Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote:
... I'd say there were two possibilities the 1) It ain't happened yet--so it never will. 2) It ain't happened yet--because we don't yet know enough. Frankly, I think those coming up with new ideas will subscribe to the second ... I do know that manganese dioxide can act as a catalyst in different situations as to seem "magical." (i.e. over come bonds at lower energy levels.) Regards, JS |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith I wrote:
2) It ain't happened yet--because we don't yet know enough. Frankly, I think those coming up with new ideas will subscribe to the second ... We know that e = mc^2 All we need is a method for conversion of ordinary mass into energy. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
... We know that e = mc^2 All we need is a method for conversion of ordinary mass into energy. Cecil: Absolutely! However, I am much more interested in converting energy to matter. Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight into gold! NO, I am NOT talking about gardening marijuana. grin Regards, JS |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Smith I wrote:
Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight into gold! m = e/c^2 That would take a heck of a lot of sunlight. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
John Smith I wrote: Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight into gold! m = e/c^2 That would take a heck of a lot of sunlight. Cecil: OK. I suspect you correct. I'll consider the marijuana. ;-) Regards, JS |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1 Jun, 11:51, John Smith I wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: ... We know that e = mc^2 All we need is a method for conversion of ordinary mass into energy. Cecil: Absolutely! However, I am much more interested in converting energy to matter. Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight into gold! NO, I am NOT talking about gardening marijuana. grin Regards, JS John DO do you think that Americans are not interested in experimenting any more because if anything new comes about that is usefull we can hire the engineers from India who have already done the research? Actually it seems that it has gone beyond that when you see the outcry against the Gaussian antenna or even boiling water. Do Americans really believe really believe that all is known and it is a waste of time to experiment? That if you are educated under the American system you have the ability to determine before hand what will work and what will not work? As an immigrant I was asked by the media the other day do I believe that immigrants that do the work that Americans wont do have a different aproach to life? I pointed him to read this newsgroup and make up his own mind , but I also did tell him to look up history to see how past Empires were lost, but I am not sure that he got my point Art |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
art wrote:
... Art: Well, your point is well taken here. Correct. They want the news media to filter all for them, thus relieving them of exercising mental muscle for themselves. They rely on denying anything new is coming along until it already is developed and accepted; then they claim they knew it all along. You'd think them embarrassed over the above; but then, you'd be mistaken. However, the gaussian antenna escapes me ... at least for the present time. But, I don't want the news to filter you! GRIN Regards, JS |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "art" wrote in message oups.com... On 1 Jun, 11:51, John Smith I wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: ... We know that e = mc^2 All we need is a method for conversion of ordinary mass into energy. Cecil: Absolutely! However, I am much more interested in converting energy to matter. Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight into gold! NO, I am NOT talking about gardening marijuana. grin Regards, JS John DO do you think that Americans are not interested in experimenting any more because if anything new comes about that is usefull we can hire the engineers from India who have already done the research? Actually it seems that it has gone beyond that when you see the outcry against the Gaussian antenna or even boiling water. Do Americans really believe really believe that all is known and it is a waste of time to experiment? That if you are educated under the American system you have the ability to determine before hand what will work and what will not work? As an immigrant I was asked by the media the other day do I believe that immigrants that do the work that Americans wont do have a different aproach to life? I pointed him to read this newsgroup and make up his own mind , but I also did tell him to look up history to see how past Empires were lost, but I am not sure that he got my point Art and just how do you know who on this group was educated where?? maybe those of us educated under the 'American' system have enough common sense to recognize snake oil when we see it?? A question for you... when was the last time you saw some really new invention that wasn't eventually proven to be fraud or bad science announced first on a usenet news group??? or on a tv news show??? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
... and just how do you know who on this group was educated where?? maybe those of us educated under the 'American' system have enough common sense to recognize snake oil when we see it?? A question for you... when was the last time you saw some really new invention that wasn't eventually proven to be fraud or bad science announced first on a usenet news group??? or on a tv news show??? Did you use that same argument when quantum physics was first being discussed? If not, how did you know that "insane phenomenon" was real? Although we have already developed experimental quantum computers and we can exploit the phenomenon, we do not understand the underlying physics to any real degree ... JS |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 1 Jun, 13:25, John Smith I wrote:
Dave wrote: ... and just how do you know who on this group was educated where?? maybe those of us educated under the 'American' system have enough common sense to recognize snake oil when we see it?? A question for you... when was the last time you saw some really new invention that wasn't eventually proven to be fraud or bad science announced first on a usenet news group??? or on a tv news show??? Did you use that same argument when quantum physics was first being discussed? If not, how did you know that "insane phenomenon" was real? Although we have already developed experimental quantum computers and we can exploit the phenomenon, we do not understand the underlying physics to any real degree ... JS Hold on now John. He was one of the first to find out that american mathematics was given incorrect answers. He pointed that out when that MIT doctor gave the mathematics to prove that adding the unit of time to both sides of the equation ( Gaussian statics law) changed a conservative field to a non conservative field with respect to radiation. On top of that most of the experts on the net agree with him. To point out that american mathematics does not support those of Gauss and Maxwell is indeed a major achievement and has gained him mass support from the resident experts. All resist the idea that equilibrium exists. Art |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR | Equipment | |||
WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! | CB |