Ok. Rant time.

I was listening to the Dr. Laura Schlessinger radio talk show the
other day. Have you heard this? I freakin' love it. Gets me all riled
up. People from all over North America call in (over 60,000 callers a
day!) and ask her advice on their daily quandaries. The "Doctor" then
hauls her ass up on top of her ivory tower of moral superiority, and
proceeds to berate her devoted flock like they're 7 year old retards
with **** filled diapers. Anyway, today she was fervently babbling
about how "shacking up" and "having sex out of wedlock" is "the most
disturbing thing there is". Uh.. even more disturbing than running
over toddlers with a tractor? Even more disturbing than slowing
slicing your genitals with a rusty razor? Even more dis...

Well, needless to say, Dr. Laura is a moronic hag. Have you seen this
hypocrites un-doctored nude pictures on the net? It's 100% fun
listening to her angrily rail against the people who make/use/sell
porn while you jack off to a dozen pictures of her pale but perky tits
and hairy pussy. It's really one of the most simple but pure pleasures
a listener of her show will ever have in life. Especially that one
with her legs spread wide open.

Perhaps Sacramento CA. journalist Anita Creamer put it best:
"She posed in pigtails, hands on hips. She smiled brightly for the
camera, flirting and saucy and delighted, naked as the day she was
born. We wouldn't bother to care if she weren't such a sanctimonious,
mean spirited, god awful witch."

Man, when that **** hit the fan, I thought for sure Schlessinger was
gonna finally disappear under some far off religious rock. Her first
rather pathetic defense was to dishonestly claim they were "fakes".
Then, after she lost her court case to have them suppressed, she got a
big, fat, juicy painful lesson in humility after she went on the air
to state that she found them "embarrassing". Eventually the source was
revealed to be veteran Los Angeles radio broadcaster Bill Ballance, a
man who was pivotal in getting Schlessinger her start in radio, and
took the photos in 1978, while the pair of them were having an AFFAIR
during Schlessinger's first marriage! Oh sweet irony, how I adore ye.

She's really no different than Rush Limbaugh, that fat hateful dope
fiend. What the hell is with these right wing religious nuts? They
judge, condemn, and preach, and then take part in sins just as bad or
worse than those that they were ****ing and moaning about in the first
place. How about the 237 Pedophile priests in Boston up on 45 million
dollars worth of rape and molestation charges? Christ, I rest my case.

Wait.... I don't wanna rest my case. I'm having waaaay too much fun
ranting about Dr. Laura. I remember one of her callers asking if she
should let her 9 year old kid attend a coed sleepover party. Now, this
prudish, ignorant radio host could have said something like "that
would not be practical or appropriate" or some concerned parental
bull****, but instead the insane harpy flew off the handle and accused
the parents who were throwing the party of "living out their sexual
fantasies through their children". -snort-

Another classy moment from a show I heard last year was when she
claimed that society can't allow gay people - or as she horrifically
calls them: "biological errors" - to get legally married, because "a
legal precedent would be set" and we'd then have to "allow people who
have sex with their parents to get married to one another" (?!?) That
**** is just crazy enough to be hilarious. Mind you, her homophobic
comments were determined to be in violation of the human rights
provision of the Canadian Broadcasting Code of Ethics, and she lost
the majority of her stations in Canada. Ha ha. Luckily, C-Fun 1410 am
here in Vancouver continues the weekday afternoon "family values"
insanity.

The important thing to remember kids, is that Laura Schlessinger is
neither a medical doctor nor accredited in a discipline one would
traditionally look to for the generation of expertise in moral,
societal, or spiritual matters. She's just a lying hypocritical
****face with a radio show.

Perverts: The Doctor Laura porn is here. Have fun!
www.konformist.com/drlaura.htm
and he
www.bartcop.com/laura1025.htm

It's 100% fun listening to her angrily rail against the people who
make/use/sell porn while you jack off to a dozen pictures of her pale but perky
tits and hairy pussy. It's really one of the most simple but pure pleasures a
listener of her show will ever have in life. Especially that one with her legs
spread wide open.


Good one!

On 17 May 2004 15:10:12 GMT, (The Bougieman)
wrote:

I was listening to the Dr. Laura Schlessinger radio talk show the
other day. Have you heard this? I freakin' love it. Gets me all riled
up. People from all over North America call in (over 60,000 callers a
day!) and ask her advice on their daily quandaries.

Let's put this into perspective. There may be 60,000 callers who
attempt to reach the show. Telco can give you a report on the number
of attempted calls. Only a few of those actually make it to the
guillotine. I'm surprised there aren't more masochists within some
radio signal.

To be fair I have to reveal that Laura Schlessinger and I intensely
dislike each other. She once tried to get me fired because I
consistently pointed out that my host, Dr. Joy Browne, was a real
psychologist and Schlessinger was s Physiologist. Howard Stern called
her a "gym teacher."

