"Fractenna"
Sisna...I'm glad I met 'ya.
Good luck to YOU Mr. Bogus:-)

And *I* have alerted AOL to YOUR antics Sir!

Bwahahahaha...

Ya big twit.

And *I* have alerted AOL to YOUR antics Sir!

Bwahahahaha...

Ya big twit.

No problem. I've been down this path before; it doesn't work because there's
nothing to be alerted to. It does help though, in documenting.

73,
Chip N1IR

"Fractenna"
I've been down this path before; it doesn't work
because there's nothing to be alerted to.

Yeah, I know. Cuts both ways. But unlike you - I realize when I'm shooting
blanks ("Sisna" - puhfreakingleese...). Ya Big Twit.

It does help though, in documenting.

The N1IR files must be overflowing (smirk). Will 'The Stacks' be buried
with you when you die, or just recycled (thereby driving down the price of
used paper by 40% for six months)?

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 21 Oct 2004 21:16:21 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

"Fractal Antenna Systems, Inc. was founded in 1995 by Nathan Cohen, now a
recently retired Boston University telecommunications professor and radio
astronomer."

Hi John,

Your information is incomplete.

Hi, Richard -

It isn't my information. It came off the Fractal Antenna Systems Web site.

Nevertheless, it doesn't matter any more. I've killfiled him because I
believe he has nothing of value to contribute to this group and is
essentially trolling. This a game to him.

John

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:40:53 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

It isn't my information. It came off the Fractal Antenna Systems Web site.

Hi John,

Possibly a mistake of association then. Historically, correspondence
from this account has offered a multiplicity of supposed authors hence
authenticity is dubious at best.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Will 'The Stacks' be buried
with you when you die,

That won't be any time soon. I hiked about 300 miles this year and I look about
20 years younger than my age. I take no medication. So, good luck.

73,
Chip N1IR

Hi John,

Possibly a mistake of association then. Historically, correspondence
from this account has offered a multiplicity of supposed authors hence
authenticity is dubious at best.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC




Hi Richard,

Please ID the "techno-fraud" which you expose in your fractal antenna
website--that's your word. And what patents do you claim your amateur web page
has managed to render useless? You said this too.Hmmm:-)?

And what exactly is this early 1800's prior art you allude to that renders
fractal antennas as public domain? Perhaps you have a knowledge base which
extends before Hertz, and even Maxwell:-)?

I am sure I am not the only one who would share the fascination of details to
your claims.

You are not a man short of words; use a few words to flesh it out, kindly.

73,
Chip N1IR

"Fractenna"
I take no medication.

Ah - then there is the problem.

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 03:40:53 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:

It isn't my information. It came off the Fractal Antenna Systems Web site.

Hi John,

Possibly a mistake of association then. Historically, correspondence
from this account has offered a multiplicity of supposed authors hence
authenticity is dubious at best.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Your stilted language is difficult for me to understand, Richard.

To what account are you referring?

Do you mean the association of Cohen to Fractal Antennas to N1IR? It is a
coincidence that a person who uses the screen name fractenna and signs his
posts as N1IR happens to have the same name as the person who founded
Fractal Antenna Systems, lives in the same area, and vehemently supports
fractal antennas?

John

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:24:45 GMT, "John Smith"
wrote:
?

Hi John,

Historically, there have been MANY authors, all making claims to be
different persons OR there has been ONE author claiming to be
different persons FROM ONE account that is not a professional address.
ALL supposed authors claim to be working for a commercial business
selling fractal antennas. However, this is strictly speculation as
absolutely no evidence of this commercial pursuit is apparent in ANY
correspondence.

Stilted or otherwise, the confusion resides at one common point
originating these messages. In just the past week I've seen several
messages posted by two sides of a dialogue BOTH claiming to be the
same correspondent from different addresses. Signatures at the bottom
of a post are a wholly insecure means of asserting identity. Further,
individuals attempting to draw you into commercial correspondence
through non-commercial addresses (accounts) are the leading form of
Phishing. I hope this last term is not lost on you.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC