![]() |
Recognition of the Aether presence or not
On 9/5/2010 8:08 PM, tom wrote:
On 9/5/2010 7:50 PM, K wrote: I wonder if ether and dark energy are related? K "John Smith" wrote in message ... On 9/5/2010 4:37 PM, tom wrote: ... We do: " "1925 - the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment produces a positive result while attempting to detect the effect of Earth's rotation on the velocity of light. The significance of the experiment remains debated to this day, but this planetary Sagnac effect is measured by ring laser gyros and taken into account by the GPS system." especially when it moves around planets with magnetic fields? why are light waves not affected by magnetic or electric fields?? They are. Faraday effect, electrooptic effect and so on. S* What a maroon. tom K0TAR In deep space, light should go 100% unimpeded by any magnetic fields. In an atmosphere, plasma, or other media, I would think light can be affected, fiber optics can even bend light using a physical force acting on the media carrying the light, instead of a magnetic field. In deep space, there is almost nothing but ether, and ether, the gravitational ether of Einstein, needs to be bent with gravity, and when the ether is bent, some distortion of the path of light should certainly be detected ... but that debated experiment, someone already mentioned, carries on. Regards, JS Ditto on maroon. tom K0TAR Due to top posting, I responded to the previous person. Sorry. I prefer top posting myself, but this group does not. tom K0TAR |
Recognition of the Aether presence or not
On 9/5/2010 6:19 PM, tom wrote:
Due to top posting, I responded to the previous person. Sorry. I prefer top posting myself, but this group does not. tom K0TAR Us maroons think you are missing something: http://www.dxzone.com/cgi-bin/dir/jump2.cgi?ID=12673 Is you license the highest degree you possess? ROFLOL Don't even worry about looking like a non-conforming idiot; That is the least of your problems. :-( Regards, JS |
Recognition of the Aether presence or not
On 9/5/2010 6:47 PM, John Smith wrote:
... Us maroons think you are missing something: http://www.dxzone.com/cgi-bin/dir/jump2.cgi?ID=12673 Is you license the highest degree you possess? ROFLOL Don't even worry about looking like a non-conforming idiot; That is the least of your problems. :-( Regards, JS Uh, this link, instead: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magneto-optic_effect And, I'll worry about looking like a URL-post bungling idiot! ROFLOL Regards, JS |
Recognition of the Aether presence or not
On 8/31/2010 3:54 PM, Cecil Moore wrote:
... Does God have DNA? If not, where did Jesus' Y DNA come from? If yes, can God be killed? -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com OK, Cecil, you asked the question, and we did not sleep until we had your answer. I believe this is an answer to that question: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGLPA...layer_embedded Sunday, September fifth, two-thousand and ten ... and you were there! Regards, JS |
Recognition of the Aether presence or not
On 9/5/2010 8:17 PM, John Smith wrote:
... OK, Cecil, you asked the question, and we did not sleep until we had your answer. I believe this is an answer to that question: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EGLPA...layer_embedded Sunday, September fifth, two-thousand and ten ... and you were there! Regards, JS AND!!! LORDY, LORDY, LORDY! There is MORE! (get it while it is hot! grin) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4TIpf...1&feature=fvwp Regards, JS |
Recognition of the Aether presence or not
"John Smith" wrote ... On 9/5/2010 4:37 PM, tom wrote: ... We do: " "1925 - the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment produces a positive result while attempting to detect the effect of Earth's rotation on the velocity of light. The significance of the experiment remains debated to this day, but this planetary Sagnac effect is measured by ring laser gyros and taken into account by the GPS system." especially when it moves around planets with magnetic fields? why are light waves not affected by magnetic or electric fields?? They are. Faraday effect, electrooptic effect and so on. In deep space, light should go 100% unimpeded by any magnetic fields. In an atmosphere, plasma, or other media, No deep space. Everywhere is the Interstellar Medium. There happens the interesting things with the light.: http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/l...kyway/ism.html I would think light can be affected, fiber optics can even bend light using a physical force acting on the media carrying the light, instead of a magnetic field. In deep space, there is almost nothing but ether, and ether, the gravitational ether of Einstein, needs to be bent with gravity, and when the ether is bent, some distortion of the path of light should certainly be detected ... but that debated experiment, someone already mentioned, carries on. In "deep space" are also stars so the electroms, ions, atoms and dust have the different temperatures and density. Speed of all waves are the temperature dependent. The refraction index also. S* |
