Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I could support that. SC |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 07 Sep 2006 23:50:10 GMT, Slow Code spake
thusly: I could support that. I could not. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... I could support that. SC Even if the no-code ticket was made 6 months or 2 years in active length it would not matter one bit. Amateur radio in the public eye is unknown and your average young person is far more interested in the Internet, online video, instant text messaging and cellphones. There are too many commercially available technologies, which are far cheaper I may add, than amateur radio which while a curosity is still a functionally and technologically obsolete pursuit. Sorry but that's the truth. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No support.
"Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... I could support that. SC -- SeeYaa ![]() When American Citizens with dual citizenship pledges allegiance to the flag, to which flag do they pledge allegiance too? - |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Get a life......
"Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... I could support that. SC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on
code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code. Slow Code wrote: I could support that. SC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Douche Bag wrote: The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code. not dead dispite the efforts folks like the arrl and slow code to kill it |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag"
wrote: The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code. Slow Code wrote: I could support that. SC Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice, or a little bit of effort. The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it won't happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in this neck of the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters. -- -fb- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"etagg" wrote in
: Get a life...... Get a real license. Sc |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
funkbastler wrote in
news ![]() On 8 Sep 2006 19:28:20 -0700, "Douche Bag" wrote: The hobby is dead because of all these old ham geriatrics stuck on code. No one in the real world gives a **** about code. Slow Code wrote: I could support that. SC Code is dead - along with anything else that requires skill, practice, or a little bit of effort. The folks who want to do away with code should at least learn it and try it - they might find it to be (gasp) enjoyable. Personally, I could support doing away with no-code licensing altogether. I realize it won't happen, but I gotta think that if I managed to learn Morse code, then so can "they". The only thing no-code licensing accomplished in this neck of the woods was to move the CB mentality from 11 to 2 meters. There is no arguing that. KB9RQZ is living proof. SC |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Proof of the Necessity of Amatuer Radio | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | CB | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy |