Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#281
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
L. wrote: "jawod" wrote in message ... RE-READ IT - there were TWO people here in the beginning "splitting hairs" about the use of or perhaps MIS use of the word "memorization. One was leaning towards "memorizing" "ANSWERS" purely to satisfy an exam....... i.e; ABCD.......... it isn't quite that simple. On the other hand, the other argument was in the "true" sense of the word - TO MEMORIZE (commit to memory for life). what it has been about is that couple of folks want to make out that somehow the NoCodeTechs are some how doing something altogether different from what has been done for years |
#282
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
t... jawod wrote: If MENSA membership is important to you, fine. Most of us find it a bit pretentious and downright silly. Ditto for the Morse code testing requirement. That was the whole point. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Let me set something straight. "I" was NOT beating my chest about "CODE". I was only in the argument with regard to the use/misuse of the word "Memorization". "I" think code has its place - but not as it once did. It sure isn't keeping the bands clean by keeping it in place. "I" don't use code - that often. I think also, it "can" be fun to learn for those who may want to try it. Some people may - as has been proven, still - others won't - which also has been proven. THAT IS MY stance on code. As to the "mis"spelling of "genius", hey - what can I say - I'm human, I DO make mistakes. I don't rely on "spell check" techniques - so ............ an error does tend to sneak through from time to time. It doesn't matter one iota to me if you do code or not. "I" surely am not here to pass judgement on you or anyone else by that ability or inability (since some DO have trouble getting it). OR lack of interest "may" be more specific. I have quite a few people I talk to on the bands who are "NO CODE Techs. They're not interested in the code - OR wanting to climb any higher in license class. Its cool with me....... That is their thing - not mine. It sure doesn't mean we can't have a decent conversation - be it on the air via repeater, simplex, computer mode or face to face. L. |
#283
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
L. wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message t... jawod wrote: If MENSA membership is important to you, fine. Most of us find it a bit pretentious and downright silly. Ditto for the Morse code testing requirement. That was the whole point. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp Let me set something straight. "I" was NOT beating my chest about "CODE you are however enging a deabte flaming people on side of the map that tend to get you "counter battery fire sir face it or not as you choose |
#284
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?
a MENSA
level IQ is worth magnitudes more to its possessor than is Morse code skill even within the Amateur Radio Service. If all the coded hams with IQ's less than 100 were transformed into nocode techs with MENSA level IQ's, the ARS would be much better off and a lot less prone to silliness. The ARRL might even stop publishing those gross technical errors, e.g. reflections don't exist. Cecil you're trolling, aren't you? If you truly believe this stuff, you're in sadder shape than I thought. Your MENSA membership is dreck, dribble, dross. With code, there is, at least, some grounding in practicality: a real world function. "Whew! I knew I was a genius but now I have PROOF!" How completely sad. MENSA has perverted the very nature of IQ in a manner not dissimilar to the way Home Owner Associations have perverted the notion of individual freedoms (guaranteed by our Constitution). Enjoy your little trophy but I'm sure you'll keep yourself insulated from the derision you richly deserve when you bring it up in this newsgroup. I can tell that you're not a bad guy...but, the mensa thing makes you seem, I don't know, ...(fill in the blank) Be Good. Hell, be more egalitarian for once in your life! We all share a HOBBY!!!! John AB8O |
#285
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On 12 Aug 2006 15:42:50 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote: oncce you accpet that much of the testing involves memizztion the question then comes down to where is your beef? Those who memorize answers instead of learning concepts - what you would have seen at the beginning of the thread had you paid attention. you tread awfully close to libel there AL Look up the definition of "libel". Part of it is "malicious defamation". Calling a penny a cent isn't malicious, nor is it defamatory. ask an lawyer if you don't believe me You need to take your own advice. Also you need to ask an English teacher - you don't seem to know the definitions of a lot of very common words. |
#286
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On 12 Aug 2006 15:43:51 -0700, "an old friend"
wrote: Al Klein wrote: On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 14:41:33 GMT, Cecil Moore wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: There's a difference between memorizing a formula or method and memorizing specific answers to specific questions. The former is called learning, and can be applied to many situations. The latter is called laziness, and teaches nothing that can be used for any other purpose. That is just hair-splitting. The same hair splitting as the difference between stealing money and earning it - they're both methods of obtaining it. again you tread close to libel and flatout insaity There's nothing either malicious not defamatory in that. ("Who" am I defaming? "Hair"?) But, since you don't know the difference between "learning" and "memorizing", nor which subjects fall into which category, you probably can't see the parallel. and again Telling you something true about yourself isn't actionable, unless done with certain intent, which you'd be hard-pressed to prove. |
#287
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
#288
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:10:00 -0400, wrote:
On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 18:09:02 -0400, Al Klein wrote: Why don't you stay out of discussions you don't understand? We know you're a fool, why keep proving it? Read Samuel Clemens, at least. why don't you stay out of discussions that show so as aold fool not honest enough he blowing smoke Parroting what I say doesn't make you look educated. you are arguing over a difference that does not exist certain not as a some sharp line In your mind. http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ The fact that you posted something on your blog doesn't make it definitive, or even correct. |
#289
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
#290
|
|||
|
|||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue | Shortwave |