S DEAD. Get a life. You learned code for nothing. Where's my iPod? wel you got that part aprt Code being dead but the ARS is still alive dispite the efforts of Sloaw code Robeson and others to kill it Isnt that the main point tho.... they have no power to do anything... They are just sad ppl with nothing better to do. Next they will be saying that you should have to pay a monthly fee to use the airwaves... Maybe have a subscription fee, that would stop most of the scum (yeh right) well a GMRS like license would surely do better asa filter than the code test look at the code tested ham we have on the air now |
|
#3
August 22nd 06, 04:22 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
why not deal with the real issue
an old friend wrote: Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Douche Bag wrote: IT'S DEAD. Get a life. You learned code for nothing. Where's my iPod? wel you got that part aprt Code being dead but the ARS is still alive dispite the efforts of Sloaw code Robeson and others to kill it Isnt that the main point tho.... they have no power to do anything... They are just sad ppl with nothing better to do. Next they will be saying that you should have to pay a monthly fee to use the airwaves... Maybe have a subscription fee, that would stop most of the scum (yeh right) well a GMRS like license would surely do better asa filter than the code test look at the code tested ham we have on the air now What part of the GMRS license would be a better filter? The 5 year duration between renewals, the $75/£40 charge or just the general way of applying for it? Im not saying i disagree, just wondering what you meant.. |
|
#4
August 22nd 06, 04:26 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
why not deal with the real issue
Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Douche Bag wrote: IT'S DEAD. Get a life. You learned code for nothing. Where's my iPod? wel you got that part aprt Code being dead but the ARS is still alive dispite the efforts of Sloaw code Robeson and others to kill it Isnt that the main point tho.... they have no power to do anything... They are just sad ppl with nothing better to do. Next they will be saying that you should have to pay a monthly fee to use the airwaves... Maybe have a subscription fee, that would stop most of the scum (yeh right) well a GMRS like license would surely do better asa filter than the code test look at the code tested ham we have on the air now What part of the GMRS license would be a better filter? The 5 year duration between renewals, the $75/£40 charge or just the general way of applying for it? Im not saying i disagree, just wondering what you meant.. having to pay to use the ARS freqs might be more of a deterant to those with bad attiudes than a code test not to say it would be a good filter but fee for license with the license fee used for enforcement here in the state the license is free (the tests cost something) and the FCC is always complaining it laks any funding to go after ham violators I suspect you are a brit and so this might escape you I should have been clearer nice to see someone serious paying attention here I had assume the flamers and trolls had driven them off |
|
#5
August 23rd 06, 03:34 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
why not deal with the real issue
an old friend wrote: Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Douche Bag wrote: IT'S DEAD. Get a life. You learned code for nothing. Where's my iPod? wel you got that part aprt Code being dead but the ARS is still alive dispite the efforts of Sloaw code Robeson and others to kill it Isnt that the main point tho.... they have no power to do anything.... They are just sad ppl with nothing better to do. Next they will be saying that you should have to pay a monthly fee to use the airwaves... Maybe have a subscription fee, that would stop most of the scum (yeh right) well a GMRS like license would surely do better asa filter than the code test look at the code tested ham we have on the air now What part of the GMRS license would be a better filter? The 5 year duration between renewals, the $75/£40 charge or just the general way of applying for it? Im not saying i disagree, just wondering what you meant.. having to pay to use the ARS freqs might be more of a deterant to those with bad attiudes than a code test not to say it would be a good filter but fee for license with the license fee used for enforcement here in the state the license is free (the tests cost something) and the FCC is always complaining it laks any funding to go after ham violators I suspect you are a brit and so this might escape you I should have been clearer nice to see someone serious paying attention here I had assume the flamers and trolls had driven them off Yep, im british. I can see your point about the FCC complaints, lack of funding is the usual reason for them not to bother to go after ham violators. If they charged users then they would be able to use that money to go after the retards who clog todays airwaves... And the flamers/trolls havent driven us all off, we just go into hiding until we see something of interest, and just ignore the rest... |
|
#6
August 23rd 06, 03:40 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
why not deal with the real issue
Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Douche Bag wrote: IT'S DEAD. Get a life. You learned code for nothing. Where's my iPod? wel you got that part aprt Code being dead but the ARS is still alive dispite the efforts of Sloaw code Robeson and others to kill it Isnt that the main point tho.... they have no power to do anything... They are just sad ppl with nothing better to do. Next they will be saying that you should have to pay a monthly fee to use the airwaves... Maybe have a subscription fee, that would stop most of the scum (yeh right) well a GMRS like license would surely do better asa filter than the code test look at the code tested ham we have on the air now What part of the GMRS license would be a better filter? The 5 year duration between renewals, the $75/£40 charge or just the general way of applying for it? Im not saying i disagree, just wondering what you meant.. having to pay to use the ARS freqs might be more of a deterant to those with bad attiudes than a code test not to say it would be a good filter but fee for license with the license fee used for enforcement here in the state the license is free (the tests cost something) and the FCC is always complaining it laks any funding to go after ham violators I suspect you are a brit and so this might escape you I should have been clearer nice to see someone serious paying attention here I had assume the flamers and trolls had driven them off Yep, im british. I can see your point about the FCC complaints, lack of funding is the usual reason for them not to bother to go after ham violators. If they charged users then they would be able to use that money to go after the retards who clog todays airwaves... And the flamers/trolls havent driven us all off, we just go into hiding until we see something of interest, and just ignore the rest... indeed but you can't discuss any changes as I suspect you have ntoiced and for that matter I have never seen why we have to have all of us geting our license by the same path indeed I have always liked an idea with some folks talking a rule and safety test (and being confined to built equipment) and pay a fee while others would takerigourous test and no fees |
|
#7
August 23rd 06, 03:46 AM
posted to alt.radio.scanner,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
|
|||
|
|||
|
why not deal with the real issue
an Old friend wrote: Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Bakb0ne wrote: an old friend wrote: Douche Bag wrote: IT'S DEAD. Get a life. You learned code for nothing. Where's my iPod? wel you got that part aprt Code being dead but the ARS is still alive dispite the efforts of Sloaw code Robeson and others to kill it Isnt that the main point tho.... they have no power to do anything... They are just sad ppl with nothing better to do. Next they will be saying that you should have to pay a monthly fee to use the airwaves... Maybe have a subscription fee, that would stop most of the scum (yeh right) well a GMRS like license would surely do better asa filter than the code test look at the code tested ham we have on the air now What part of the GMRS license would be a better filter? The 5 year duration between renewals, the $75/£40 charge or just the general way of applying for it? Im not saying i disagree, just wondering what you meant.. having to pay to use the ARS freqs might be more of a deterant to those with bad attiudes than a code test not to say it would be a good filter but fee for license with the license fee used for enforcement here in the state the license is free (the tests cost something) and the FCC is always complaining it laks any funding to go after ham violators I suspect you are a brit and so this might escape you I should have been clearer nice to see someone serious paying attention here I had assume the flamers and trolls had driven them off Yep, im british. I can see your point about the FCC complaints, lack of funding is the usual reason for them not to bother to go after ham violators. If they charged users then they would be able to use that money to go after the retards who clog todays airwaves... And the flamers/trolls havent driven us all off, we just go into hiding until we see something of interest, and just ignore the rest... indeed but you can't discuss any changes as I suspect you have ntoiced and for that matter I have never seen why we have to have all of us geting our license by the same path indeed I have always liked an idea with some folks talking a rule and safety test (and being confined to built equipment) and pay a fee while others would takerigourous test and no fees So basically ur saying that you should be able to either 1. Pay for your license and Take a beginner test (to prove your competent) or 2. Take a Intermediate Test and get free license after passing If this is what you mean, then i can see your logic and i would fully support a system like this... Only problem is that just like Slow Code and the other trolls who try to change the Ham world, we wouldnt be able to do anything either, its down to the corporations, not us little people... |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications? | General | |||
| Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
| Hey Twist!!!! | CB | |||
| Amateur Radio "outside the box" | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
