Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old June 5th 07, 01:39 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2007
Posts: 287
Default Water burns!


"Denny" wrote in message
ups.com...
I would be very much encouraged if
just one person acknoweledged the Gaussian aproach but sadly
this newsgroup is for arguments and ridicule.
Art



I have not critiqued in any post I have made, your Gaussian approach -
not that I expect you have a grid on the wall and are keeping score -
your method of combining Gauss, time, and classic EMF theory is beyond
my mathematical abilities... Where is Dick Feynman when you need
him...

Guass and time were already combined many years ago by Maxwell/ Heavyside.
If Art is saying they were wrong he hasnt said how. I havent seen any math
from
Art showing how he related time to Guass's theory, How it is different from
the established relationship
and how he can justify using NEC software which uses the established
relationships(not gassian}to verify the operation of his antennas.
Art needs to give us reason to see what he sees and he hasnt.

Jimmie


  #2   Report Post  
Old June 5th 07, 04:58 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
art art is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,188
Default Water burns!

On 5 Jun, 05:39, "Jimmie D" wrote:
"Denny" wrote in message

ups.com...I would be very much encouraged if
just one person acknoweledged the Gaussian aproach but sadly
this newsgroup is for arguments and ridicule.
Art


snip...



Guass and time were already combined many years ago by Maxwell/ Heavyside.
If Art is saying they were wrong he hasnt said how.


As you say........ "IF".........
Art has not said that.




I havent seen any math
from
Art showing how he related time to Guass's theory, How it is different from
the established relationship
and how he can justify using NEC software which uses the established
relationships(not gassian}to verify the operation of his antennas.
Art needs to give us reason to see what he sees and he hasnt.

Jimmie



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR RLucch2098 Equipment 0 April 10th 04 03:02 PM
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR RLucch2098 Equipment 0 April 10th 04 03:02 PM
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR RLucch2098 Equipment 0 April 6th 04 04:57 PM
FA: "RADIO, A STUDY OF FIRST PRINCIPLES" 1928 E.E.BURNS-NR RLucch2098 Equipment 0 April 6th 04 04:57 PM
WA3MOJ crahses and Burns!!! Twistedhed CB 1 August 23rd 03 02:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017