[Stephen Thomas Cole[_3_]]

J.B. Wood wrote:
On 09/13/2017 03:40 PM, rickman wrote:
amdx wrote on 9/13/2017 12:27 PM:
..

Nothing like stating the obvious. But then that assumes this group used
to be functional. Was this a viable group before QRZ polluted it?

Perhaps what you desire is a moderated ng where someone gets to decide
what is and what's not appropriate for posting. I never liked that idea
but some folks consider it an anti-spam measure. Does your newsreader
have a killfiles option? Just set it to automatically send posts you
don't want in your inbox to the trash. Problem solved. Sincerely, and
73s from N4GGO,


uk.radio.amateur.moderated is, IMO, a very good newsgroup.

--
STC / M0TEY /
http://twitter.com/ukradioamateur

[rickman]

Stephen Thomas Cole wrote on 9/15/2017 7:42 AM:
J.B. Wood wrote:
On 09/13/2017 03:40 PM, rickman wrote:
amdx wrote on 9/13/2017 12:27 PM:
..

Nothing like stating the obvious. But then that assumes this group used
to be functional. Was this a viable group before QRZ polluted it?

Perhaps what you desire is a moderated ng where someone gets to decide
what is and what's not appropriate for posting. I never liked that idea
but some folks consider it an anti-spam measure. Does your newsreader
have a killfiles option? Just set it to automatically send posts you
don't want in your inbox to the trash. Problem solved. Sincerely, and
73s from N4GGO,


uk.radio.amateur.moderated is, IMO, a very good newsgroup.

Except QRZ posts their forums there as well. Why can't anyone get to the
people responsible and stop this?

--

Rick C

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
on the centerline of totality since 1998

[Stephen Thomas Cole[_3_]]

rickman wrote:
Stephen Thomas Cole wrote on 9/15/2017 7:42 AM:
J.B. Wood wrote:
On 09/13/2017 03:40 PM, rickman wrote:
amdx wrote on 9/13/2017 12:27 PM:
..

Nothing like stating the obvious. But then that assumes this group used
to be functional. Was this a viable group before QRZ polluted it?

Perhaps what you desire is a moderated ng where someone gets to decide
what is and what's not appropriate for posting. I never liked that idea
but some folks consider it an anti-spam measure. Does your newsreader
have a killfiles option? Just set it to automatically send posts you
don't want in your inbox to the trash. Problem solved. Sincerely, and
73s from N4GGO,


uk.radio.amateur.moderated is, IMO, a very good newsgroup.

Except QRZ posts their forums there as well.

Not to ukram.

--
STC / M0TEY /
http://twitter.com/ukradioamateur

[rickman]

Stephen Thomas Cole wrote on 9/15/2017 2:49 PM:
rickman wrote:
Stephen Thomas Cole wrote on 9/15/2017 7:42 AM:
J.B. Wood wrote:
On 09/13/2017 03:40 PM, rickman wrote:
amdx wrote on 9/13/2017 12:27 PM:
..

Nothing like stating the obvious. But then that assumes this group used
to be functional. Was this a viable group before QRZ polluted it?

Perhaps what you desire is a moderated ng where someone gets to decide
what is and what's not appropriate for posting. I never liked that idea
but some folks consider it an anti-spam measure. Does your newsreader
have a killfiles option? Just set it to automatically send posts you
don't want in your inbox to the trash. Problem solved. Sincerely, and
73s from N4GGO,


uk.radio.amateur.moderated is, IMO, a very good newsgroup.

Except QRZ posts their forums there as well.

Not to ukram.

Sorry, I was looking at rram.

--

Rick C

Viewed the eclipse at Wintercrest Farms,
on the centerline of totality since 1998