Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, JIMMIE writes On Feb 10, 11:38*am, Jeff Liebermann wrote: On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:17:03 -0800 (PST), JIMMIE wrote: Jeff, I installed TVRO systems for several years and used a lot of F connectors. Suprisingly the ones I found that worked best were the ultra cheap ones that only took a pair of pliers to fasten *These were the ones with the separate crimp rings. Used with some good quality heat shrink tubing this eliminated most of the problems you mention. I dont know why these connectors went away, my only guess is *that someone wasn't making enough money on them. Jimmie Yech... Please try this test. *Insert such a crimp type F connector and cable into some useless piece of equipment with a type F jack. *Pull on the cable hard. *In my experience, it doesn't take much to make the cable and connector part ways. *Repeat with a screw on connector. *Now, repeat the experiment using a properly assembled compression type F connector and cable. *It takes considerably more brute force to break the connection. *I think the official minimum pull test is 55 lbs, but I'm too lazy to Google for it now. Hiding the workmanship under shrink tube is not very functional. *It will have little effect on the pull test. Most of the cable leakage problems I've seen (and found) were due to crimp type F connectors coming apart or badly crimped. *That includes both the hex shaped crimp, and ones held together with a crimped ring. Bad: http://www.fconnector.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/F-Connector2.jpg Worse: http://www.showmecables.com/images/catalog/product/F-connector-RG59.j... Good: http://images.lowes.com/product/converted/783250/783250926510lg.jpg -- Jeff Liebermann * * 150 Felker St #D * *http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann * * AE6KS * *831-336-255 Sorry Jeff but I never used my connectors to support my cables. You may be right but completely irrelevant to me. To me F connector and good connection shouldn't even be used in the same sentence. They are what that are, cheap connectors at best that uses the center conductor of the cable for a contact. Now that is Yech. Heat shrink has nothing to do with the pull test or hiding poor workmanship but it does help keep corrosion down which is the biggest problem with F connectors. Ive never seen one pull apart except in the shoddiest of installations. One of the best things I have found to insure you maintain a good connection is to apply something like DeOxit to the connectors when you assemble them. Best done while all the parts are new. There little wrong with good quality F-connectors. They are generally good enough for what they were intended for. Problems are usually down to who installs them, and how. For personal outdoor use, I always give any connectors a squirt of WD40 - both during and after installation. [I guess DeOxit would be similar or better.] After cleaning off most of the WD40, I then seal with self-amalgamating tape. Obviously, heatshrink would be better, but for me, is usually less convenient. Mechanically, even screw-on Fs can be hard to dislodge, provided just the right amount of braid is trapped under the screw thread. However, I suppose that sometimes they might not provide the ultimate in screening. In the UK, in the large CATV networks, crimped connectors are well and truly a thing of the past. Anyone using them (even the good ones) would be liable to be hung, drawn and quartered, and then severely punished. The standard connector is of the 'Snap and Seal' type (and similar). In themselves, these are pretty well watertight, and the screening is excellent. It should be almost impossible to pull one off the cable. However, it is unusual for F-connections to appear naked in the open air. The final RF distribution to the home is invariably from a street cabinet which houses an optical node or an RF distribution / line extender amplifier feeding a bank of taps/splitters. The 'traditional' cascade of in-line taps has not been used for a very long time. Under these relatively benign conditions, the F-connectors probably suffer much less from corrosion than those used on taps hanging on aerial messenger wires, USA-style. Nevertheless, there are various purpose-made short 'chunky' rubber sleeves which can be installed first on the tap ports before the cable connectors are screwed on. These seal the screw threads. Personally, I would have liked to have seen a bit of WD40 used but I never managed to drum up much enthusiasm for this as an approved practice. -- Ian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Tecsun PL-310 Signal Strength Metering | Shortwave | |||
What's Your Signal Strength? | Shortwave | |||
Signal Strength Suggestions | Antenna | |||
APRS and signal strength.. | Homebrew | |||
APRS and signal strength.. | Homebrew |