Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:55:19 -0600, tom wrote:
who where wrote: Whatever - and whoever Art is. I wonder why people like you carry on at a personal level towards posters whose views you don't share. And you seem to need the limelight, posting a name and callsign. I'm describing how the matching IS done commercially. You can crap on forever if you wish about how you might do it. Fini. The "ways it's done commercially" depends a lot on the desired result. A choked line into a 50 ohm DE is an easy to do but not optimal method. It doesn't give best gain or BW or best F/B or best noise temperature and never ever gives the best combination of them for weak signal work. But it IS easy. And it's not always what the commercial antenna builders use. It's what you have noticed that they sell. Or you might be pushing how much it's used just a bit. If you re-read what I posted, you will notice I stated "series coax transformer". An in-line impedance transforming section is totally different to simply stuffing RF choking on the line. It is the method the three major manufacturers here in Australia employ on their SMD's and the driven FD's on their yagis. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Matching Coax Impedance: To Receiver or To Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Matching Coax Impedance: To Receiver or To Antenna ? | Antenna | |||
How much can the impedance of coax vary from its characteristic impedance? | Antenna | |||
.5-600 MHz LT5512 impedance matching | Homebrew | |||
impedance matching | General |