| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
|
Michael Coslo wrote:
It's 100 percent true. An Apple costs more than a Windows computer - although not all that much when comparable performance is taken into account, because the Apple mentality does not sell computers that are ready to be obsolete, such as the horribly underpowered Vista basic machines. I'm not that sure about that. At work we still have Windows XP machines bought in 2001, and while they are very slow they still work and can be used e.g. as Citrix terminals or for Microsoft Office 2003. They still receive security updates from Microsoft. Apple machines from that era are long obsolete and receive no support at all. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| holl back girl back girl holla mp3 aint no holla back girl lyrics | Shortwave | |||
| Front-to-back ratio for UHF antenna | Antenna | |||
| Flipping the Inverted "L" Antenna 'Back-to-Front' = Better Performance | Shortwave | |||
| calculate front/back ratio of Yagi antenna? | Antenna | |||