![]() |
Sidebands
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Uzytkownik "Jeff" napisal w wiadomosci ... I am trying to find if that SSB from 1915 were the distance dependent. S* Distance from where? You are not making sense. From the station. S* The modulation used has nothing directly to do with the distance a signal is usefull. That is determined, at a given power and state of the the ionosphere, mostly by signal to noise ratio which is influenced by the bandwidth of the modulation method but not by the modulation method itself. Electomagnetic propagate works the same today as it did in 1915 or even 30,000 BC if anyone had been around with a radio. You are a babbling idiot. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Sidebands
On Dec 22, 12:59*pm, wrote:
What was in 1915? S* The battleship HMS Formidable is sunk off Lyme Regis, Dorset, England, by a German U-Boat. -- Jim Pennino Gallipoli landings. |
Sidebands
Uzytkownik "Richard Fry" napisal w wiadomosci ... I am trying to find if that SSB from 1915 were the distance dependent. S* Distance from where? You are not making sense. From the station. S* ________________ Radio waves behaved the same in 1915 as they do now. The distance to a given field intensity, for the same conditions, is the same now as it was then. Look at the damped waves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave The damped waves pulses are simillar to AM (amplitude of oscillation decreases/increases with time). The decreasing/increasing may be sharp or gently. The old damped waves " transmissions have a wide bandwidth". Was the bandwith the distance dependent? S* |
Sidebands
"Jeff" wrote ... Nope, you haven't the slightest bit of understanding of what the term "passband" means so your question is nonsense. "Radio receivers generally include a tunable band-pass filter with a passband that is wide enough to accommodate the bandwidth of the radio signal transmitted by a single station." That statement is at best misleading, and in some cases incorrect. In most receivers any *tunable* filter is MUCH MUCH wider than the bandwidth required to accommodate the bandwidth of the signal transmitted. The selectivity being produced by one or more *fixed* frequency filters which are just wide enough to accommodate the bandwidth of the wanted signal. For me a radio is a box with the knob to rotate. Now at FM no brakes between stations. At AM are. What was in 1915? S* In 1915 there were no broadcast stations to speak of so your dial would be just one large "brake" (sic). "Well, it's like this. The story starts in 1915, when mankind discovered sidebands. Now possessing this superior understanding of the AM signal, radio scientists began to understand the implications of their discovery. Soon afterwards, our old friends at Bell Labs, who have discovered practically everything, developed a method for removing one of the sidebands of an AM signal but retaining all the essential modulation components. As an expert of that day supposedly said, "both sidebands are saying the same thing" (Goodman, 1948). " From: http://www.hamradiomarket.com/articles/SSBHistory.htm If in 1915 were no broadcast stations to speak tell us what was with the first station to speak and when it start transmitting. S* |
Sidebands
For me a radio is a box with the knob to rotate. Now at FM no brakes between stations. At AM are. What was in 1915? S* In 1915 there were no broadcast stations to speak of so your dial would be just one large "brake" (sic). "Well, it's like this. The story starts in 1915, when mankind discovered sidebands. Now possessing this superior understanding of the AM signal, radio scientists began to understand the implications of their discovery. Soon afterwards, our old friends at Bell Labs, who have discovered practically everything, developed a method for removing one of the sidebands of an AM signal but retaining all the essential modulation components. As an expert of that day supposedly said, "both sidebands are saying the same thing" (Goodman, 1948). " From: http://www.hamradiomarket.com/articles/SSBHistory.htm If in 1915 were no broadcast stations to speak tell us what was with the first station to speak and when it start transmitting. S* The first AM Broadcast station (as opposed to amateur or military ) was in about 1919. Jeff |
Sidebands