Well, needless to say, Dr. Laura is a moronic hag. Have you seen this
hypocrites un-doctored nude pictures on the net?

This is very old stuff. As much as I dislike and disrespect her I
think the release of those pictures was a terrible betrayal of trust.
How many of us took such pictures when we discovered Polaroid cameras?
Supposing you had a companion and you took pictures of each other. It
would have been done with the full expectation of privacy between you
both.

The pictures were taken before she became perfect. So she lied a
little in denying thery were her. She was finally pressured into
admitting to a little imperfection as a young woman. Certainly nothing
she'd do as an old woman who has seen the light, accepted God and a
huge paycheck.

Eventually the source was
revealed to be veteran Los Angeles radio broadcaster Bill Ballance, a
man who was pivotal in getting Schlessinger her start in radio, and
took the photos in 1978, while the pair of them were having an AFFAIR
during Schlessinger's first marriage! Oh sweet irony, how I adore ye.

Again, this was pre-perfection. I had no respect for Schlessinger, so
there was none to lose. However, I did respect Ballance. His betrayal
of her caused me to lose respect for him.

Another classy moment from a show I heard last year was when she
claimed that society can't allow gay people - or as she horrifically
calls them: "biological errors" - to get legally married, because "a
legal precedent would be set" and we'd then have to "allow people who
have sex with their parents to get married to one another" (?!?) That
**** is just crazy enough to be hilarious.

It's shtick. Unfortunately for her it cost her network the loss of $30
million in billing. The Gay community was extremely effective in
targeting her advertisers. When there's no legitimate argument for
something they grab at straws and suggest it'll result in people
marrying animals. The Radical Religious Right is very creative and
seem to turn their sexual fantasies into predictions of the future.

Mind you, her homophobic
comments were determined to be in violation of the human rights
provision of the Canadian Broadcasting Code of Ethics, and she lost
the majority of her stations in Canada.

The US has no such code of ethis. In fact, with our FCC we never know
what the rules are until we've broken them and have a whopping fine
staring us in the face.

The important thing to remember kids, is that Laura Schlessinger is
neither a medical doctor nor accredited in a discipline one would
traditionally look to for the generation of expertise in moral,
societal, or spiritual matters. She's just a lying hypocritical
****face with a radio show.

Listen to her show with the same rubbernecking approach you'd take at
seeing a serious traffic accident. The only difference is the accident
was an accident. Calling the show is simple masochism.

She is a Doctor of Physiology. She's not a Theologian (her book was
written by a Rabbi). Taking her advice is like hiring a Proctologist
to perform brain surgery.



Rich

Thats why they call her "Dr. Laura ****slinger"

"Rich Wood" wrote in message
...
On 17 May 2004 15:10:12 GMT, (The Bougieman)
wrote:

I was listening to the Dr. Laura Schlessinger radio talk show the
other day. Have you heard this? I freakin' love it. Gets me all riled
up. People from all over North America call in (over 60,000 callers a
day!) and ask her advice on their daily quandaries.

Let's put this into perspective. There may be 60,000 callers who
attempt to reach the show. Telco can give you a report on the number
of attempted calls. Only a few of those actually make it to the
guillotine. I'm surprised there aren't more masochists within some
radio signal.

To be fair I have to reveal that Laura Schlessinger and I intensely
dislike each other. She once tried to get me fired because I
consistently pointed out that my host, Dr. Joy Browne, was a real
psychologist and Schlessinger was s Physiologist. Howard Stern called
her a "gym teacher."

Well, needless to say, Dr. Laura is a moronic hag. Have you seen this
hypocrites un-doctored nude pictures on the net?

This is very old stuff. As much as I dislike and disrespect her I
think the release of those pictures was a terrible betrayal of trust.
How many of us took such pictures when we discovered Polaroid cameras?
Supposing you had a companion and you took pictures of each other. It
would have been done with the full expectation of privacy between you
both.

The pictures were taken before she became perfect. So she lied a
little in denying thery were her. She was finally pressured into
admitting to a little imperfection as a young woman. Certainly nothing
she'd do as an old woman who has seen the light, accepted God and a
huge paycheck.

Eventually the source was
revealed to be veteran Los Angeles radio broadcaster Bill Ballance, a
man who was pivotal in getting Schlessinger her start in radio, and
took the photos in 1978, while the pair of them were having an AFFAIR
during Schlessinger's first marriage! Oh sweet irony, how I adore ye.

Again, this was pre-perfection. I had no respect for Schlessinger, so
there was none to lose. However, I did respect Ballance. His betrayal
of her caused me to lose respect for him.

Another classy moment from a show I heard last year was when she
claimed that society can't allow gay people - or as she horrifically
calls them: "biological errors" - to get legally married, because "a
legal precedent would be set" and we'd then have to "allow people who
have sex with their parents to get married to one another" (?!?) That
**** is just crazy enough to be hilarious.

