Owen Duffy wrote:
(Geoffrey S. Mendelson) wrote in
:

...
At worst some neighbor would get ****ed off that you are messing up
their Internet and start a FUD campaign to force you off the air for
"dangerous radiation".

Interesting that you mention that.

Some of our good friends in Tasmania started a FUD campaign to scare
ordinary electricity consumers about the electromagnetic raidation hazard
of electric blankets when they were BPL 'enhanced'.

Good grief. The answer is to power them with DC, and tell 'em that it
will serve as a magnet, thereby allowing magnetism's great healing
properties. Could sell little boxes with diodes in them. Maybe a crystal
or two for harmonic hegemony and celestial peace too.... ;^)


There is some steady, sound engineering / scientific work going on to
discover and reveal the impact of BPL, it is small in scale but IMHO
credible and ongoing. Uninformed and redneck comment from the amateur
community makes the job just that much harder.

I find much of the commentary very uninformed. Much of this has to do
with the Digital folks not understanding the RF folks, and vice versa.
Especially alarming is the digital folks not understanding that a high
speed digital signal is for all intents and purposes an RF signal. It
isn't 1's and 0's any more, it is an RF signal until it gets into the
computer.


Of course, the RF savants have a hard time understanding things like
"Whaatya mean Vista dropped my IP address, and the only cure is to
reboot. It's been working for three days now - it just couldn't suddenly
quit. Electronics doesn't work like that!"

At that point, I offer them the choice of being right, or getting
things working.

- 73 de Mike KB3EIA -

Michael Coslo writes:

Owen Duffy wrote:
Good grief. The answer is to power them with DC, and tell 'em
that it will serve as a magnet, thereby allowing magnetism's great
healing properties. Could sell little boxes with diodes in them. Maybe
a crystal or two for harmonic hegemony and celestial peace too.... ;^)

And do remember that a ham antanna doesn't 'radiate'. It 'emanates
energies'.

73
LA4RT Jon

Jon ?Q?K=C3=A5re?= Hellan wrote in
:

Michael Coslo writes:

Owen Duffy wrote:
Good grief. The answer is to power them with DC, and tell 'em
that it will serve as a magnet, thereby allowing magnetism's great
healing properties. Could sell little boxes with diodes in them. Maybe
a crystal or two for harmonic hegemony and celestial peace too.... ;^)

And do remember that a ham antanna doesn't 'radiate'. It 'emanates
energies'.

73
LA4RT Jon

LA4RT Jon,

I wrote no such thing, you have misquoted, you are a fraud.

Owen

Owen Duffy writes:

Jon ?Q?K=C3=A5re?= Hellan wrote in
:

Michael Coslo writes:

Owen Duffy wrote:
Good grief. The answer is to power them with DC, and tell 'em
that it will serve as a magnet, thereby allowing magnetism's great
healing properties. Could sell little boxes with diodes in them. Maybe
a crystal or two for harmonic hegemony and celestial peace too.... ;^)

And do remember that a ham antanna doesn't 'radiate'. It 'emanates
energies'.

73
LA4RT Jon

LA4RT Jon,

I wrote no such thing, you have misquoted, you are a fraud.

Owen

Sorry. I didn't notice that I cut everything you wrote, but left your
name in.

Jon

Jon ?Q?K=C3=A5re?= Hellan wrote in
:

Sorry. I didn't notice that I cut everything you wrote, but left your
name in.

Apolgy accepted.

Please be carefull putting silly words into the mouths of others. If I
appear to have overreacted, it is because it would well suit the BPL box
movers to damage my credibility.

Owen

Owen Duffy wrote:
wrote:
Sorry. I didn't notice that I cut everything you wrote, but left your
name in.

Apolgy accepted.

Actually, with nested well-behaved newsreader
software doing the attributions, one doesn't
have to worry at all about such.

If one sees:

w5dxp wrote:

Owen Duffy wrote:
I admit that I am an asshole.

it can actually be attributed to w5dxp.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Cecil Moore wrote in news:NHJyi.698$YQ.462
@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com:

Owen Duffy wrote:
wrote:
Sorry. I didn't notice that I cut everything you wrote, but left your
name in.

Apolgy accepted.

Actually, with nested well-behaved newsreader
software doing the attributions, one doesn't
have to worry at all about such.

If one sees:

w5dxp wrote:

Owen Duffy wrote:
I admit that I am an asshole.

it can actually be attributed to w5dxp.

Cecil, for all your claimed IQ, you are just offensive... Owen

Cecil Moore writes:

Actually, with nested well-behaved newsreader
software doing the attributions, one doesn't
have to worry at all about such.

If I hadn't removed what Owen said, there wouldn't have been a
problem. But I accidentally left "Owen said", but not *what* Owen
said. Hence the confusion.

73
LA4RT Jon

Jon Kåre Hellan wrote:

And do remember that a ham antanna doesn't 'radiate'. It 'emanates
energies'.

73
LA4RT Jon

Yes, absolutely. And hopefully it is a device from which positive
vibrational energies might emanate. (unlike some computer keyboards) :-)

73, ac6xg