Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 1st 13, 07:02 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 774
Default DX-100 or Apache?

Brian Burns wrote:

I'm looking for an AM/CW rig in the 100 watt class, and may have a choice between a Heath DX-100 and a Heath Apache. In looking at the specs I could find on the two, the Apache looks like the better choice. What do you think?


Well, the Apache will send SSB, which is a good feature to have, whereas
the DX-100 won't. On the other hand, the DX-100 is much simpler, as a result.

But I would pick whichever of the two is factory-wired. If they were both
built as kits, I'd pick the one that has the best-looking solder joints.
--scott

--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 1st 13, 08:59 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 527
Default DX-100 or Apache?


"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Brian Burns wrote:

I'm looking for an AM/CW rig in the 100 watt class, and
may have a choice between a Heath DX-100 and a Heath
Apache. In looking at the specs I could find on the two,
the Apache looks like the better choice. What do you
think?


Well, the Apache will send SSB, which is a good feature to
have, whereas
the DX-100 won't. On the other hand, the DX-100 is much
simpler, as a result.

But I would pick whichever of the two is factory-wired.
If they were both
built as kits, I'd pick the one that has the best-looking
solder joints.
--scott

Good advice but if the rig is primarily for AM I would
check the manuals to see how its generated. The DX-100 is
plate modulated but most SSB rigs do AM by either injecting
carrier on one sideband or with controlled carrier or some
other scheme that will work with a linear amplifier.


--

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL



  #3   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 13, 04:57 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 527
Default DX-100 or Apache?


"Richard Knoppow" wrote in message
m...

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Brian Burns wrote:

Disregard my post. The Apache does have plate modulation,
I was confusing it with another transmitter.


--

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles
WB6KBL



  #4   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 13, 03:23 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2008
Posts: 618
Default DX-100 or Apache?

On Wed, 1 May 2013, Richard Knoppow wrote:


"Richard Knoppow" wrote in message
m...

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Brian Burns wrote:

Disregard my post. The Apache does have plate modulation,
I was confusing it with another transmitter.

But it was a valid point to check. Most SSB transmitters used low level
modulation for AM, so the Apache then becomes a relatively uncommon item,
an SSB rig that does plate modulation for AM. That tends to make it a
better choice, since it does SSB too.

Michael VE2BVW
  #5   Report Post  
Old May 2nd 13, 03:35 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 774
Default DX-100 or Apache?

Michael Black wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Richard Knoppow wrote:
"Richard Knoppow" wrote in message
m...

"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Brian Burns wrote:

Disregard my post. The Apache does have plate modulation,
I was confusing it with another transmitter.

But it was a valid point to check. Most SSB transmitters used low level
modulation for AM, so the Apache then becomes a relatively uncommon item,
an SSB rig that does plate modulation for AM. That tends to make it a
better choice, since it does SSB too.


Let me guess: this approach gives you higher output power on AM since the
final can be operated class C, but it doubles the weight of the transmitter
with that huge modulation transformer?
--scott


--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."


  #7   Report Post  
Old August 22nd 13, 11:05 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.boatanchors
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 3
Default DX-100 or Apache?

The Apache by itself does not have SSB capability. For that, you also
need the SB-10 Sideband Adapter. I had both but sold them years ago.

John

Scott Dorsey wrote:
Brian Burns wrote:

I'm looking for an AM/CW rig in the 100 watt class, and may have a choice between a Heath DX-100 and a Heath Apache. In looking at the specs I could find on the two, the Apache looks like the better choice. What do you think?


Well, the Apache will send SSB, which is a good feature to have, whereas
the DX-100 won't. On the other hand, the DX-100 is much simpler, as a result.

But I would pick whichever of the two is factory-wired. If they were both
built as kits, I'd pick the one that has the best-looking solder joints.
--scott


--
Please reply in this newsgroup. I never post my true
email address to prevent spam. Thank you.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apache help needed!! Steve Bauder Boatanchors 0 November 8th 04 04:27 AM
Apache help needed!! Steve Bauder Boatanchors 0 November 8th 04 04:27 AM
Apache and Other Gear Denis Sharon Boatanchors 0 September 27th 04 03:07 AM
WTB Heathkit DX-100 or Apache Paul Equipment 0 February 29th 04 08:40 PM
WTB Heathkit DX-100 or Apache Paul Equipment 0 February 29th 04 08:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017