Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:18:49 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote: On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:49:46 +0800, who where wrote: But not one of them in Perth. No relation to anyone you are thinking_of/describing/etc, sorry to ruin your conspiracy theory. Your confirmation here doesn't ruin anything. Art would hug you no matter how you sign. Those he does have a remarkable need for retaining anonymity. He would have us believe it's because his supporters are easily bruised in the jostle. The following comment would support that: ...gives a rats about the consistency of the result would go down that path. which is another but perhaps left-handed confirmation. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Whatever - and whoever Art is. I wonder why people like you carry on at a personal level towards posters whose views you don't share. And you seem to need the limelight, posting a name and callsign. I'm describing how the matching IS done commercially. You can crap on forever if you wish about how you might do it. Fini. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Matching Coax Impedance: To Receiver or To Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Matching Coax Impedance: To Receiver or To Antenna ? | Antenna | |||
How much can the impedance of coax vary from its characteristic impedance? | Antenna | |||
.5-600 MHz LT5512 impedance matching | Homebrew | |||
impedance matching | General |