Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Dec 2004 09:53:00 -0800, "
wrote: But how much better? Hi Jim, Probably not enough for you to notice. Is it worth the effort and expense? Worth is subjective, even if you feel good about, but discern no evidence of improvement in performance, that may be sufficient. I'm satisfied that the LMR400 and Radio Works balun are as low loss as I can get for this kind of system, but I can never leave well enough alone if I think there is room for improvement. As Doc suggests, goferit. Bob's advice is not uncommon either, although absorbent material could get damp and affect local line performance. The question then becomes one of our academic knot twisters in that would it matter. Myself, I see a potential short across the line and tender nearby to support combustion or smoldering. To solve my 15X15 inch basement window problem, I replaced the plate glass with Plexiglas and drilled holes with abandon. This replacement was not without taking so long a time that my buddy lost his patience: "Just bust that $5 worth of glass out!" Instead, I had to do this by carefully removing the petrified putty all around - and cracked the pane in the last nip. Care and precision is not always worth the effort. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Additional Line Losses Due to SWR | Antenna | |||
Ladder line question ???? | Antenna | |||
ladder line J-pole question | Antenna | |||
MFJ-974H Balanced Line Tuner | Antenna | |||
Complex line Z0: A numerical example | Antenna |