Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 8th 12, 11:41 PM posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,336
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength

On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:00:12 -0600, amdx wrote:

I'm on a boat, about 170ft from the utility post.


Ok, 200ft of coax. Presumably RG6a/u.

Recently our cable company switched to the wonderful world of
Digital TV.


You have been assimilated. Resistance is futile.

I got the new digital converter and had no picture.


Something is wrong. The nominal signal from the cable drop is suppose
to be 0dBm. If there's a splitter involved, they like to crank it up
to about 10dBm. Your 200ft of RG6a/u will drop the signal from
between 4dB at the low end, to about 6dB at the high end. Your set
top box is suppose to operate with a 10dB margin. If you would kindly
disclose the maker and model, it might be possible to find the specs.
Typically, you'll have at least 10dB margin. Even with 200ft of coax,
you should have 4 to 6dB margin.

Drag your cable box and TV over to the splitter and try it on the
incoming drop. If that works, move to the ports on the splitter. Make
sure that the unused ports are terminated properly. If that doesn't
work, call your unfriendly cable company and ask them why they don't
have sufficient level to operate your set top box without the 200ft
cable. If it does work, find a 200ft RG6a/u cable that isn't
saturated with water. Try to get some compressing fittings instead of
the crappy crimp type.

Your unspecified cable set top box may also have some user accessible
diagnostics which include per channel signal levels. You may want to
check those.

I'm not familiar with Knology, but I suspect they do the same thing as
Comcast. With Comcast, the lower 72 channels are still analog in my
area. If so, you can probably plug your TV directly into the cable,
set the TV for cable frequencies, not broadcast, and see if that still
plays.

Hint: Troubleshoot by substitution.

Drivel: I spent about an hour troubleshooting my TV distribution
system, only to find a brand new Type F "barrel" connector, with no
center connections. That which is most obviously correct, beyond any
need of checking, is usually the problem.

--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com
#
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
  #2   Report Post  
Old February 9th 12, 12:38 AM posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,336
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength

On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:41:08 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:

Your 200ft of RG6a/u will drop the signal from
between 4dB at the low end, to about 6dB at the high end.


Some better numbers for RG6a/u:
Freq Atten
MHz -dB
10 0.8
50 1.4
100 2.9
200 4.3
400 6.4
1000 11.0

The CATV band is approximately 50 to 800MHz. With 200ft of cable, you
should see 2.8 to 16dB of loss. While there may be problem at the
high channels, all the lower channels should work.

The 4 way splitter has a loss of about -7dB.

Picking a random set top box:
http://www.zoran.com/IMG/pdf/Simplify_NextGen_STBs_Solutions.pdf
See Page 3. Sensitivity is -18dBm for 256QAM and -24dBm 64QAM.

At the low end, you have 0dBm in, 7dB loss in the splitter, 2.8dB loss
in the coax, resulting in -9.8dBm to the box. That's much more than
the -18dBm/-24dBm needed.

However, at the high end, things are not so wonderful. 0dbm in, 7dB
loss in the splitter, and 16dB loss in the coax, which delivers
-23dBm. That's 1dB of margin, which is not very good. Still, it
should work on the lower channels.


--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
# http://802.11junk.com
#
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS
  #3   Report Post  
Old February 9th 12, 01:30 AM posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 23
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength

On 2/8/2012 6:38 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:41:08 -0800, Jeff
wrote:

Your 200ft of RG6a/u will drop the signal from
between 4dB at the low end, to about 6dB at the high end.


Some better numbers for RG6a/u:
Freq Atten
MHz -dB
10 0.8
50 1.4
100 2.9
200 4.3
400 6.4
1000 11.0

The CATV band is approximately 50 to 800MHz. With 200ft of cable, you
should see 2.8 to 16dB of loss. While there may be problem at the
high channels, all the lower channels should work.


Any idea where channel 428 would be in that frequency range?
That's a duplicate of 4,2 but in HD, and it works when 42 doesn't.

The 4 way splitter has a loss of about -7dB.


Just a point. I may not have made it clear. I had the tech put in two
2way splitters and connect me to the first one. Hoping to gain 3db.
(or 4) and it did make a difference.



Picking a random set top box:
http://www.zoran.com/IMG/pdf/Simplify_NextGen_STBs_Solutions.pdf
See Page 3. Sensitivity is -18dBm for 256QAM and -24dBm 64QAM.

At the low end, you have 0dBm in, 7dB loss in the splitter, 2.8dB loss
in the coax, resulting in -9.8dBm to the box. That's much more than
the -18dBm/-24dBm needed.

However, at the high end, things are not so wonderful. 0dbm in, 7dB
loss in the splitter, and 16dB loss in the coax, which delivers
-23dBm. That's 1dB of margin, which is not very good. Still, it
should work on the lower channels.



  #4   Report Post  
Old February 9th 12, 01:50 AM posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2010
Posts: 23
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength

amdx wrote:
On 2/8/2012 6:38 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:41:08 -0800, Jeff
wrote:

Your 200ft of RG6a/u will drop the signal from
between 4dB at the low end, to about 6dB at the high end.


Some better numbers for RG6a/u:
Freq Atten
MHz -dB
10 0.8
50 1.4
100 2.9
200 4.3
400 6.4
1000 11.0

The CATV band is approximately 50 to 800MHz. With 200ft of cable, you
should see 2.8 to 16dB of loss. While there may be problem at the
high channels, all the lower channels should work.


Any idea where channel 428 would be in that frequency range?
That's a duplicate of 4,2 but in HD, and it works when 42 doesn't.



