Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 11th 15, 06:40 PM posted to uk.radio.amateur,rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default Furthe questions to the RF Photonists amongst you.

In rec.radio.amateur.antenna gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message
...
On 9/11/2015 6:44 AM, gareth wrote:

2. If you claim that your RF photons are generated by the same
intra-atomic
processes that generate light, then why do we need the so many trillions
of
atoms
that make for a half-wave dipole?


They aren't needed.


So we could have antennae that are only one molecule high, do you mean?


First you would have to be able to understand that electromagnetic energy
can be generated by more than one mechanism.



--
Jim Pennino
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The RF photonists gareth Antenna 9 September 11th 15 07:46 AM
A question for the RF Photonists amongst you gareth Antenna 1 September 10th 15 08:04 PM
Question Guy's Questions Raises More Questions nurk_fred2000 Shortwave 10 December 24th 09 07:42 PM
ATV questions David Harper Equipment 0 May 3rd 04 12:44 PM
BEWARE SPENDING TIME ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE (WAS Electronic Questions) CW Antenna 1 September 5th 03 06:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017