Sidebands
 

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Here you a

Look at the damped waves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave

They are like the AM.

Only if it is modulation by a triangle wave and WAY over modulated, otherwise,
no, it is not.

Next look at Mr. Russell's animation:
http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/.../solitons.html

He wrote: "a.. The speed of the wave depends on the height of the wave."

So he is another babbling idiot.

The speed of the disturbance in media is the amplitude dependent - it is the
physics law.

Nope, not physics in this universe.

So I do not think.

First thing you've ever said that makes sense.

I am sure.

You left off the last part of the sentence: "a babbling idiot".

I only want you find out proper evidences. It should be interesting to you.
S*

"Interesting" is not a word I would use to describe your posts.

"Laughable", "deluded", and "babbling" come to mind.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Sidebands
 

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Yes. But EM waves are Heaviside's paper waves. In rality are Tesla's waves.
Do not be lazy and look for evidences.
S*

Babbling word salad meaning nothing.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Sidebands
 

On Dec 28, 8:18*pm, wrote:
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Yes. But EM waves are Heaviside's paper waves. In rality are Tesla's waves.
Do not be lazy and look for evidences.
S*

Babbling word salad meaning nothing.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

aww, don't be so hard on him. he is much more amusing if you feed him
a bit.

Sidebands
 

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Dec 28, 6:08 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

Yes. But EM waves are Heaviside's paper waves. In rality are Tesla's
waves.
Do not be lazy and look for evidences.
S*

There is no 'evidences' for that. Maxwell's equations describe EM
waves perfectly well, have been verified by experiments for over 100
years, and work fine for me.

Biot-Savart and Heaviside made the very simple model. So simple that it was
choosen to teach the math.
Read at 1825:
http://www.fisica.edu.uy/cursos/elec...omagnetism.pdf

It is unfortunate that you do not know the electrDYNAMICS by Ampere and
Maxwell.
It should be interesting to you.
Maxwell did not write "Maxwell's equations".
S*

Sidebands
 

On 28/12/2010 17:47, Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"K1TTT" wrote
...

be sure NOT to ask in here, since we are obviously not normal
people.... i'm more interested in how mr.B thinks sidebands are
distance dependent than what broadcast radio is.

Here you a

Look at the damped waves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave

They are like the AM.

Next look at Mr. Russell's animation:
http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/.../solitons.html

He wrote: "a.. The speed of the wave depends on the height of the wave."

The speed of the disturbance in media is the amplitude dependent - it is
the physics law.

He was talking about surface waves on water!!!!!

Jeff

Sidebands
 

On Dec 29, 9:17*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
*"K1TTT" ...
On Dec 28, 6:08 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:



Yes. But EM waves are Heaviside's paper waves. In rality are Tesla's
waves.
Do not be lazy and look for evidences.
S*
There is no 'evidences' for that. *Maxwell's equations describe EM

waves perfectly well, have been verified by experiments for over 100
years, and work fine for me.

Biot-Savart and Heaviside made *the very simple model. So simple that it was
choosen to teach the math.
Read at 1825:http://www.fisica.edu.uy/cursos/elec...ial/A_Brief_Hi...

It is unfortunate that you do not know the electrDYNAMICS by Ampere and
Maxwell.
It should be interesting to you.
Maxwell did not write "Maxwell's equations".
S*

Maxwell's equations include Ampere's law, Faraday's law, and Gauss's
law... so all the dynamics and statics are included. According to my
history the set of 4 equations was first written by Maxwell in 1863,
though in a different form than they are customarily seen today.

Sidebands
 

On Dec 29, 11:09*am, Jeff wrote:
On 28/12/2010 17:47, Szczepan Bialek wrote:





"K1TTT" wrote
....

be sure NOT to ask in here, since we are obviously not normal
people.... i'm more interested in how mr.B thinks sidebands are
distance dependent than what broadcast radio is.

Here you a

Look at the damped waves:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave

They are like the AM.

Next look at Mr. Russell's animation:
http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/.../solitons.html

He wrote: "a.. The speed of the wave depends on the height of the wave."

The speed of the disturbance in media is the amplitude dependent - it is
the physics law.

He was talking about surface waves on water!!!!!

Jeff

similar, he was referring to an article on solitons which were first
observed on water... but which bear no resemblance to EM waves.

Sidebands
 

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Biot-Savart and Heaviside made the very simple model. So simple that it was
choosen to teach the math.
Read at 1825:
http://www.fisica.edu.uy/cursos/elec...omagnetism.pdf

It is unfortunate that you do not know the electrDYNAMICS by Ampere and
Maxwell.
It should be interesting to you.
Maxwell did not write "Maxwell's equations".
S*

As usual, just a bunch of babbling nonsense.

The only thing interesting thing is the link which you obviously don't
understand.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Sidebands
 

K1TTT wrote:
On Dec 29, 11:09Â*am, Jeff wrote:
On 28/12/2010 17:47, Szczepan Bialek wrote:





"K1TTT" wrote
...

be sure NOT to ask in here, since we are obviously not normal
people.... i'm more interested in how mr.B thinks sidebands are
distance dependent than what broadcast radio is.

Here you a

Look at the damped waves:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave

They are like the AM.

Next look at Mr. Russell's animation:
http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/.../solitons.html

He wrote: "a.. The speed of the wave depends on the height of the wave."

The speed of the disturbance in media is the amplitude dependent - it is
the physics law.

He was talking about surface waves on water!!!!!

Jeff

similar, he was referring to an article on solitons which were first
observed on water... but which bear no resemblance to EM waves.

And he hasn't a clue that solitons require a medium to exist while EM does
not.

To him, an EM wave, a sound wave, a water wave, and a female member of the
Navy in 1944 are all the same thing.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Sidebands
 

Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci
...
On Dec 29, 11:09 am, Jeff wrote:
On 28/12/2010 17:47, Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Look at the damped waves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave

They are like the AM.

Next look at Mr. Russell's animation:
http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/.../solitons.html

He wrote: "a.. The speed of the wave depends on the height of the wave."

The speed of the disturbance in media is the amplitude dependent - it is
the physics law.

He was talking about surface waves on water!!!!!

Jeff

similar, he was referring to an article on solitons which were first
observed on water... but which bear no resemblance to EM waves.

Yes. But it bear resemblance to ELECTRIC waves.
S*