![]() |
Sidebands
Użytkownik napisał w wiadomości ... To him, an EM wave, a sound wave, a water wave, and a female member of the Navy in 1944 are all the same thing. You do not read my posts. To me an radio wave, a sound wave, a water wave, are all the same thing. S* |
Sidebands
On Dec 29, 5:22*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w ... On Dec 29, 11:09 am, Jeff wrote: On 28/12/2010 17:47, Szczepan Bialek wrote: Look at the damped waves: *http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave They are like the AM. Next look at Mr. Russell's animation: *http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/.../solitons.html He wrote: "a.. The speed of the wave depends on the height of the wave." The speed of the disturbance in media is the amplitude dependent - it is the physics law. He was talking about surface waves on water!!!!! Jeff similar, he was referring to an article on solitons which were first observed on water... but which bear no resemblance to EM waves. Yes. But it bear resemblance to ELECTRIC waves. S* Give me the equations for an 'electric wave'. |
Sidebands
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Użytkownik napisał w wiadomości ... To him, an EM wave, a sound wave, a water wave, and a female member of the Navy in 1944 are all the same thing. You do not read my posts. To me an radio wave, a sound wave, a water wave, are all the same thing. S* And you are an idiot for thinking that. They all share SOME properties, but they are three different things. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Sidebands
Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci ... On Dec 29, 9:17 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote: Biot-Savart and Heaviside made the very simple model. So simple that it was choosen to teach the math. Read at 1825: http://www.fisica.edu.uy/cursos/elec...ial/A_Brief_Hi... It is unfortunate that you do not know the electrDYNAMICS by Ampere and Maxwell. It should be interesting to you. Maxwell did not write "Maxwell's equations". S* Maxwell's equations include Ampere's law, It has name "Amperes law". It is Biot-Savart law with the displacement current added by Maxwell. Faraday's law, and Gauss's law... so all the dynamics and statics are included. According to my history the set of 4 equations was first written by Maxwell in 1863, though in a different form than they are customarily seen today. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations "Maxwell's equations are named after the Scottish physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell, since they are all found in a four-part paper, On Physical Lines of Force, which he published between 1861 and 1862. The mathematical form of the Lorentz force law also appeared in this paper." " (As noted above, this terminology is not common: Modern references to the term "Maxwell's equations" refer to the Heaviside restatements.)" In Maxwell's paper were 20 equations to describe this model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mo...rtex_Model.jpg There are the cross section of the magnetic lines of force. They rotate but nothing is flowing along them. The rotations rotate the plane of light polarisation inside of the solenoid. In Heaviside's "restatement" something flow along the lines and they do not rotate. Take a glance at: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Phy...Lines_of_Force Excelent English. Perfect physics. S* |
Sidebands
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci ... On Dec 29, 11:09 am, Jeff wrote: On 28/12/2010 17:47, Szczepan Bialek wrote: Look at the damped waves: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Damped_wave They are like the AM. Next look at Mr. Russell's animation: http://paws.kettering.edu/~drussell/.../solitons.html He wrote: "a.. The speed of the wave depends on the height of the wave." The speed of the disturbance in media is the amplitude dependent - it is the physics law. He was talking about surface waves on water!!!!! Jeff similar, he was referring to an article on solitons which were first observed on water... but which bear no resemblance to EM waves. Yes. But it bear resemblance to ELECTRIC waves. S* This should be good... Tell us what is an "electric wave" that isn't a part of an "elecromagnetic wave". -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Sidebands
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
It has name "Amperes law". It is Biot-Savart law with the displacement current added by Maxwell. Faraday's law, and Gauss's law... so all the dynamics and statics are included. According to my history the set of 4 equations was first written by Maxwell in 1863, though in a different form than they are customarily seen today. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations "Maxwell's equations are named after the Scottish physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell, since they are all found in a four-part paper, On Physical Lines of Force, which he published between 1861 and 1862. The mathematical form of the Lorentz force law also appeared in this paper." Oh goody, you can cut and paste from a web page. Too bad you don't know what any of what you quoted means. " (As noted above, this terminology is not common: Modern references to the term "Maxwell's equations" refer to the Heaviside restatements.)" In Maxwell's paper were 20 equations to describe this model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mo...rtex_Model.jpg There are the cross section of the magnetic lines of force. They rotate but nothing is flowing along them. The rotations rotate the plane of light polarisation inside of the solenoid. Pure, babbling, word salad gibberish. The Moleculare Vortex Model refers to magnetic fields, not electromagnetic fields and there is no light of any polarizatin inside a solenoid. In Heaviside's "restatement" something flow along the lines and they do not rotate. Take a glance at: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Phy...Lines_of_Force Excelent English. Perfect physics. S* What a buffoon. You haven't a clue what any of your referenced links mean. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Sidebands
On Dec 29, 6:41*pm, wrote:
Szczepan Bialek wrote: It has name "Amperes law". It is Biot-Savart law with the displacement current added by Maxwell. Faraday's law, and Gauss's law... so all the dynamics and statics are included. *According to my history the set of 4 equations was first written by Maxwell in 1863, though in a different form than they are customarily seen today. See:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations "Maxwell's equations are named after the Scottish physicist and mathematician James Clerk Maxwell, since they are all found in a four-part paper, On Physical Lines of Force, which he published between 1861 and 1862. The mathematical form of the Lorentz force law also appeared in this paper." Oh goody, you can cut and paste from a web page. Too bad you don't know what any of what you quoted means. " (As noted above, this terminology is not common: Modern references to the term "Maxwell's equations" refer to the Heaviside restatements.)" In Maxwell's paper *were 20 equations to describe this model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mo...rtex_Model.jpg There are the cross section of the magnetic lines of force. They rotate but nothing is flowing along them. The rotations rotate the plane of light polarisation inside of the solenoid. Pure, babbling, word salad gibberish. The Moleculare Vortex Model refers to magnetic fields, not electromagnetic fields and there is no light of any polarizatin inside a solenoid. In Heaviside's "restatement" something flow along the lines and they do not rotate. Take a glance at:http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Phy...Lines_of_Force Excelent English. Perfect physics. S* What a buffoon. You haven't a clue what any of your referenced links mean. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. not only that but the reference is an article from a magazine published years before the completed set of Maxwell's equations were first published. During those years there were many changes in the understanding of electricity and magnetism and EM waves... not that the initial publication of Maxwell's equations completely converted those who had different viewpoints, obviously aetherists and adherents to other old and disproved theories still exist despite 150 years of experiments that have failed to damage Maxwell's equations. |
Sidebands
|
Sidebands
On Dec 29, 7:04*pm, Allodoxaphobia
wrote: On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:56:30 -0000, wrote: To him, an EM wave, a sound wave, a water wave, and a female member of the Navy in 1944 are all the same thing. You forgot stadium wave. Please, God, let this Subject: die! no, keep it going! its still good for at least a few more laughs before mr.b gives up again. |
Sidebands
Uzytkownik "K1TTT" napisal w wiadomosci ... On Dec 29, 6:41 pm, wrote: Szczepan Bialek wrote: In Heaviside's "restatement" something flow along the lines and they do not rotate. Take a glance at: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_Phy...Lines_of_Force Excelent English. Perfect physics. S* What a buffoon. You haven't a clue what any of your referenced links mean. -- Jim Pennino not only that but the reference is an article from a magazine published years before the completed set of Maxwell's equations were first published. During those years there were many changes in the understanding of electricity and magnetism and EM waves... not that the initial publication of Maxwell's equations completely converted those who had different viewpoints, obviously aetherists and adherents to other old and disproved theories still exist despite 150 years of experiments that have failed to damage Maxwell's equations. See at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Co...Dawes_1920.png There is shown the magnetic flux (Heaviside). Tell me which physical law produce it (the hand rule is not a physical law). Now see at Maxwell's model: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mo...rtex_Model.jpg There the curent in the solenoid physically rotate the magnetic lines of force. So " During those years there were many changes in the understanding of electricity and magnetism" and the hand rule becomes a physical law. S* |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com