Look at the damped waves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave The damped waves pulses are simillar to AM (amplitude of oscillation decreases/increases with time). The decreasing/increasing may be sharp or gently. The old damped waves " transmissions have a wide bandwidth". Was the bandwith the distance dependent? S* Damped waves bear little or no similarity to AM, they are essentially pulses with a very different spectral content. Being pulses the spectral content is wide, tending to infinite, and yes I suppose that the spectrum received by a distant station will vary depending on distance; the lower level spectral lines that are spaced a long way from the fundamental will be lost below the noise as you get further away or the signal gets weaker due to propagation changes. The more side-bands that you loose the slower will be the rise and fall time of the received pulse. AM is very different the spectrum is much more contained and only 1 side-band is required to replicate the waned signal. Jeff |
Sidebands
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
If in 1915 were no broadcast stations to speak tell us what was with the first station to speak and when it start transmitting. S* There were no broadcasting stations of any kind in 1915. The first station that could even remotely be called a broadcasting station was in 1916 and it broadcasted weather reports in morse code. The first experimental AM broadcast stations started in 1919 and regular AM broadcasting started in 1920 when all the spark gap morse transmitters were shut down. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Sidebands
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Look at the damped waves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave The damped waves pulses are simillar to AM (amplitude of oscillation decreases/increases with time). Only to someone who hasn't a clue what they are talking about. The decreasing/increasing may be sharp or gently. The old damped waves " transmissions have a wide bandwidth". Was the bandwith the distance dependent? S* Word salad gibberish. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Sidebands
On Dec 23, 1:56*am, Jeff wrote:
For me a radio is a box with the knob to rotate. Now at FM no brakes between stations. At AM are. What was in 1915? S* In 1915 there were no broadcast stations to speak of so your dial would be just one large "brake" (sic). "Well, it's like this. The story starts in 1915, when mankind discovered sidebands. Now possessing this superior understanding of the AM signal, radio scientists began to understand the implications of their discovery. Soon afterwards, our old friends at Bell Labs, who have discovered practically everything, developed a method for removing one of the sidebands of an AM signal but retaining all the essential modulation components. As an expert of that day supposedly said, "both sidebands are saying the same thing" (Goodman, 1948). " From: http://www.hamradiomarket.com/articles/SSBHistory.htm If in 1915 were no broadcast stations to speak tell us what was with the first station to speak and when it start transmitting. S* The first AM Broadcast station (as opposed to amateur or military ) was in about 1919. Jeff KCBS, San Francisco, claims to be the direct lineal descendant of Charles Herrold's broadcasting, which dates from 1910. However, Herrold's early work involved broadcasting to amateurs, by his own admission. http://www.charlesherrold.org/KCBS.html, et al. KCBS and KDKA, Pittsburgh, have been trading claims and counterclaims for decades. KDKA went on the air in November, 1920 and supporters of their claim of "First!" say KCBS doesn't date from the Herrold days, but rather from 1921, when they got their earliest commercial license, as KQW. I don't claim to be able to settle it here. Oy! "Sal" |
Sidebands
If in 1915 were no broadcast stations to speak tell us what was with the first station to speak and when it start transmitting. S* The first AM Broadcast station (as opposed to amateur or military ) was in about 1919. Jeff KCBS, San Francisco, claims to be the direct lineal descendant of Charles Herrold's broadcasting, which dates from 1910. However, Herrold's early work involved broadcasting to amateurs, by his own admission. http://www.charlesherrold.org/KCBS.html, et al. KCBS and KDKA, Pittsburgh, have been trading claims and counterclaims for decades. KDKA went on the air in November, 1920 and supporters of their claim of "First!" say KCBS doesn't date from the Herrold days, but rather from 1921, when they got their earliest commercial license, as KQW. I don't claim to be able to settle it here. Oy! "Sal" A year earlier PCGG in Holland started broadcasting on November 6, 1919 and is thought to be the first 'real' broadcast station. On 15th June 1920 Marconi made their first broadcast to the public from their works in Chelmsford, but it took until 1921 before there were regular programmes. Jeff |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:21 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com