It's shtick. Unfortunately for her it cost her network the loss of $30
million in billing. The Gay community was extremely effective in
targeting her advertisers. When there's no legitimate argument for
something they grab at straws and suggest it'll result in people
marrying animals. The Radical Religious Right is very creative and
seem to turn their sexual fantasies into predictions of the future.

Mind you, her homophobic
comments were determined to be in violation of the human rights
provision of the Canadian Broadcasting Code of Ethics, and she lost
the majority of her stations in Canada.

The US has no such code of ethis. In fact, with our FCC we never know
what the rules are until we've broken them and have a whopping fine
staring us in the face.

The important thing to remember kids, is that Laura Schlessinger is
neither a medical doctor nor accredited in a discipline one would
traditionally look to for the generation of expertise in moral,
societal, or spiritual matters. She's just a lying hypocritical
****face with a radio show.

Listen to her show with the same rubbernecking approach you'd take at
seeing a serious traffic accident. The only difference is the accident
was an accident. Calling the show is simple masochism.

She is a Doctor of Physiology. She's not a Theologian (her book was
written by a Rabbi). Taking her advice is like hiring a Proctologist
to perform brain surgery.



Rich

Why would anyone want photograph that woman in the buff? Sex with her?
Ugh!

On 4 Jun 2004 00:32:09 GMT, (Larkin) wrote:

Why would anyone want photograph that woman in the buff? Sex with her?
Ugh!

If personality doesn't count, she was quite an attractive young woman.
The issue here is not whether or not you find her appealing, it's that
a serious betrayal of trust took place.

No matter how much she and I dislike each other I have to side with
her, in spite of her lying about the pictures being of her.

It was a cruel thing to do.

Rich

"Rich Wood" wrote in message
...
On 4 Jun 2004 00:32:09 GMT, (Larkin) wrote:

Why would anyone want photograph that woman in the buff? Sex with her?
Ugh!

If personality doesn't count, she was quite an attractive young woman.
The issue here is not whether or not you find her appealing, it's that
a serious betrayal of trust took place.

No matter how much she and I dislike each other I have to side with
her, in spite of her lying about the pictures being of her.

It was a cruel thing to do.

Rich

Nevertheless, Rich, I was always told when I was growing up (and have continued to
pass on to my kids) that you should never do anything that you might regret later in
life, or if you did, be prepared to accept the consequences of those actions. The
fact that Laura whats-er-name was put into a position of shame (at least as it
relates to her current "moral standards") is a fitting result in counterpoint to her
excessive hypocracy. "Don't do as I did, just do what I say" is exactly the reason
why so many kids end up regretting the consequences of their actions, since it's
natural for them to do precisely what they're told not to do.

There's better ways to raise kids (not that this applies here....I can't imagine any
self-respecting teen would listen to Schlessinger) but the idea that she can sit in
judgement of those who may not share her newly-acquired morality is why, in this
case, humiliation can be good.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
There must always be the appearance of lawfulness....especially when the law's being
broken.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
For direct replies, take out the contents between the hyphens. -Really!-

(The Bougieman) wrote in message news:



...
Ok. Rant time.

I was listening to the Dr. Laura Schlessinger radio talk show the
other day. Have you heard this? I freakin' love it. Gets me all riled
up. People from all over North America call in (over 60,000 callers a
day!) and ask her advice on their daily quandaries. The "Doctor" then
hauls her ass up on top of her ivory tower of moral superiority, and
proceeds to berate her devoted flock like they're 7 year old retards
with **** filled diapers.


If you dislike her so much, don't listen.

From what I've heard of her, most of her advice seems to be along the
lines of "get a spine, take responsibility for your life and do the
right thing". I that this is out of step in these politically correct
times where nothing bad that happens to you is your fault, you're a
victim and someone else should be made to pay.

So she's not a psychologist, neither are "Ann Landers" or Dear Abby
and they dish out all sorts of dubious advice too. Or is it OK for
them because they're in the paper and not on the air?

Dude, you really need to lighten up.

So she's not a psychologist, neither are "Ann Landers" or Dear Abby
and they dish out all sorts of dubious advice too. Or is it OK for
them because they're in the paper and not on the air?

No, it's OK for them because they don't brand themselves with the doctorate,
thereby claiming professional expertise that only a tiny fraction of the
audience would know was in an unrelated field.

Jerome

"Cooperstown.Net" wrote in message news:

So she's not a psychologist, neither are "Ann Landers" or Dear Abby
and they dish out all sorts of dubious advice too. Or is it OK for
them because they're in the paper and not on the air?

No, it's OK for them because they don't brand themselves with the doctorate,
thereby claiming professional expertise that only a tiny fraction of the
audience would know was in an unrelated field.


So are you equally opposed to Dr. Demento? Does he have a doctorate in Dementia?

She has the degree, she's entitled to use the title.