Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() From 1988-1990, I was in college in Dayton, Ohio. At the time, there was a 5-year-old TV station (WRGT/45) which had just signed on as a FOX affiliate. Today I was at the website for another Dayton TV station, WHIO-TV 7. Their website also has information on Dayton's UPN station. Dayton's UPN station is apparently at Channel 44. I've never heard of two TV stations in the same market separated by one position on the dial. I know that for technical reasons, you can't do that with radio, and I'm trying to figure out how it's being done here. The Dayton FCC listing includes all of the stations that were there when I was in school (2, 7, 16, 22, 45), an active HDTV license on Channel 30, and HDTV applications on 41, 50 and 58. And there is an LP license on Channel 66. Nothing on 44. In Springfield, the other major city in the area (radio and TV stations generally identify themselves as "WXYZ Dayton/Springfield"), I see a WBDT-TV26, WBDT-DT18, and a couple miscellaneous LP licenses. The only stuff I can find at Channel 44 in Ohio: WTLW-TV Lima, WOUC-TV Cambridge, and W53BN Youngstown. There is not a single license for Channel 44 *anywhere* near Dayton. Not in Montgomery County, not in Clark County, not in any of the counties surrounding Dayton or Springfield. In fact, there are only a handful of records referring to TV44 anywhere in Ohio, according to the search I did on the FCC website. I'm going to e-mail the station, but they have a note that "due to the volume we receive, personal replies will not always be possible." I hope someone answers my e-mail. I'm really curious about this. References: http://www.Fox45.com/ http://www.whiotv.com/upn44/ -- JustThe.net Internet & Multimedia Services 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950 Steve Sobol, Proprietor 888.480.4NET (4638) * 248.724.4NET * |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven J. Sobol wrote:
Today I was at the website for another Dayton TV station, WHIO-TV 7. Their website also has information on Dayton's UPN station. Dayton's UPN station is apparently at Channel 44. I've never heard of two TV stations in the same market separated by one position on the dial. I know that for technical reasons, you can't do that with radio, and I'm trying to figure out how it's being done here. I believe "UPN 44" is on cable only. http://www.greaterdayton.com/localinfo.shtml (not conclusive but suggestive) The Dayton FCC listing includes all of the stations that were there when I was in school (2, 7, 16, 22, 45), an active HDTV license on Channel 30, and HDTV applications on 41, 50 and 58. And there is an LP license on Channel 66. Nothing on 44. I can't find anything about a over-the-air 44 there either. ================================================== ========= That said... Such things are no longer impossible. It looks like part of the big overhaul of the rules for DTV included relaxation of the channel-spacing requirements. Look, for example, at Philadelphia where WFPA-CA, a Class A (low-power analog) station operates on channel 28 within a mile of full-power WTXF channel 29. Or, in Boston, where full-power WFXT on channel 25 is surrounded by low-power stations WFXZ-CA (24) and WHDN-LP (26). (they even managed to shoehorn in a 3,000-watt LPTV on channel 3 in Boston, between WGBH on 2 and WBZ on 4. W38CL tried to get a permit to use channel 3 in the Bronx but failed...) Even here in Nashville, we have a low-power station on channel 26 - a full-power DTV on 27 - and a full-power analog about 30 miles east of town on 28. Now, you still can't use adjacent channels for full-power analog stations. But you can definitely get a DTV in adjacent to a full-power analog; and you can also get a low-power analog adjacent to a full-power analog. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug Smith W9WI writes:
Now, you still can't use adjacent channels for full-power analog stations. In Boston, we've had WBZ-TV Channel 4 and WCVB (once WHDH-TV) Channel 5 as long as anyone can remember. umar |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , umarc wrote:
In Boston, we've had WBZ-TV Channel 4 and WCVB (once WHDH-TV) Channel 5 as long as anyone can remember. Channels 4 and 5 are not adjacent. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | As the Constitution endures, persons in every | generation can invoke its principles in their own Opinions not those of| search for greater freedom. MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - A. Kennedy, Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. ___ (2003) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In Boston, we've had WBZ-TV Channel 4 and WCVB (once WHDH-TV) Channel 5 as
long as anyone can remember. TV Channels 4 and 5 are adjacent in number, but not in frequency. There's a 4-MHz gap between the high end of Channel 4 and the low end of Channel 5. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "umarc" wrote In Boston, we've had WBZ-TV Channel 4 and WCVB (once WHDH-TV) Channel 5 as long as anyone can remember. Channels 4 and 5 aren't actually adjacent. There's 4 mHz of spectrum in-between. Channel 4 -- 66 to 72 mHz Channel 5 -- 76 to 82 mHz -- VB |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Vinyl Bytes wrote:
Channels 4 and 5 aren't actually adjacent. There's 4 mHz of spectrum in-between. Channel 4 -- 66 to 72 mHz Channel 5 -- 76 to 82 mHz Incidentally, between 4 and 5 is where cable channel 1 lives. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , umarc wrote:
In Boston, we've had WBZ-TV Channel 4 and WCVB (once WHDH-TV) Channel 5 as long as anyone can remember. The separation between those two sets of frequencies is wide enough that such an allocation is allowable. I believe the same thing can be done with 6 and 7 (both are at opposite ends of the FM broadcast band). -- Sven Weil New York City, U.S.A. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6 Aug 2003 02:26:31 GMT, "Steven J. Sobol"
wrote: I've never heard of two TV stations in the same market separated by one position on the dial. I know that for technical reasons, you can't do that with radio, and I'm trying to figure out how it's being done here. That's because it's NOT being done here... Dayton's "UPN 44" exists solely on local cable TV. It just sounds odd, because most "cable-only" broadcast-style stations aren't as high up as cable position 44. 44, I believe, started off life as "MVC"... which I believe would stand for "Miami Valley Cablevision". WHIO-TV - which runs it (Cox, I think) - only recently started calling it "UPN 44". Mike |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven J. Sobol wrote:
Today I was at the website for another Dayton TV station, WHIO-TV 7. Their website also has information on Dayton's UPN station. Dayton's UPN station is apparently at Channel 44. Apparently not... I'm not in Dayton, but your puzzle intrigued me. It looks like the WHIO web site is the only place that makes any reference to a "UPN 44", and notice there are no call letters, just "UPN44". It looks like it's a cable-only station. If you go to one of the TV listing sites and plug in a zipcode for Dayton, then choose a cable system, you'll find a "MVC 44" listed on channel 44. Look at the listings, and they're identical to the WHIO website's listings for UPN 44. There's also a broadcast station called WWHO on channel 53, also a UPN affiliate, but it doesn't appear to be carried on cable. But getting back to your original point... there are not actually two stations in Dayton on 44 and 45. (There are some places where digital stations are on adjacent channels to analog stations, but no adjacent-channel analog-analog or digital-digital.) |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #652 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #652 | Dx | |||
Most Powerful AM Radio Stations | Broadcasting | |||
BEST sounding FM stations in your area | Broadcasting |