Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Furthe questions to the RF Photonists amongst you.
On 11/09/2015 11:44, gareth wrote:
1. If your RF photons are merely a packet of energy for which it is meaningless to talk about frequency, what is the difference between your RF photons when listening to a signal on 14.1 MHz and those of your RF photons when listening to a signal on 472 kHz? Frequency. 2. If you claim that your RF photons are generated by the same intra-atomic processes that generate light, then why do we need the so many trillions of atoms that make for a half-wave dipole? To get trillions and trillions of photons to carry the energy in the same way that a wartime searchlight is bigger than my old pocket torch. 3. Also, if your RF photons are generated by that same intra-atomic process, then what must be the laser / maser like process that induces all the atoms in a half-wave dipole to produce the photons in the appropriate phase relationship? No. A laser/maser produces coherent photons, all at the same frequency and direction. Normal processes produce incoherent photons of a wide range of frequencies and direction. There is no "RF laser" operating in an antenna otherwise the gain would be spectacular. 4. When I listen to a single dit, the E of Morse (Really Vail?) Code, if the photon has no beginning, no end, and no am modulation to bring about such a beginning and end, then why do I not hear a continuous never-ending dit? This has already been explained to you in other threads. I quote "Because they carry on forever passing you and going out into space the collective signal getting weaker and weaker according to the inverse square law. If our sun were to vanish suddenly the light it put out would still carry on. We would be in darkness after about 8 minutes but someone near Jupiter would still see it and someone in a different solar system would still see the light after years." 5. Why do some of you blithely quote URLs at me? Is it because you don't really understand matters yourselves and are thus incapable of joining in a gentlemanly discussion, whether you agree, or not, with what I propose? Why do you post questions and then ignore the answers and just repeat the questions on a new thread? Andy |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The RF photonists | Antenna | |||
A question for the RF Photonists amongst you | Antenna | |||
Question Guy's Questions Raises More Questions | Shortwave | |||
ATV questions | Equipment | |||
BEWARE SPENDING TIME ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE (WAS Electronic Questions) | Antenna |