Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its a dead loss. The WIA's guidelines on callsigns are not very clear.
If the callsign is available you should have the right to apply for it, just like when the ACMA administered the callsigns. These callsigns are clearly not allocated on the first come first serve basis, but on some other arbitrary set of rules that nobody knows. If you look at the history of the 2 letter callsigns allocated you see a clear preference towards clubs and its officials, one off individuals are low down in the preference ranks. The callsigns are not being administered in way thats fair to the broader amateur community. I now several people who have applied in consistent manner multiple time. One person actually lodged several applications within 1 hour of the callsigns been listed. He lives in the same post office zone and the applications were mailed with the same day. You can understand his skepticism. It would have been far better if the callsigns administration was in the hands of some independent body not related to ham radio. A simpler fairer impartial system would have to use a automated secure online immediate transaction system., just like they sell tickets. In the past it too 30 mins for the ACMA to allocate a call why the WIA takes weeks is beyond me. What i have experience so far, is that I have little faith in WIA allocating these 2 letter calls. I wonder if the process is open to legal independent scrutiny? Does the ACMA audit the process I wonder? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/23/2010 8:28 PM, Greg wrote:
Its a dead loss. The WIA's guidelines on callsigns are not very clear. SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP What i have experience so far, is that I have little faith in WIA allocating these 2 letter calls. I wonder if the process is open to legal independent scrutiny? Does the ACMA audit the process I wonder? Now that Art has gone missing (for now), we may have been delivered a replacement. tom K0TAR |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 24, 1:57*am, tom wrote:
On 4/23/2010 8:28 PM, Greg wrote: Its a dead loss. The WIA's guidelines on callsigns are not very clear. SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP SNIP What i have experience so far, is that I have little faith in WIA allocating these 2 letter calls. I wonder if the process is open to legal independent scrutiny? Does the ACMA audit the process I wonder? Now that Art has gone missing (for now), we may have been delivered a replacement. tom K0TAR he's just an aussie... must have figured he would try this group after the appropriate ones ignored him. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Greg" wrote in message ... Its a dead loss. The WIA's guidelines on callsigns are not very clear. If the callsign is available you should have the right to apply for it, just like when the ACMA administered the callsigns. These callsigns are clearly not allocated on the first come first serve basis, but on some other arbitrary set of rules that nobody knows. snip Or one could just take whatever callsign that was issued by the FCC, and live with it. --Wayne W5GIE...obviously that's what I did ![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think it compounded by the "CLUBS" that have one member and that these
are "collected" I think clubs should be happy with a 2x3 let "real" people who will be active and operate on regular basis have the choice calls. Just my two cents worth.... - jay W0VNE Greg wrote: Its a dead loss. The WIA's guidelines on callsigns are not very clear. If the callsign is available you should have the right to apply for it, just like when the ACMA administered the callsigns. These callsigns are clearly not allocated on the first come first serve basis, but on some other arbitrary set of rules that nobody knows. If you look at the history of the 2 letter callsigns allocated you see a clear preference towards clubs and its officials, one off individuals are low down in the preference ranks. The callsigns are not being administered in way thats fair to the broader amateur community. I now several people who have applied in consistent manner multiple time. One person actually lodged several applications within 1 hour of the callsigns been listed. He lives in the same post office zone and the applications were mailed with the same day. You can understand his skepticism. It would have been far better if the callsigns administration was in the hands of some independent body not related to ham radio. A simpler fairer impartial system would have to use a automated secure online immediate transaction system., just like they sell tickets. In the past it too 30 mins for the ACMA to allocate a call why the WIA takes weeks is beyond me. What i have experience so far, is that I have little faith in WIA allocating these 2 letter calls. I wonder if the process is open to legal independent scrutiny? Does the ACMA audit the process I wonder? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's all the fuss about? I've got mine! :-)
Irv VE6BP "Greg" wrote in message ... Its a dead loss. The WIA's guidelines on callsigns are not very clear. If the callsign is available you should have the right to apply for it, just like when the ACMA administered the callsigns. These callsigns are clearly not allocated on the first come first serve basis, but on some other arbitrary set of rules that nobody knows. If you look at the history of the 2 letter callsigns allocated you see a clear preference towards clubs and its officials, one off individuals are low down in the preference ranks. The callsigns are not being administered in way thats fair to the broader amateur community. I now several people who have applied in consistent manner multiple time. One person actually lodged several applications within 1 hour of the callsigns been listed. He lives in the same post office zone and the applications were mailed with the same day. You can understand his skepticism. It would have been far better if the callsigns administration was in the hands of some independent body not related to ham radio. A simpler fairer impartial system would have to use a automated secure online immediate transaction system., just like they sell tickets. In the past it too 30 mins for the ACMA to allocate a call why the WIA takes weeks is beyond me. What i have experience so far, is that I have little faith in WIA allocating these 2 letter calls. I wonder if the process is open to legal independent scrutiny? Does the ACMA audit the process I wonder? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|