Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 15, 2:10 pm, "Nick" wrote:
I was under the impression that a 1/4 wave was approx 0 dBd, a 5/8ths was approx 3dBd, and a collinear dual 5/8ths was approaching 6dBd Nick Most the textbooks rate the 1/4 wave GP at .3 dbi. The 1/2 wave at 2.1 dbi or 0 dbd. The 5/8 GP appx 3.3 dbi, or 1.2 dbd. The dual 5/8 collinear appx 5.1 dbi or 3 dbd. But.... If you model the antennas, the sloping radial 1/4 GP actually does a bit better.. Appx 1.8 dbi, which is within .3 db of the 2.1 dbi you would see from a 1/2 wave. BTW, these are "free space" numbers. I don't like to confuse people by adding ground effects... Besides, if you do model over ground, you will see the same comparison spread.. It doesn't really change anything.. The gain from a 5/8 GP can be all over the map depending on the radial length used.. Most 5/8's use 1/4 wave radials. No bueno. At an old page I put up, you can see the effect of radial length on the performance of the 5/8 GP. http://web.wt.net/~nm5k/acompari.htm Many people rag on the 5/8 antenna, but the largest problem is due to an old lousy obsolete design which uses the short 1/4 wave radials. If you use longer radials, such as 5/8 or 3/4 you will see the rated gain you would expect from a 5/8 GP. If you use 1/4 wave radials, you can often see less gain at the desired angles than either the 1/2 wave, or 1/4 GP. Of course, all these examples assume no common mode currents on the feedline.. On VHF/UHF, decoupling of the feedline can be as important as the antenna design itself. So if I were to build say a dual 5/8 collinear, or a 5/8 GP with steep 5/8 radials, I would add a decoupling section below the lower element. IE: like an isopole, or whatever.. It used a lower 1/4 wave cone as the decoupling device. You could also add a section of 1/4 wave radials for decoupling.. 6dbd from a dual element vertical? Good luck..A 3 el NBS yagi is only good for about 7.3 dbd, and it will thrash a dual 5/8 collinear. If the height is limited, I would use the highest gain antenna I could scrape up. Even if you have obstructions, it's going to do a heck of a lot better than most any vertical at the same height. MK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What's It Worth? | Shortwave | |||
Really low SWRs but is it worth trimming the antenna | Antenna | |||
dual cb antenna is it worth the trouble | Antenna | |||
Worth-More 600 SS Amp | Equipment | |||
FS: Worth-More 600 SS | General |