Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Elmer E Ing" wrote in message news:4JdWa.18542$ff.8472@fed1read01... Well folks if you invested $595 back in the 50's at 8% interest compounded annualy it would now be about -- yep you guessed it $10,000. Or you could have bought an SX-88 and enjoyed the radio for 30+ years. Tongue in cheek of course But would it be a good investment over the next 50 years? I don't think so. Frank Dresser |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 Jul 2003 08:00:37 GMT, "pete" wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3038240975 just how rare is this? Pete KQ5I Very rare indeed. The page at http://antiqueradio.org/halli09.htm says only about sixty are known to exist. It was produced for only two years, 1954 and 1955, priced at $595!!! 73 de Leigh W3NLB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() pete wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3038240975 just how rare is this? Pete KQ5I A. More money than sense. More sense than money?? B. To have what no one else has. C. To complete a life long want. D. To have the best receiver ever made. (don't think so but....) E. Better than buying lottery tickets. Care to add more?? de Fred. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
F. Hey it is my money, I'll spend it like I want
G. What part of free enterprise is it that you don't understand? H. Money is no object (with some folks) I. Desirability is in the eye of the beholder J. You really don't want price fixing -- do you? K. Auctions are a great American tradition, get over it. "Alfred Carlson" wrote in message ... pete wrote: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3038240975 just how rare is this? Pete KQ5I A. More money than sense. More sense than money?? B. To have what no one else has. C. To complete a life long want. D. To have the best receiver ever made. (don't think so but....) E. Better than buying lottery tickets. Care to add more?? de Fred. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The SX-88 is the holy grail of Hallicrafters communications receivers. It
is the rarest, and most desirable to collectors, and there are a great many enthusiastic collectors of Hallicrafters radios. While it is absolutely not in the same class, performance-wise, as an R-390a, it is a very fine 20 tube double conversion receiver. And, there were what...30,000+ R-390a's made? As was mentioned in a previous reply, it is extremely scarce. I have read that only 60 were (if memory serves) sold. $595 was a boatload of money in 1954, and this radio was only available for two years. There were approximately 1,000 Hammarlund Pro-310's sold, and one of those in good condition will fetch near $2,000. I have seen a junk 88 parts radio bring over $1,000. I will be very, very surprised indeed if this one doesn't go well north of $5,000. Clay "pete" wrote in message news:01c35739$9543b260$991388cf@verrando... http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...tem=3038240975 just how rare is this? Pete KQ5I |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
" The SX-88 is the holy grail of Hallicrafters communications
receivers. It is the rarest, and most desirable to collectors, and there are a great many " just how rare is this? Pete KQ5I Other receivers just as rare but not nearly as expensive. The wonderful Icom R9000 will run circles around the SX88 in every parameter used and only costs $3000- 3500 on the used market and 2500 were made, selling new for $7000+. Buy the Mosley Receiver that used all the same tubes, rare, produced only 1 1/2 years but a dud on receive. So, anyone buying this has an expensive rare receiver and pays for it to just sit there. The SX73 was just as good. I have one SX88 that I paid $1500 for about 2 years ago and it is excellent. The SX115 is bringing $2000-2500 and is ham band only with same basic design plan. Go figure. Bottom line, if you have always wanted an SX88 and will at least plug it in and use it some, knowing that it will remain rare, $4000 seems reasonable. But, note the reserve has been met, far below the $4000 figure. I wud buy 2 Drake R8Bs and 2 JRC 535Ds with money to spare and hear a lot more! My SX88 sits, not plugged in. Looks a lot better than the one on eBay but NOT for sale.. San |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() hamman wrote: " The SX-88 is the holy grail of Hallicrafters communications receivers. It is the rarest, and most desirable to collectors, and there are a great many " just how rare is this? Pete KQ5I Other receivers just as rare but not nearly as expensive. The wonderful Icom R9000 will run circles around the SX88 in every parameter used and only costs $3000- 3500 on the used market and 2500 were made, selling new for $7000+. Buy the Mosley Receiver that used all the same tubes, rare, produced only 1 1/2 years but a dud on receive. I have a mint Mosley CM-1/CMS-1 and have restored 4 others for friends. Hardly consider it a dud on receive. Unlike many of its more expensive counterparts, the CM-1 has the same calibration on 10M as 80M- not all bunched up as in most RX of that era. I am, as I said in an earlier post, completely resotring an 88 and find it to be a clunky uninteresting receiver. For my $$, the 115 is far "sexier" and more interesting. In the end, I play with my little CM-1 more than any other here except perhaps the 2B/2BQ. Dale W4OP |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Clay Nicolsen" wrote in message ... The SX-88 is the holy grail of Hallicrafters communications receivers. It is the rarest, and most desirable to collectors, and there are a great many enthusiastic collectors of Hallicrafters radios. While it is absolutely not in the same class, performance-wise, as an R-390a, it is a very fine 20 tube double conversion receiver. And, there were what...30,000+ R-390a's made? As was mentioned in a previous reply, it is extremely scarce. I have read that only 60 were (if memory serves) sold. $595 was a boatload of money in 1954, and this radio was only available for two years. There were approximately 1,000 Hammarlund Pro-310's sold, and one of those in good condition will fetch near $2,000. I have seen a junk 88 parts radio bring over $1,000. I will be very, very surprised indeed if this one doesn't go well north of $5,000. Clay It may be a vintage set, but anyone who'd pay $5000 for a 50 YO radio, let alone $2000 should be put into a rubber room IMHO - grin ; ) |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "heavywater"
writes: It may be a vintage set, but anyone who'd pay $5000 for a 50 YO radio, let alone $2000 should be put into a rubber room IMHO - grin ; ) You think $5000 for an SX-88 is bad, look at this. 'Bout two years ago an unbuilt Heath AT-1 kit showed up on eBay. Still in the unopened original box, dated 1956, amking it one of the last ones made. The AT- was Heath's first attempt a t a ham transmitter. 6AG7-6L6, with 5U4G rectifier and link output. Final ran as a doubler on most bands and the efficiency was awful - typically less than 10 watts out for 35 watts in. $29.95 50 years ago. Final price of the auction: $5100. That's not a typo - five thousand one hundred dollars. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
This is basically the free enterprise system and whatever the market will bear
is what sets the price. What I don't comprehend is another situation. As an example, last year, I was following the bidding on an Icom IC-2100H. I stopped watching when the bidding got to $275 so I don't know how high it got. This was the price for a used radio without warranty at the same time it was available new, with warranty, at AES and elsewhere for $199. So if somebody is obviously online, a few key clicks searching for the radio would have saved the buyer over $75. Strange... |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|