Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 8th 09, 08:31 PM posted to alt.internet.wireless,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Matching impedance with coax

On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:25:01 -0600, "amdx" wrote:

I'll try to get a better picture of the feedpoint for you.
Is there a way to work the .66 wavelength of 50 ohm cable backwards ie.
What impedance would be transformed to 50 ohms with .66 wavelength of
50 ohm coax?
(this assumes the little knowledge I have about impedance transformation
using
coax is correct.)
Mike

Here's a link to a picture.

http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/p...MFJCollage.jpg
Mike


Hi Mike,

That is a pretty good rendering given the other pix. Have you any
experience with Smith Charts? Still, and all, you need to know the Z
of at least one point to transform to another.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 8th 09, 10:47 PM posted to alt.internet.wireless,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 349
Default Matching impedance with coax


"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 8 Nov 2009 11:25:01 -0600, "amdx" wrote:

I'll try to get a better picture of the feedpoint for you.
Is there a way to work the .66 wavelength of 50 ohm cable backwards
ie.
What impedance would be transformed to 50 ohms with .66 wavelength of
50 ohm coax?
(this assumes the little knowledge I have about impedance transformation
using
coax is correct.)
Mike

Here's a link to a picture.

http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/p...MFJCollage.jpg
Mike


Hi Mike,

That is a pretty good rendering given the other pix. Have you any
experience with Smith Charts? Still, and all, you need to know the Z
of at least one point to transform to another.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


They should have been better, those are pictures I took a couple of years
ago.
I didn't blowup someone elses pictures.
"you need to know the Z of at least one point to transform to another."
I would be happy with the assumption the the impedance at the N connector
is 50 ohms. But I think I have a misunderstanding because, in use you would
add more 50 ohm coax to run from the N connector to the transmiter. Soo,
that .66
wavelength section on the antenna becomes anything you add to it.
AT this point, I have to think the folded loop is forced down to 50 ohms by
it's
surrounding structures and there is no impedance transformation betwen the
loop
and the N connector.
Mike


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Matching Coax Impedance: To Receiver or To Antenna ? Robert11 Shortwave 7 March 5th 08 02:09 PM
Matching Coax Impedance: To Receiver or To Antenna ? Robert11 Antenna 4 March 4th 08 01:17 PM
How much can the impedance of coax vary from its characteristic impedance? [email protected] Antenna 23 August 21st 07 09:12 PM
.5-600 MHz LT5512 impedance matching [email protected] Homebrew 1 May 23rd 07 05:45 AM
impedance matching [email protected] General 3 April 10th 07 04:56 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017