Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2   Report Post  
Old September 23rd 03, 03:35 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Curious Dan" wrote:
I only have because of your false
accusations.

You keep ****ing with us CB'er's. You are gonna learn the hard way.

My 30L-1 is going 6 meters.

--
http://NewsReader.Com/
50 GB/Month
  #6   Report Post  
Old September 28th 03, 11:20 PM
Brainbuster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Keyclownz R Dopers wrote in message
.. .

Those trying to claim to be "pro-legal" consist of an Amateur band
abuser, a pyromaniac with a big stick by his door, and a school dropout
who would fit in swilling out at a farm.


where is your proof, dipstick. name the names or shutTFU



Such anger... you really should take something for that pain.
Maybe you recognise yourself as being one of those people I mention... which
one describes you?
Here's a reminder of your policy on truth and proof...

Citizens For A Keyclown Free Environment wrote in message
. ..

1. We don't care if you call us liars about the twithed situation. You
care about that, not us. We don't have to be honest with you.



So, take your own advice, hypocrite.
Until then, take a look back through the posts on this newsgroup... and
figure it out.


I feel sorry for anyone who has to live in birmingham



Nobody **has** to live in Birmingham. Although nobody choses to be born
there, they must choose to stay.
I feel sorry for anyone living in a city.

From where I am, I have a great view overlooking fields and several
counties.
With a CB, I can talk for miles with just the legal 4 Watts FM we are
allowed. Never mind the 3 or 4 miles you city folk seem to get... I get
mobiles 15 to 20 miles away in the green, near the end of the scale.
Some CBers on the East coast have QSL cards from people in this area...
sweet.



  #7   Report Post  
Old September 25th 03, 06:53 AM
Brainbuster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Curious Dan wrote in message ...

You sure as **** said it was me "Who needs to suggest that Mr "Dopers" is
really the "curious" one from PA,
when he admits it himself..."



I only pointed out what was said on this group. If the truth hurts so much,
go run to your mummy.


oh btw , don't think I will continue to respond to you.



Oh yes, that famous "killfile". Very effective, huh?
LMAO.


I only have because of your false accusations.




I provided proof and showed the posts. Even Sparkles is now suggesting
that you are the same person with his responses. Don't blame me for the
crap that you and your buddies bury yourselves in.

You, your sockos, and your buddies cannot show any proof of your claims...
just
school playground type games and diversions from what they claimed. When
all else fails, just act like you have forgotten what you said. If that
doesn't work, go back to the killfile that never worked in the first place.

Why don't you just killfile all those you disagree with?



  #8   Report Post  
Old September 26th 03, 07:27 AM
Brainbuster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Brainbuster wrote in message ...


Sorry for the multiple posts, my ISP server is acting up.
My software kept reporting a lack of response, and retrying. It would seem
that the server was accepting one post, then locking up before letting my
software know it was accepted.

Eventually, I disconnected and reconnected before retrying, and their naff
system actually started working. Not the first time their system has done
this, as you will see from the previous multiple post a few days back.



  #9   Report Post  
Old September 26th 03, 06:42 PM
AKC 4 LIFE
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Brainbuster" wrote in message ...
Brainbuster wrote in message ...


Sorry for the multiple posts, my ISP server is acting up.
My software kept reporting a lack of response, and retrying. It would seem
that the server was accepting one post, then locking up before letting my
software know it was accepted.

Eventually, I disconnected and reconnected before retrying, and their naff
system actually started working. Not the first time their system has done
this, as you will see from the previous multiple post a few days back.



ohhhhhhhh but not too long ago brainbluster denied he multiple posted.
now he is blaming it on software failure. oh i see. that is almost as
funny as landfags excuse that someone else was using his email at the
time of the transexual posts LOL



"Brainbuster" wrote
You awlways reply 5 to my 1


I counted at least 10 of your replies so far


Not to ONE of your posts. Every time you are caught in your lies,

you try
changing the claim.
Stop avoiding it... show proof, or just accept that your lies are

useless.



--
--
H is for the hairless balls that Landfag enjoys
Y is for yellow lies that Moped employs
P is for these pussys they are so queer
O is for opinions they hate to hear
C is for CB they never discuss
R is for RichCranus, oh what a wuss
I is for ignorance, they have it in spades
T is for Twithed and his loony tirades
E is the emails they lied about from george
S is the rest of the crap that they forge

......put it all together and it spells HYPOCRITES, HYPOCRITES,
HYPOCRITES!
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 29th 03, 07:16 AM
Brainbuster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

AKC 4 LIFE wrote in message ...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message

...
Brainbuster wrote in message ...

Eventually, I disconnected and reconnected before retrying, and their
naff system actually started working. Not the first time their system
has done
this, as you will see from the previous multiple post a few days back.


ohhhhhhhh but not too long ago brainbluster denied he multiple posted.



Please show proof... where is the post?
Oh yes, proving your accusations is not your strong point.


now he is blaming it on software failure.



No, try looking again... I said that it was the ISP SERVER.
That may not suit you, but it is a fact.

I made ONE copy of a message but, because my ISP's news server was acting
up, the server refused to acknowledge that it had received and posted a
message... so my systen (quite correctly) kept trying to send it.
That is NOT a problem with my system or software, it is doing what it
should... trying to send a message.
For software to assume that a message was received, without confirmation,
would risk loss of messages.

Look at the times and IP numbers
You will see that they are all copies of the same message... the creation
time is the same, to the second.
Also, you will see that, apart from the last copy, the message that got
repeated was sent on a different IP number than the rest. All the other
posts that day which (as you will see by their creation times) should have
been sent with the first copy of the repeated post, were also delayed until
the IP number changed.

That is because the problem with the ISP was cured by disconnecting,
reconnecting, and getting in through another part of their system. When
this was done, the ISP server acknowledged the post and my system was then
able to remove it from the "Outbox" and send the rest of the messages.

Is this all too much for a Google troll to understand?





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New ARRL Proposal N2EY Policy 331 March 4th 04 12:02 AM
VE's may lose 220-222MHz KØHB Policy 0 January 12th 04 09:39 PM
hey brainbuster jim CB 1 September 18th 03 06:51 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017