Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#201
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:27:26 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Al Klein wrote: wrote: You denigrate the resistor code. Not at all. It's a lot better than having the value printed on the resistor in numbers. Even with MIL quality and transparent coatings, the numbers on 1/8 watt resistors are kind of hard to read. Even with the resistor color code, most of us *MEMORIZED* a jingle like: Bad Boys Rape Our Young Girls But Violet Gives Willingly I believe the military used to teach their technicians to *MEMORIZE* that jingle. Exactly how does one develop the resistor color code from first principles? One doesn't, but "first principles" has nothing to do with this discussion - a fact you still don't understand. |
#202
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:39:11 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: wrote: I learned the formulas ... Did you *Heaven Forbid* memorize any formulas? I'll bet he didn't derive the shapes of the written numbers from first principles either. |
#203
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Al Klein wrote: On 11 Aug 2006 15:54:33 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: Al Klein wrote: On 11 Aug 2006 07:57:47 -0700, "an old friend" wrote: the issue is simple some folks want to claim other folks that took and passed the tests equire by by law are somehow "cheating" If you can't even understand the issue, why do you keep opening your mouth and proving it? but I do uderstand the issue Then why do you keep pretending that you don't? but I don't I do understand your public snit the real issue not the smoke screen you are trying to blow (wether your own one you have been brainwashed into accepting I think I know what I'm claiming a little better than you do. not likely nor did I say you were climing something othe r than you are claiming I am simply accusing not telling being honest about why you are making the claim your beef has nothing to do with the tests it is to do with end of the Hazing ritual that is a bout to occour you are just not honest to amdit (perhaps not even to yourself) you your concern is for the service the fact is that your problem is being hung up on the notion I did so you must |
#204
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
Al Klein wrote: On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:32:51 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: all he can do presently is pass the present day test requirements and then be belittled For claiming that the tests prove that he knows as much as those who passed much more difficult tests, not for not having to pass those more difficult tests. who has made any such claim? you like a lot of the procoders add a lot of things to what people are realy saying |
#205
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
Al Klein wrote:
Showing that you DON'T know the difference. I personally don't care why the unit of resistance is named the ohm. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#206
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
Al Klein wrote:
I'll bet he didn't derive the shapes of the written numbers from first principles either. That fact goes against your "memorizing is evil" argument. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
#207
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On 11 Aug 2006 18:51:28 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote: Al Klein wrote: I think I know what I'm claiming a little better than you do. not likely Very juvenile of you. your beef has nothing to do with the tests it is to do with end of the Hazing ritual that is a bout to occour There's a hazing rule in ham radio? Since when? |
#208
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 02:16:22 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Al Klein wrote: Showing that you DON'T know the difference. I personally don't care why the unit of resistance is named the ohm. Which has nothing to do with the discussion. |
#209
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 02:18:17 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Al Klein wrote: One doesn't, but "first principles" has nothing to do with this discussion - a fact you still don't understand. There's two ways to learn: 1. Memorize knowledge, 2. develop knowledge from first principles. Which has nothing to do with the difference between memorizing answers and learning theory. |
#210
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 02:19:22 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote: Al Klein wrote: I'll bet he didn't derive the shapes of the written numbers from first principles either. That fact goes against your "memorizing is evil" argument. And against your claim to understand the conversation. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue | Shortwave |