Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 06:36 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Water burns!

Roy Lewallen wrote:

...


I'd say there were two possibilities the

1) It ain't happened yet--so it never will.

2) It ain't happened yet--because we don't yet know enough.

Frankly, I think those coming up with new ideas will subscribe to the
second ...

I do know that manganese dioxide can act as a catalyst in different
situations as to seem "magical." (i.e. over come bonds at lower energy
levels.)

Regards,
JS
  #2   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 07:33 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Water burns!

John Smith I wrote:
2) It ain't happened yet--because we don't yet know enough.

Frankly, I think those coming up with new ideas will subscribe to the
second ...


We know that e = mc^2 All we need is a method
for conversion of ordinary mass into energy.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #3   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 07:51 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Water burns!

Cecil Moore wrote:

...
We know that e = mc^2 All we need is a method
for conversion of ordinary mass into energy.


Cecil:

Absolutely!

However, I am much more interested in converting energy to matter.

Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight
into gold!

NO, I am NOT talking about gardening marijuana. grin

Regards,
JS
  #4   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 08:14 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,521
Default Water burns!

John Smith I wrote:
Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight
into gold!


m = e/c^2 That would take a heck of a lot of sunlight.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
  #5   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 08:20 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Water burns!

Cecil Moore wrote:
John Smith I wrote:
Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight
into gold!


m = e/c^2 That would take a heck of a lot of sunlight.


Cecil:

OK. I suspect you correct.

I'll consider the marijuana. ;-)

Regards,
JS


  #6   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 08:22 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Water burns!

On 1 Jun, 11:51, John Smith I wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

...


We know that e = mc^2 All we need is a method
for conversion of ordinary mass into energy.


Cecil:

Absolutely!

However, I am much more interested in converting energy to matter.

Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight
into gold!

NO, I am NOT talking about gardening marijuana. grin

Regards,
JS


John
DO do you think that Americans are not interested in experimenting any
more because
if anything new comes about that is usefull we can hire the engineers
from India
who have already done the research? Actually it seems that it has gone
beyond that
when you see the outcry against the Gaussian antenna or even boiling
water.
Do Americans really believe really believe that all is known and it is
a waste of time
to experiment? That if you are educated under the American system you
have the
ability to determine before hand what will work and what will not
work?
As an immigrant I was asked by the media the other day do I believe
that immigrants
that do the work that Americans wont do have a different aproach to
life?
I pointed him to read this newsgroup and make up his own mind , but I
also did tell
him to look up history to see how past Empires were lost, but I am not
sure
that he got my point
Art

  #7   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 08:32 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Water burns!

art wrote:

...


Art:

Well, your point is well taken here.

Correct. They want the news media to filter all for them, thus
relieving them of exercising mental muscle for themselves.

They rely on denying anything new is coming along until it already is
developed and accepted; then they claim they knew it all along.

You'd think them embarrassed over the above; but then, you'd be mistaken.

However, the gaussian antenna escapes me ... at least for the present
time. But, I don't want the news to filter you! GRIN

Regards,
JS
  #8   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 09:15 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 797
Default Water burns!


"art" wrote in message
oups.com...
On 1 Jun, 11:51, John Smith I wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:

...


We know that e = mc^2 All we need is a method
for conversion of ordinary mass into energy.


Cecil:

Absolutely!

However, I am much more interested in converting energy to matter.

Be nice to have a little machine in the backyard converting sunlight
into gold!

NO, I am NOT talking about gardening marijuana. grin

Regards,
JS


John
DO do you think that Americans are not interested in experimenting any
more because
if anything new comes about that is usefull we can hire the engineers
from India
who have already done the research? Actually it seems that it has gone
beyond that
when you see the outcry against the Gaussian antenna or even boiling
water.
Do Americans really believe really believe that all is known and it is
a waste of time
to experiment? That if you are educated under the American system you
have the
ability to determine before hand what will work and what will not
work?
As an immigrant I was asked by the media the other day do I believe
that immigrants
that do the work that Americans wont do have a different aproach to
life?
I pointed him to read this newsgroup and make up his own mind , but I
also did tell
him to look up history to see how past Empires were lost, but I am not
sure
that he got my point
Art


and just how do you know who on this group was educated where??

maybe those of us educated under the 'American' system have enough common
sense to recognize snake oil when we see it??

A question for you... when was the last time you saw some really new
invention that wasn't eventually proven to be fraud or bad science announced
first on a usenet news group??? or on a tv news show???



  #9   Report Post  
Old June 1st 07, 09:25 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,154
Default Water burns!

Dave wrote:

...
and just how do you know who on this group was educated where??

maybe those of us educated under the 'American' system have enough common
sense to recognize snake oil when we see it??

A question for you... when was the last time you saw some really new
invention that wasn't eventually proven to be fraud or bad science announced
first on a usenet news group??? or on a tv news show???



Did you use that same argument when quantum physics was first being
discussed?

If not, how did you know that "insane phenomenon" was real?

Although we have already developed experimental quantum computers and we
can exploit the phenomenon, we do not understand the underlying physics
to any real degree ...

JS

  #10   Report Post  
Old June 2nd 07, 12:51 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Water burns!

On 1 Jun, 13:25, John Smith I wrote:
Dave wrote:

...


and just how do you know who on this group was educated where??


maybe those of us educated under the 'American' system have enough common
sense to recognize snake oil when we see it??


A question for you... when was the last time you saw some really new
invention that wasn't eventually proven to be fraud or bad science announced
first on a usenet news group??? or on a tv news show???


Did you use that same argument when quantum physics was first being
discussed?

If not, how did you know that "insane phenomenon" was real?

Although we have already developed experimental quantum computers and we
can exploit the phenomenon, we do not understand the underlying physics
to any real degree ...

JS


Hold on now John. He was one of the first to find out that american
mathematics
was given incorrect answers. He pointed that out when that MIT doctor
gave the mathematics to prove that adding the unit of time to both
sides
of the equation ( Gaussian statics law) changed a conservative field
to a non conservative field with respect to radiation.
On top of that most of the experts on the net agree with him.
To point out that american mathematics does not support
those of Gauss and Maxwell is indeed a major achievement and has
gained him mass support from the resident experts. All resist the idea
that
equilibrium exists.
Art



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR RLucch2098 Equipment 0 April 10th 04 03:02 PM
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR RLucch2098 Equipment 0 April 10th 04 03:02 PM
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR RLucch2098 Equipment 0 April 6th 04 04:57 PM
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR RLucch2098 Equipment 0 April 6th 04 04:57 PM
WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! Twistedhed CB 1 August 23rd 03 02:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017