Recognition of the Aether presence or not
On Sep 5, 5:16*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w ... On Sep 4, 6:06 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: "Cecil Moore" ... On Sep 3, 1:14 pm, John Smith wrote: Seriously, though, the real question is "Where did the ether come from?" Apparently, human intelligence and logic has not yet evolved to be able to handle such questions although Ayn Rand came close decades ago. Always were the two ethers. Normal for the normal electric waves and the "special" for the EM waves. The normal is that by Ludwig Lorenz and the second by H. Lorentz. The normal is the rare plazma (electrons, ions, atoms and dust). The special is in many forms. The normal is produced by the Sun. The special - I do not know. 'normally' when something has to be called 'special' it means that it doesn't represent the real world... not 'special' relativity is just a subset of 'general' relativity. *if the 'normal' is created by the sun and we now know that there is a discontinuity at the edge of the solar system where our solar wind is deflected by the galactic plasma... and indeed there are major discontinuities around the earth due to our magnetic field... why are there not distortions in the waves traveling in the plasma? All is like with the sound waves in the wind. if waves travel in water and the water is moving the waves move with the water, why can we not measure the difference in speed or direction of waves carried in the moving solar plasma, We do: " "1925 - the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment produces a positive result while attempting to detect the effect of Earth's rotation on the velocity of light. The significance of the experiment remains debated to this day, but this planetary Sagnac effect is measured by ring laser gyros and taken into account by the GPS system." of course, but this was not detecting aether movement, it was detecting acceleration from the rotation of the earth as predicted by special relativity. especially when it moves around planets with magnetic fields? *why are light waves not affected by magnetic or electric fields?? They are. Faraday effect, electrooptic effect and so on. S* those effect require a material that is sensitive to the field. it is not the fields themselves that are interacting it is the fields and the materials. |
Recognition of the Aether presence or not
On Sep 5, 7:50*pm, "K" wrote:
I wonder if ether and dark energy are related? Let's call it "quantum ether" to distinguish it from the earlier obsolete concepts. Yes, dark energy seems to make up ~70% of the universe which is mostly space so there is little doubt that quantum ether space is related to dark energy in some way. http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_matter.html -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Recognit... Dark Matter via Hubble & computer enhancement
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100824.html
On 9/6/2010 7:30 AM, Cecil Moore wrote: On Sep 5, 7:50 pm, wrote: I wonder if ether and dark energy are related? Let's call it "quantum ether" to distinguish it from the earlier obsolete concepts. Yes, dark energy seems to make up ~70% of the universe which is mostly space so there is little doubt that quantum ether space is related to dark energy in some way. http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_matter.html -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Recognition of the Aether presence or not
"K1TTT" wrote ... On Sep 5, 5:16 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: We do: " "1925 - the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment produces a positive result while attempting to detect the effect of Earth's rotation on the velocity of light. The significance of the experiment remains debated to this day, but this planetary Sagnac effect is measured by ring laser gyros and taken into account by the GPS system." of course, but this was not detecting aether movement, it was detecting acceleration from the rotation of the earth as predicted by special relativity. In 1905 Einstein wrote: "Examples of this sort, together with the unsuccessful attempts to discover any motion of the earth relatively to the ``light medium,'' suggest that the phenomena of electrodynamics as well as of mechanics possess no properties corresponding to the idea of absolute rest." In "1925 - the Michelson-Gale-Pearson experiment produces a positive result" (motion of the earth relatively to the ``light medium,'' ) As you see after 1925 all predictions of SR and EM are the tales used in schools to teach the math. S* |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com