Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Richard Cranium wrote:
JJ wrote in message ... Alun Palmer wrote: Not quite. The rule is the same, but the 'international requirements' it refers to have changed. How you interpret that is another thing, but the FCC chose to write a rule that incorporates by reference the rules that were changed in the WRC. Here's an idea for an analogy. Anyone here ever write any code of the computer kind? Say you write something that makes a call to another object/subroutine, etc. The ITU have re-written the subroutine, and the FCC code includes a GOSUB that calls it (revealing my BASIC roots here). You obviously don't understand the FCC rules any better than Keith. Until the FCC eliminates the code test requirement, everything remains the same for U.S. hams. What are you babbling about, JJ? He made it quite clear (except for morons): 1. The FCC Rules & Regs make reference to the code requirement as spelled out by the WRC. 2. The WRC no longer requires any code. 3. Ergo, the FCC Rules & Regs no longer require code. What's so difficult to understand? (Other than English, that is.) There's a fourth step he 4. Since there is no international requirement any more, no one can meet that [now nonexistent] requirement. Therefore, under this logical application of the regulation and the events effective July 5, 2003, there is no operating authority for any Novice or Technician (Plus or with an element 1 CSCE) for any frequency below 30MHz, since said authority contains a requirement that cannot be met (because there is no such requirement anymore, having been repealed). |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|