Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Help me buy VHF/UHF television antenna? Can't decide!
"JB" wrote:
That is a complication but not if your antenna can just see across the roof of the other building, then it can actually help. If the main signal source is reduced, reflections will be more pronounced. The problem with digital, all you have is a bar graph. Reception problems are totally masked. The reception problems that degrade Analog still degrade Digital, you just can't see it. I have seen situations where there is lots of signal on the bar graph, but the picture still breaks up because of distortion of the signal. So while Analog is still there, get your antenna aligned and locked down and hope no one builds another building. Well you have sure opened my eyes up to the importance of a DIRECTIONAL antenna when it comes to DTV!! I'm lucky in that all stations locally are broadcast from same towers in same location..... so only one direction to worry abt. Again my zip is 63401 Seems like the more directional the antenna the better as it will be "blind" to multi-path. Yes? Sometiimes pointing the antenna at a tall building or mountain will give a better signal because all stations are bouncing from that building.. If you can stand on your roof with binocculars and see the broadcasting site, and there are no 12-100 story buildings or mountains around, put your antenna there and be done with it. Keep in mind that if you find yourself running 75 feet of coax, it would be like putting up an $80 antenna just to shorten the coax to 35 feet. Well I cant see the towers but they are there |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Help me buy VHF/UHF television antenna? Can't decide!
"JB" wrote:
While the 1080 UHF is fairly sharp with some potential gain, the VHF elements seem to be little more than "rabbit ears" - In fact it is a swept dipole, so will be bi-directional and easily pick up reflections from behind and around you.. I'm a bit confused on your remark above. Looks to me like the 1080 is perfectly flat antenna. Where do you see any bending or sweeping of elements? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Help me buy VHF/UHF television antenna? Can't decide!
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Help me buy VHF/UHF television antenna? Can't decide!
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Help me buy VHF/UHF television antenna? Can't decide!
I am looking at a 1080. It is being used in the computer room. All of the
elements are in two, parallel planes that are each normal to earth. In other words, flat. On high-VHF (channel 12, here) there is little F/B ratio, but that has not been a problem. The chances of needing to reject a high-VHF station (at 180 degrees) on the same frequency is slim. The antenna is a stout, little, two-bay broadside array with reflector mostly effective on UHF. I provided a detailed set of measurements in another message. 73, Mac N8TT -- J. McLaughlin; Michigan, USA Home: wrote in message news "JB" wrote: While the 1080 UHF is fairly sharp with some potential gain, the VHF elements seem to be little more than "rabbit ears" - In fact it is a swept dipole, so will be bi-directional and easily pick up reflections from behind and around you.. I'm a bit confused on your remark above. Looks to me like the 1080 is perfectly flat antenna. Where do you see any bending or sweeping of elements? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Help me buy VHF/UHF television antenna? Can't decide!
OOPS! I guess I got them backwards. I must be up past my bedtime.
wrote in message news "JB" wrote: While the 1080 UHF is fairly sharp with some potential gain, the VHF elements seem to be little more than "rabbit ears" - In fact it is a swept dipole, so will be bi-directional and easily pick up reflections from behind and around you.. I'm a bit confused on your remark above. Looks to me like the 1080 is perfectly flat antenna. Where do you see any bending or sweeping of elements? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Help me buy VHF/UHF television antenna? Can't decide!
Sorry about that. I did get them mixed up not having the photos in front of
me when writing. Roy is also correct. All that is in the ARRL Antenna Handbook. I believe impedance is lowered though at the dipole elements apex. to some extent. The dipole vs. Inverted V comes to mind, but the feedpoint impedance of a LPDA is really about the spacing of the feeders and matching system. . I'll shut up now "J. Mc Laughlin" wrote in message .. . I am looking at a 1080. It is being used in the computer room. All of the elements are in two, parallel planes that are each normal to earth. In other words, flat. On high-VHF (channel 12, here) there is little F/B ratio, but that has not been a problem. The chances of needing to reject a high-VHF station (at 180 degrees) on the same frequency is slim. The antenna is a stout, little, two-bay broadside array with reflector mostly effective on UHF. I provided a detailed set of measurements in another message. 73, Mac N8TT -- J. McLaughlin; Michigan, USA Home: wrote in message news "JB" wrote: While the 1080 UHF is fairly sharp with some potential gain, the VHF elements seem to be little more than "rabbit ears" - In fact it is a swept dipole, so will be bi-directional and easily pick up reflections from behind and around you.. I'm a bit confused on your remark above. Looks to me like the 1080 is perfectly flat antenna. Where do you see any bending or sweeping of elements? |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So, how do you decide where to buy your gear? | Equipment | |||
when will stevie decide to end this game? | Policy | |||
when will steve decide enough is enough | Policy | |||
Television Antenna | Antenna | |||
Need to replace a 40 year old television antenna wall jack - help! | General |