Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hey Folks,
Kinda down at the moment, our college radio station got busted by the FCC. Here a list of the stuff that was hauled off: NRG PLL-PRO 3 20W TRANSMITTER NRG 220 WATT RF LINEAR AMPLIFIER NRG PRO III STEREO CODER NRG PRO III STEREO LIMITER COMPRESSOR DAIWA CN-101L SWR+POWER METER COMET CFM-95SL 5/8 WAVE ANTENNA 50 FEET OF LMR 400 COAX KENWOOD R-1000 SW RECEIVER (my fathers old short-wave radio?) The really weird part is that we WERE NOT transmitting at the time of the raid. One of the agents tolds us that they traced us through a purchase order from Broadcast-Warehouse! It's true that we bought a 150w amp from broadcastwarehouse.com a few weeks ago. How did the FCC know about that? Anyways, we will rebuild the station and continue to fight the globle interests of the MEGA-MACHINE. DEATH TO THE MEGA-MACHINE! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , wrote:
Kinda down at the moment, our college radio station got busted by the FCC. Here a list of the stuff that was hauled off: NRG PLL-PRO 3 20W TRANSMITTER NRG 220 WATT RF LINEAR AMPLIFIER NRG PRO III STEREO CODER NRG PRO III STEREO LIMITER COMPRESSOR DAIWA CN-101L SWR+POWER METER COMET CFM-95SL 5/8 WAVE ANTENNA 50 FEET OF LMR 400 COAX KENWOOD R-1000 SW RECEIVER (my fathers old short-wave radio?) That stuff isn't type-accepted. You should not be using it on the air. The really weird part is that we WERE NOT transmitting at the time of the raid. One of the agents tolds us that they traced us through a purchase order from Broadcast-Warehouse! It's true that we bought a 150w amp from broadcastwarehouse.com a few weeks ago. How did the FCC know about that? The same way that if you bought an amp from HRO and didn't submit the license along with it. Anyways, we will rebuild the station and continue to fight the globle interests of the MEGA-MACHINE. DEATH TO THE MEGA-MACHINE! I'm not sure what the MEGA-MACHINE is, but if you're running non-type-accepted gear that isn't custom-made, you're going to get a citation. It's good to see that FCC at least enforcing _some_ technical standards these days, since it's been a long time since they've paid much attention. Bring back annual proof of performance measurements and hourly logs, that's what I'd suggest... --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
we will rebuild the station and continue to fight the globle interests of
the MEGA-MACHINE. DEATH TO THE MEGA-MACHINE! Brilliant, just brilliant. Advertise to the world that you intend to break the law yet again. Why don't you just call the FCC and tell them? Oh, sorry...YOU ALREADY DID! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right or wrong, the broadcast regulations *are* the official rules
These rules were thought up before PLL transmitters. Analog mini transmitters can be all over the dial. The new digital ones can lock dead on. I think the FCC should change the rules to allow higher power levels depending on the type of equipment you're using. Low power stations can provide a valuable service and should be allowed to be part of the media mix. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , fredtv wrote:
Right or wrong, the broadcast regulations *are* the official rules These rules were thought up before PLL transmitters. Analog mini transmitters can be all over the dial. The new digital ones can lock dead on. No. Crystal control is just as accurate as PLL control. And the FCC frankly doesn't care _how_ you control frequency, just as long as it stays within the specified limits. I think the FCC should change the rules to allow higher power levels depending on the type of equipment you're using. Low power stations can provide a valuable service and should be allowed to be part of the media mix. That's what the whole LPFM licensing is about, and it's what the old Class D allocation used to be about. The problem is that the bands are too crowded for many of the things to be given out. There just aren't a lot of places to shoehorn low power stations today because there are already too many stations on the bands. Now, if I ran the FCC, I'd be revoking licenses right and left for "failure to provide a public service and contribute to the public good," but I do not. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey wrote:
In article , fredtv wrote: Right or wrong, the broadcast regulations *are* the official rules These rules were thought up before PLL transmitters. Analog mini transmitters can be all over the dial. The new digital ones can lock dead on. No. Crystal control is just as accurate as PLL control. And the FCC frankly doesn't care _how_ you control frequency, just as long as it stays within the specified limits. Scott, the other item that's being missed by these people who believe that they can use non type accepted equipment is the strenuous off frequency emissions standards. I think the FCC should change the rules to allow higher power levels depending on the type of equipment you're using. Low power stations can provide a valuable service and should be allowed to be part of the media mix. That's what the whole LPFM licensing is about, and it's what the old Class D allocation used to be about. The problem is that the bands are too crowded for many of the things to be given out. There just aren't a lot of places to shoehorn low power stations today because there are already too many stations on the bands. Now, if I ran the FCC, I'd be revoking licenses right and left for "failure to provide a public service and contribute to the public good," but I do not. --scott Charlie -- To respond by Email remove never- from address |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:01:23 +0000, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Now, if I ran the FCC, I'd be revoking licenses right and left for "failure to provide a public service and contribute to the public good," but I do not. --scott I wish you were running the FCC, stations these days simply don't do any public service. Running recorded Public service programs at 4 am on a Sunday morning won't cut it in my book. -- Korbin Dallas The name was changed to protect the guilty. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Korbin Dallas wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:01:23 +0000, Scott Dorsey wrote: Now, if I ran the FCC, I'd be revoking licenses right and left for "failure to provide a public service and contribute to the public good," but I do not. I wish you were running the FCC, stations these days simply don't do any public service. Running recorded Public service programs at 4 am on a Sunday morning won't cut it in my book. I agree, but the chances of my ever running the FCC are about as good as Clear Channel putting a classical station on the air. Oh yes, and annual proof of performance measurements. I'd bring them back. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
F/S Texas Star Sweet 16 W/ Mod V Plus driver and fan kit....ALL NEW $675.00 | CB | |||
Peaked and Tuned | CB | |||
? on a texas ranger tr696f ssb base | CB | |||
"Export" radio loophole closed - BUST MADE | CB |