Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Aug, 15:31, John Smith wrote:
art wrote: ... only the evidence that has been chosen for the moment at least until the printer of science books get back to work again. Ofcourse some say if it is in a book then that is what is correct, just like on the web! ... Art Art: When we make this final leap, explain that one-more-thing which will trigger that flood of understanding, that revelation, that epiphany--we will only look back and marvel that it took us so long--that we were so close, for so long ... An example is the atomic bomb. We always knew that if you pile up a lot of pure radioactive material--you get heat--we speculated with a great belief that an explosion from this process was possible. But putting it all together, getting the right isotope with the extra atomic particles available and a system to SLAM! enough of the material together (~2.2Kg) and an "exploding bottle" of force to surround it and keep it together so it didn't just melt/vaporize/weak-poof but would burst out in a healthy explosion, until then, we hadn't really discovered the atomic bomb ... We stand such a threshold now, this "silence of new discovery" only leads before the "storm of revelation(s)", that very next step may take us there ... or, so I hope. Somewhere out there is the mind(s) which will accomplish it. We simply need to continue the discussion and search--keep the candle in the window. Simply put, we need an Einstein and a Manhattan Project. Or, perhaps we only just need a bunch more high IQ "kooks" in their basements with wires and reactances--thinking and building from their imaginations. Regards, JS Yup..And after that person dies and only after he dies will people examine what he found and depending on the favorable publicity of the time will they consider its validity. To acknowledge its validity while the man is still alive means acceptance that the man is the smartest of all a tribute that no man is willing to assign. For instance, if I stated that I had a dipole for 160 meters that was rotatable only snarls and laughter would be heard since it is NOT something that one WANTS to believe, because, if it was really possible he himself would have made it. Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Midland UHF NMO 5/8 over 1/2 wave Mobile Antennas | Swap | |||
FA: Midland UHF NMO 5/8 over 1/2 wave Mobile Antennas | Swap | |||
FA: Midland UHF NMO 5/8 over 1/2 wave Mobile Antennas | Equipment | |||
7/8 wave antennas? | Homebrew | |||
Loop Antennas, Medium Wave - 120m Band | Antenna |