http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...iewnews&id=414

"Icom Guy" wrote in message
.. .
http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...iewnews&id=414



Does that mean I can't chat with my ZL friends on CW anymore?

Dan/W4NTI

Correct and being you that you are speachless you might as well give me
your radios so I can sell them to someone that know s how to use them.

Dan/W4NTI wrote:

"Icom Guy" wrote in message
.. .

http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...iewnews&id=414




Does that mean I can't chat with my ZL friends on CW anymore?

Dan/W4NTI

On 16 Jun 2004 18:32:09 EDT, lid wrote:

Correct and being you that you are speachless you might as well give me
your radios so I can sell them to someone that know s how to use them.

Dan/W4NTI wrote:

And use some of the money to buy a dictionary. "Speachless"....???

With this, and BPL, we now in the New AGE! Question?? who will be the lucky
recipient of the first
"Worked all I.S.P.'s" on BPL?? As the old chinese curse goes: "May you
live in interesting times" !!
NN7K

--
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number
of electrons were terribly inconvenienced !

" People who never get carried away, should be! " --- Malcom Forbes

"The Maj" wrote in message
news
On 16 Jun 2004 18:32:09 EDT, lid wrote:

Correct and being you that you are speachless you might as well give me
your radios so I can sell them to someone that know s how to use them.

Dan/W4NTI wrote:

And use some of the money to buy a dictionary. "Speachless"....???

So are you going to sell them to me? Computer spell checkers are
worthless aren't they. The radio does have a microphone input so get
my drift? Speachless was what I wanted to say. ...---...

-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.. . -. --- ... .--. .- --

..- .-.. ... --- . ...- -.. --- .- ... .... . .- -.-. ....
--- -. - .... . .- -. -.. .-.. .. -. -.. --- ..- - .... --- .--

-- ..- -.-. .... ... - ..- ..-. ..-. -.-. --- -- . ..- .--.

--... ...--

..--- --- .... -.





The Maj wrote:

On 16 Jun 2004 18:32:09 EDT, lid wrote:


Correct and being you that you are speachless you might as well give me
your radios so I can sell them to someone that know s how to use them.

Dan/W4NTI wrote:


And use some of the money to buy a dictionary. "Speachless"....???

No you don't get it I want to say speach less (talk less) and use
phone instead of CW.



Bill Turner wrote:
On 16 Jun 2004 21:42:48 EDT, lid wrote:


The radio does have a microphone input so get
my drift? Speachless was what I wanted to say.


__________________________________________________ _______

You still don't get it... the word is "speechless".

To quote from www.dictionary.com "No entry found for speachless."

--
Bill, W6WRT
QSLs via LoTW

wrote in message
...
No you don't get it I want to say speach less (talk less) and use
phone instead of CW.


No, apparently YOU are still failing to understand what he is referring to:

To quote from www.dictionary.com "No entry found for speach."



Bill Turner wrote:
On 16 Jun 2004 21:42:48 EDT, lid wrote:


The radio does have a microphone input so get
my drift? Speachless was what I wanted to say.


__________________________________________________ _______

You still don't get it... the word is "speechless".

To quote from www.dictionary.com "No entry found for speachless."

--
Bill, W6WRT
QSLs via LoTW

In article , Bill Turner
wrote:

On Thu, 17 Jun 2004 16:54:37 +1000, "Marty"
wrote:

No, apparently YOU are still failing to understand what he is referring to:

To quote from www.dictionary.com "No entry found for speach."

__________________________________________________ _______

This is TOO funny!

You are so right. Actually it's more sad than funny. What sad shape we
are in when we must bicker about little things like this. To the rest
of the world, what is morse code? Some anecdote in a history lesson? In
the mean time, the most vocal proponents of CW seem to be some
individuals more inclined to insult and misspell than to make an
intellectual argument in support of their position. The bottom line is
that the debate is more about passion and feeling than it is about
reason and intellect. I feel sure that the FCC will shortly make a
ruling, and it will be based on the cold hard facts and financial
reason. It is cheaper and easier for them when there are less
requirements, and so they will abolish it. It is only a question of
"when", not a question of "if".

You have two choices. Embrace change, or fight it. Since it will happen
anyway, fighting will only cause you heart ache and grief.

Your opinions may vary from mine, in fact I am sure they do, but when
time bears my comments out you will be sure to remember I shared them.

--
--Chip
remove dots in prefix to fix email address


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Yeh, Chip, think they ALREADY have made THAT decision! 1-) That AMATEUR
RADIO
has become little more than an OVERGROWN Citizens Band. 2-) That the
SPECTRUM
is worth BUCKS, to Private individuals , and Corperations ( Need I mention
new services
such as B.P.L. ?). 3) There are places for the "Hobbyists" , such as 11
meters to conduct
ALL those wishing to "Play" with radio. , And, 4- ) Whatever experimenting
that leads to
any new worthy discovery,from amateur radio, is MINIMAL, if not NON-EXISTANT
relative to the services that can be rendered by Government/Private
consortiums!
Translation: We have met the enemy, and they are US ! (Pogo) NN7K
--
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number
of electrons were terribly inconvenienced !

Chip wrote:

You are so right. Actually it's more sad than funny. What sad shape we
are in when we must bicker about little things like this. To the rest
of the world, what is morse code? Some anecdote in a history lesson? In
the mean time, the most vocal proponents of CW seem to be some
individuals more inclined to insult and misspell than to make an
intellectual argument in support of their position. The bottom line is
that the debate is more about passion and feeling than it is about
reason and intellect. I feel sure that the FCC will shortly make a
ruling, and it will be based on the cold hard facts and financial
reason. It is cheaper and easier for them when there are less
requirements, and so they will abolish it. It is only a question of
"when", not a question of "if".

You have two choices. Embrace change, or fight it. Since it will happen
anyway, fighting will only cause you heart ache and grief.

Your opinions may vary from mine, in fact I am sure they do, but when
time bears my comments out you will be sure to remember I shared them.

--
--Chip
remove dots in prefix to fix email address


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----