Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old July 13th 06, 11:21 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 487
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

clfe wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
It was before the Titanic hit the iceberg that the Titanic
CW operator told the Californian CW operator to get off the
air. He considered his normal Titanic CW message traffic to
have priority over any CW traffic that the Californian might
need to pass. Turns out the Californian's CW operator was
the only person in the world who could have saved the life
of the Titanic's CW operator.
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


In that case then - I stand corrected, I was unaware of that.


It's totaly untrue. The Californian's radio operator ignored the
Titanic's distress signals because the Titanic was a Marconi ship and
the Californian was a Telefunken ship. The operators were not allowed to
communicate with the competing company's operators under any
circumstances under penalty of being put off the ship at first landing,
with no hope of getting home or being hired by the other company.

I recently blogged about it:

http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/2006/06/22/

Geoff.

--
Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel N3OWJ/4X1GM
IL Voice: (07)-7424-1667 IL Fax: 972-2-648-1443 U.S. Voice: 1-215-821-1838
Visit my 'blog at
http://geoffstechno.livejournal.com/
  #32   Report Post  
Old July 13th 06, 11:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

Cecil Moore wrote in
om:

Dave wrote:
C'mon Cecil, you've been licensed as long as I have. I Know you Know
CW. Does that mean we're virtually obsolete?


My favorite mode is CW and it's a fun mode but it is never
going to save the world.



With an attitude like that it probably won't. Better keep a microphone
handy.

SC
  #33   Report Post  
Old July 13th 06, 11:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

Bill Turner wrote in
:

ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On 12 Jul 2006 10:24:55 -0700, "an old freind"
wrote:

if i was at my home station is no they would not die

and I am as no code as they come I down right hate the mode and yet y
pc and station is quite able to work cw as needed to save a life if it
was needed


------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

He apparently hates English too.

Bill, W6WRT



Imagine that coming toward you 20wpm. I'm begining to think it's good
he hates cw. LOL

SC
  #34   Report Post  
Old July 14th 06, 12:00 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?

Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
It's totaly untrue. The Californian's radio operator ignored the
Titanic's distress signals because the Titanic was a Marconi ship and
the Californian was a Telefunken ship.


If the History Channel got it right, the Californian's CW
operator was asleep by the time the Titanic hit the iceberg.
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp
  #35   Report Post  
Old July 14th 06, 12:01 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,614
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that persondie?

Slow Code wrote:
With an attitude like that it probably won't. Better keep a microphone
handy.


Actually, what I keep handy is food and water.
--
73, Cecil, http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp


  #36   Report Post  
Old July 14th 06, 02:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 36
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

Dirk wrote:

Ham's care more about operating appliances than knowing how to save a

lives.

:-(


troll-o-meter (digital version)
0*****1*****2*****3*****4*****5*****6*****7*****8* ****9*****
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

ah ****. we have a troll!
  #37   Report Post  
Old July 14th 06, 03:15 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 997
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 23:00:20 GMT, Cecil Moore
wrote:

If the History Channel got it right


That would be an historic first.
  #38   Report Post  
Old July 15th 06, 03:15 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?


Dirk wrote:
Ham's care more about operating appliances than knowing how to save a lives.

:-(


Many ham are American Red Cross first aid and adult CPR instructors.

That trumps CW at any speed.

  #39   Report Post  
Old July 15th 06, 03:17 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,554
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?


Steve N. wrote:
Uh oh! Now a battle of the troll-o-meters...
Really cute, Bill...I love it.

73, Steve, K9DCI
P.S. I tilted my monitor and I see that this movement is a little out of
balance on the sides. End-to-end balance is ok. Carefully turn the balance
weight on the right side in a little, then it'll sit on zero regardless of
the orientation...


Press the degauss button. The needle will let go.

"R. Scott" wrote in message
...
------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
TROLL-O-METER


Bill, W6WRT


There I fixed it for you



  #40   Report Post  
Old July 15th 06, 03:40 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.scanner,rec.radio.swap
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,590
Default If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die?


wrote:
Dirk wrote:
Ham's care more about operating appliances than knowing how to save a lives.

:-(


Many ham are American Red Cross first aid and adult CPR instructors.

That trumps CW at any speed.

lol thank you for that

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bonafied Proof of LIFE AFTER DEATH -- Coal Mine Rescue Ed Conrad Shortwave 0 July 6th 03 12:33 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017