Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"art" quoting RF:
All you need to do then is to prove it, and get the FCC to accept it. RF What about the use of complex circuitry methods od design does that present any advantage? We now can insert lumped constants ? ___________ Note the responsible party in this, which I re-post below with emphasis: "All __YOU__ need to do then is to prove it,..." If YOU, Art Unwin, want to be recogniz(s)ed for introducing a new application or concept about "Irregular Gaussian Radiation Fields," shouldn't that first be based upon your own theoretical and experimental research and proofs, which after your publication of same, are capable of being proven true by other scientific investigators? If both of those situations exist, then maybe you will have a chance for the commercial and governmental acceptance/success of your concepts, and your personal recognition for the same. But until then, you may wish to keep such revelations closer to your vest. With respect to your claimed English background, I wish you the best, Sir, and remain your humble and obedient servant etc, etc, RF |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian law and time varying fields | Antenna | |||
electric & magnetic fields ?? | Antenna | |||
Electric and Magnetic fields | Antenna | |||
On address fields in AX.25 packets | Digital | |||
On address fields in AX.25 packets | Digital |