| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 4 May 2007 16:17:09 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote: +++On May 4, 5:44 pm, Frank Gilliland wrote: +++ Not really. Insertion loss of a [ferrite] balun could negate any gain +++ you may get by impedance matching. It is also fixed, while a coax stub +++ can be easily 'retuned' by simply pinning the coax. Not only that, +++ since the antenna is (hopefully) way up in the air, the coax used for +++ matching is either incorporated in the line or hung from the side, +++ making any worries about extra coax "kicking around" a non-issue. You +++ should be more worried about where you're going to put that nine +++ square feet of ground plane. +++ +++Pure rubbish... a balun would have perhaps 0.1dB insertion loss. The +++antenna gain is perhaps twenty times that! +++www.telstar-electronics.com +++ ************* Baluns and RF transformers can be loss. Many factors come into effect. These include wire guage, operating frequency, power levels, load and source vriations and core material. Also not to forget connetor losses. A well designed Balun or RF transformer will comparable low loss performance of a coaxial matching section. There are some benefits for RF transformers and baluns in that they are considerably more broadbanded. Over narrow bandwidths the coaxial matching section can be more tolerable to impedance variation from both the load and the source. james |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Question about 20-meter monoband vertical (kinda long - antenna gurus welcome) | Antenna | |||
| Question for You Grounding Gurus | Antenna | |||
| Newbie needing Gurus Software 4 Pro-97(20-527) | Scanner | |||
| Any DX160 gurus here? | Shortwave | |||
| Question for Radio Wave Gurus/Experts | Equipment | |||