I believe that's entirely up to the cable company, you'd have to ask an
engineer there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_cable

Quote "For example, a cable company might call channel 5-1 "channel 732"
and channel 5-2 "channel 733"".


The 4 way splitter has a loss of about -7dB.


Just a point. I may not have made it clear. I had the tech put in two
2way splitters and connect me to the first one. Hoping to gain 3db.
(or 4) and it did make a difference.


Where does the other leg of that splitter go to? And is that end
properly terminated?

[...]

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
  #5   Report Post  
Old February 9th 12, 02:21 AM posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 27
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength



Just a point. I may not have made it clear. I had the tech put in two
2way splitters and connect me to the first one. Hoping to gain 3db.
(or 4) and it did make a difference.


Where does the other leg of that splitter go to? And is that end
properly terminated?

[...]

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/


right good question...OP, when you had the analog signal, was there
significant ghosting?

digital boxes might tolerate a WEAK signal but they are intolerant of
reflections.

Mark




  #6   Report Post  
Old February 9th 12, 02:52 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Feb 2012
Posts: 45
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength

On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:21:19 -0800 (PST), Mark wrote:



Just a point. I may not have made it clear. I had the tech put in two
2way splitters and connect me to the first one. Hoping to gain 3db.
(or 4) and it did make a difference.


Where does the other leg of that splitter go to? And is that end
properly terminated?



Cable installers terminating things? You must be ****ing joking.
They would have to have an IQ above 25 for that.

[...]

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/


right good question...OP, when you had the analog signal, was there
significant ghosting?

digital boxes might tolerate a WEAK signal but they are intolerant of
reflections.


Why would there be a reflection in a closed cable run?
  #7   Report Post  
Old February 9th 12, 03:44 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2010
Posts: 13
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength

On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:52:10 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:21:19 -0800 (PST), Mark wrote:



Just a point. I may not have made it clear. I had the tech put in two
2way splitters and connect me to the first one. Hoping to gain 3db.
(or 4) and it did make a difference.

Where does the other leg of that splitter go to? And is that end
properly terminated?



Cable installers terminating things? You must be ****ing joking.
They would have to have an IQ above 25 for that.


*WAY* above your pay grade.
  #8   Report Post  
Old February 9th 12, 04:17 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
tom tom is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: May 2009
Posts: 660
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength

On 2/8/2012 8:52 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:21:19 -0800 (PST), wrote:



Just a point. I may not have made it clear. I had the tech put in two
2way splitters and connect me to the first one. Hoping to gain 3db.
(or 4) and it did make a difference.

Where does the other leg of that splitter go to? And is that end
properly terminated?



Cable installers terminating things? You must be bleeping joking.
They would have to have an IQ above 25 for that.


Which would obviously be considerably greater than yours.

tom
K0TAR
  #9   Report Post  
Old February 9th 12, 01:18 PM posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 23
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength

On 2/8/2012 8:21 PM, Mark wrote:


Just a point. I may not have made it clear. I had the tech put in two
2way splitters and connect me to the first one. Hoping to gain 3db.
(or 4) and it did make a difference.


Where does the other leg of that splitter go to? And is that end
properly terminated?

[...]

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/


right good question...OP, when you had the analog signal, was there
significant ghosting?

digital boxes might tolerate a WEAK signal but they are intolerant of
reflections.

Mark



Never noticed any ghosting with the analog.
Mikek
  #10   Report Post  
Old February 9th 12, 01:06 PM posted to sci.electronics.repair,rec.radio.amateur.antenna,sci.electronics.design
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2012
Posts: 23
Default Increasing Cable TV signal strength

On 2/8/2012 7:50 PM, Joerg wrote:
amdx wrote:
On 2/8/2012 6:38 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 15:41:08 -0800, Jeff
wrote:

Your 200ft of RG6a/u will drop the signal from
between 4dB at the low end, to about 6dB at the high end.

Some better numbers for RG6a/u:
Freq Atten
MHz -dB
10 0.8
50 1.4
100 2.9
200 4.3
400 6.4
1000 11.0

The CATV band is approximately 50 to 800MHz. With 200ft of cable, you
should see 2.8 to 16dB of loss. While there may be problem at the
high channels, all the lower channels should work.


Any idea where channel 428 would be in that frequency range?
That's a duplicate of 4,2 but in HD, and it works when 42 doesn't.



I believe that's entirely up to the cable company, you'd have to ask an
engineer there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_cable

Quote "For example, a cable company might call channel 5-1 "channel 732"
and channel 5-2 "channel 733"".


The 4 way splitter has a loss of about -7dB.


Just a point. I may not have made it clear. I had the tech put in two
2way splitters and connect me to the first one. Hoping to gain 3db.
(or 4) and it did make a difference.


Where does the other leg of that splitter go to? And is that end
properly terminated?

[...]

They go to two other outlets, that are used for transient boaters.
sometimes they are used and sometimes they sit unterminated.
I have not seen my problem better or worse when boats are in or out.
But I have several 75 ohm F connector terminations. It's worth a try.
Mikek


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tecsun PL-310 Signal Strength Metering Richard Fry Shortwave 4 May 17th 10 10:58 PM
What's Your Signal Strength? Chuck Shortwave 4 October 6th 04 10:51 PM
Signal Strength Suggestions Nickolas Antenna 4 August 30th 04 04:53 PM
APRS and signal strength.. Joel Homebrew 0 January 4th 04 11:13 PM
APRS and signal strength.. Joel Homebrew 0 January 4th 04 11:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017